This assignment will provide a practical introduction to the CORE ELMS system.
Instructions
Complete the following:
Review the information related to the capstone in the Unit 10 introduction and studies.
Review the SoNHS User Guide – CORE ELMS (linked in the Resources).
Go to the SoNHS Practicum page on Campus (linked in the Resources) and find your program:
Review the expectations and requirements to acquire a practicum site for your program, including the application process and the required paperwork, so you will be well prepared.
Click the CORE ELMS link under Course Tools in the course room’s left-navigation menu to access the CORE ELMS website.
Take a screenshot of your successful login.
NHS 8002 Unit 10 Assignment CORE ELMS Login
For instructions on how to take a screenshot using a Mac, refer to the “How to Take a Screenshot on Your Mac” instructions linked in the Resources.
For instructions on how to take a screenshot in Windows, refer to the “7 Ways to Take Screenshots in Windows 10” instructions linked in the Resources.
Takes some time to explore the CORE ELMS site and documents.
Upload the screenshot of your successful login to complete the assignment.
Your paper should meet the following requirements:
Written communication: Write coherently to support central ideas, in appropriate format, and with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics.
Length of paper: 6–8 typed, double-spaced pages, excluding the title page, abstract, and reference page.
References: At least five different resources (peer-reviewed journals or sources, assigned unit readings, et cetera) to support your statements.
APA formatting: Follow current APA guidelines for style and formatting, as well as for citing your resources in the body of your paper and on the Reference page.
Included a properly formatted title page, abstract, and reference page.
The APA Style Paper Tutorial and the associated APA Style Paper Template are linked in Resources to help you in writing and formatting your paper. Format your work per these documents.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Submit the assignment to your instructor as an attachment in the assignment area no later than 11:59 p.m. central time on Sunday.
When you submit your assignment for grading, it will automatically be submitted to SafeAssign for a final report. Your instructor will provide feedback on a minimum of one originality report for an assignment each term. Some faculty may provide feedback on all originality reports for the assignments. It may be helpful to review your instructor’s policy for the course.
Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information.
NHS 8002 Unit 10 Assignment CORE ELMS Login Reference
National Center for Healthcare Leadership.(2016). NCHL orga
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.
Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category
10
9
8
4
0
Application of Course Knowledge –
Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations
Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category
5
4
3
2
0
Interactive Dialogue
Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.
(5 points possible per graded thread)
Exceeds minimum post requirements
Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
Replies to a question posed by a peer
Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
Has only one post for the week
Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
Does not post to the thread
No connections are made to the topic
Minus 1 Point
Minus 2 Point
Minus 3 Point
Minus 4 Point
Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA
Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.
The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition
2-3 errors in APA format.
Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
4-5 errors in APA format.
Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
Writing style is somewhat focused.
6-7 errors in APA format.
Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
8-10 errors in APA format.
Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
Writing style does not facilitate communication.
The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost
-5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements
per discussion thread
The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.
The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement
per discussion thread
The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.
The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.
