MSN 6218 Assignment: Advocating for Lasting Change

MSN 6218 Assignment: Advocating for Lasting Change

Sample Answer for MSN 6218 Assignment: Advocating for Lasting Change Included

MSN 6218 Assignment  Advocating for Lasting Change

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: MSN 6218 Assignment: Advocating for Lasting Change

Title: MSN 6218 Assignment: Advocating for Lasting Change

Policy and Financial Support

Jordan is a small town in Minnesota whose community faces numerous problems in getting medical care that affects their mental health and causes several chronic conditions (Capella University, 2023). The proposed change for the Jordan community is implementing telehealth technology within the community center, which needs policy changes and financial support from government and private organizations for a successful implementation.

Telehealth technology provides cost-effective remote access to medical care for all community members in Jordan, but it needs support and funds for successful implementation (Ganesh et al., 2020). The policies that apply to the proposed change are governmental organizations, such as the Affordable Care Act (ACA), Medicare, and Medicaid policies (Carey et al., 2020). These policies will help provide affordable expansion and insurance programs for the low-socioeconomic group who cannot afford medical care.

Policy Change and Fundings Needed 

Jordan’s community center and healthcare services also need more medical care access resources (Capella University, 2023). As a result, they cannot afford the change proposal and require funding from external government and private sources to manage telehealth technology and healthcare staff for remote care access. The survey results also indicated that the people in the Jordan community belong to a low-socioeconomic group and cannot afford medical care (City of Jordan, 2021). Appropriate funding will assist in implementing telehealth technology that impacts positive results in providing healthcare and overcomes challenges faced by low-income people.

Challenges or Concerns

Several challenges and barriers to the change proposal include resistance to technology acceptance by the community members due to a lack of knowledge and awareness. The chances of data breaches and security or privacy concerns are also barriers to the change process. Other barriers are the need for more technical assistance in using modern telehealth technology by community members and healthcare staff (Mahoney, 2020). If the problems are not addressed, they will result in challenging situations in managing patients’ health conditions. In addition, hospital readmission rates will increase, resulting in burnout and disturbance in work balance. So, the proposed change must be implemented in the community center of Jordan to overcome the problems.

Assumptions

The Windshield survey result evaluated the need to improve healthcare services for the low-economic groups in the Jordan community (Capella University, 2023). The assumptions supporting the rationale for the current policy change by policymakers, members of the community, or health care providers are the need for medical care access to all community members without any social, racial, or economic differences or biases.

Social Determinants of Health 

Social determinants of health are the factors that affect the health and well-being of people (Palmer et al., 2019). These health determinants include living conditions and resources for education and medical care. These factors also include social and physical aspects that affect the health of individuals. The survey results showed that the SDOH for the Jordan community is socioeconomic status, racism, education, and access to medical care services (Capella University, 2023). The differences result in health disparities in getting medical care. These determinants need improvement through telehealth technology to provide equal access to medical care without socio-economic or racial differences.

Windshield Survey and Environmental Analysis Findings

The Windshield survey and environmental analysis help identify the health needs and environmental conditions of the Jordan community that need improvement. The Windshield survey evaluated that the Jordan community has schools, parks, a city council, healthcare services, restaurants, and recreation centers. These are the positive aspects of the Jordan community. However, there are some negative aspects; thus, opportunities exist for improvement. The negative aspects are water quality, air quality, and socioeconomic differences (due to the low income of individuals) (Capella University, 2023). The environmental analysis indicated that water quality is not good and contains contaminants that cause several diseases like cholera, hepatitis, and others (City of Jordan, 2021). These factors affect the health condition and cause health disparities in getting equal medical care access. The change proposal of telehealth technology will help overcome such disparities and cost-effectively provide equal medical care access. Telehealth technology will also help raise awareness among community members about the water quality, air quality, and diseases caused due to contaminations. In addition, there are opportunities for improvement in the available vacant or empty spaces in the community. These spaces can be used for effective business plans that benefit the community.

Change Proposal 

The health disparities in getting medical care need to be addressed. The existing policies in the Jordan community need to address the problems of remote-care access for low-income individuals. The proposed telehealth technology will help to overcome the problem of remote-care access. The proposed change will also provide cost-effective treatment and reduce the financial burden as it lessens travel costs and expensive insurance plans. This will help low-socioeconomic groups quickly get medical care without social, cultural, or racial differences. The desired outcomes of increased healthcare access, reduced financial burden, and provision of cost-effective care can be achieved through the change process of telehealth technology.

Various studies from the literature support the effectiveness of telehealth technology in providing medical care access to individuals. A study states that telehealth is a cost-effective approach that reduces travel hurdles and expenditures in accessing medical care (Ben-Assuli, 2022). Another study found that during COVID-19, telehealth provided excellent support in orthopedic surgeries (Sprowls et al., 2020). Video conferencing also can help surgeons treat patients effectively by getting expert opinions from other professionals in the field. A study demonstrated the critical role of telehealth in reducing health disparities by providing equal medical care accessible to all people (Hirko et al., 2020). Telehealth technology is a game changer for virtual medical care by experts in the field.

Benefits of the Change for Community and Stakeholders

The proposed change will provide benefits to the community members and stakeholders. The Jordan community will benefit from Telehealth by providing individuals with equal medical care opportunities. It will help the low-socioeconomic group of people get medical care that was previously not affordable. The travel cost will be reduced and help the patients and healthcare organization manage the work balance (Hirko et al., 2020). Burnout among healthcare providers and nurses due to work pressure will be reduced. Moreover, the operating costs of the emergency department will be reduced due to fewer readmissions to the hospital.

 

Professional Context

Nurse leaders must be able to make effective financial and policy decisions. Equally important is the ability to communicate their vision for change to policymakers and provide objective, evidence-based support for their position with respect to the regulatory, political, social, ethical, legal, and financial aspects of systemic change.

This assignment provides an opportunity for you to develop a presentation aimed at soliciting resource and policy support for the community health care change you proposed in the previous assignment. By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course
competencies and assignment criteria:

Competency

1: Identify the challenges and opportunities facing health care.

Explain why proposed changes to a health care system require policy and financial support
to ensure positive, systemic change and to overcome present challenges.

Competency

2: Compare the effects of different health care finance models and policy frameworks on resources and patient outcomes.

Provide broad budget estimates to fund specific capital or human resource outlays that
are important to the success of a proposed change.

Competency

3: Evaluate the positive and negative influences of leaders on health care
processes and outcomes.

Assess the potential future for wellness, health, and improved overall care and the role
of visionary leaders in achieving the desired goals.

Cultivate stakeholder interest in and support for the proposed changes to a community
health care system.

Competency

4: Develop proactive strategies to change the culture of the organization by incorporating evidence-based practices.

Provide compelling evidence that proposed changes to a health care system will produce
the intended outcomes.

Outline a plan for leading transformational, evidence-based change in an organization.

Competency

5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and style consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly standards.

Develop slides that augment a multimedia presentation.

Argue persuasively to obtain policy and financial support from policymakers for a proposed
community health care change.

Support assertions, arguments, propositions, and conclusions with relevant and credible
evidence.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: MSN 6218 Assignment: Advocating for Lasting Change

Scenario

The executive leaders at Vila Health accepted your change proposal and would like to move it forward. However, lasting change in a volatile regulatory and policy environment will require adequate funding and support from the applicable governing body or regulatory agency. Consequently, you have been asked to present the proposed change to policymakers to seek their support and funding for the change as an established policy for the organization and community.

Instructions

Develop and record a video presentation for policymakers from the appropriate governing body or regulatory agency requesting policy and financial support for your proposed change. Draw on your work in the previous assessments and consolidate lessons learned.

The presentation requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. The Guiding Questions: Advocating for Lasting Change document provides additional considerations that may be helpful in completing your assignment. In addition,
be sure to note the requirements below for the presentation format, length, and for citing supporting evidence.

Explain why proposed changes to a health care system require policy support to ensure positive, systemic change and to overcome present challenges.

Provide compelling evidence that proposed changes to a health care system will produce the intended outcomes.

Provide broad budget estimates to fund specific capital or human resource outlays that are important to the success of a proposed change.

Outline a plan for leading transformational, evidence-based change in an organization.

Assess the potential future for wellness, health, and improved overall care and the role of visionary leaders in achieving the desired goals.

As a guide, explore the website of HealthyPeople.gov, linked in the Resources.

Cultivate stakeholder interest in and support for the proposed changes to a community
health care system.

Develop slides that augment a multimedia presentation.

Argue persuasively to obtain policy and financial support from policymakers for a proposed community health care change.

Support assertions, arguments, propositions, and conclusions with relevant and credible evidence.

Presentation Format and Length

Remember, you may use Microsoft PowerPoint or other suitable presentation software to create your slides. If you elect to use an application other than PowerPoint, check with your faculty to avoid potential file compatibility issues.

Your slide deck should consist of 10–15 slides, not including the title, questions, and references slides. Use the speaker’s notes section of each slide to develop your talking points and cite your sources, as appropriate.

Be sure that your slide deck includes the following slides:

Note: Your slide titles will depend on your choice of community and the specific content of your change proposal.

Title
slide.

Title or
name of your project (focus of your change proposal).

Subtitle
(optional), which could include Jordan or Armitage, if not part of the title.

Your name.

Date.

Course
number and title.

Introduction.

Identify
the stakeholders to whom you are presenting.

Social
determinants affecting health in the community (may need more than one slide).

Synopsis of
the windshield survey and environmental analysis findings.

Identify
the positive aspects of the community.

Identify
opportunities for improvement. Although your change proposal addresses these
opportunities, avoid phrasing them as negatives.

Your change
proposal—briefly outlined (may need more than one slide).

Benefits of the change to the community and stakeholders.

Challenges or concerns.

Address the implications for the community and organizational stakeholders, if these
opportunities are not addressed.

Funding
(may need more than one slide).

Include the financial implications for the community and organizational stakeholders.

Specify your funding needs (how much and for what)?

Community health implications (may need more than one slide).

Explain how the proposed change will improve the health of the community.

Address both direct or indirect benefits, as applicable.

Conclusion.

Summarize key points.

Be sure to thank your audience for their time and consideration of your proposal.

Questions.

Add a slide to prompt questions from the audience.

References
(at the end of your presentation).

Supporting
Evidence

Cite 3–5 credible sources from peer-reviewed journals or professional industry
publications to support your presentation.

Submission
Requirements

Upload your video presentation and attach the presentation slides, with speaker notes. You may use Kaltura Media, Adobe Connect, or other technology of your choice for your video recording. See the Using Kaltura [PDF] for more information about uploading media. You may submit the assessment only once, so be sure that the assessment deliverables are included before submitting your assessment.

MSN 6218 Assignment  Advocating for Lasting Change Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable	No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions. Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Application of Course Knowledge – Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources; Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources. Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content	Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson. Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson	Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post. Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life	Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category	5	4	3	2	0
Interactive Dialogue Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days. (5 points possible per graded thread)	Exceeds minimum post requirements Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days. Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days Replies to a question posed by a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days. The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty	Has only one post for the week Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments	Does not post to the thread No connections are made to the topic
	Minus 1 Point	Minus 2 Point	Minus 3 Point	Minus 4 Point	Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted. Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition	2-3 errors in APA format. Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors. Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.	4-5 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is somewhat focused.	6-7 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.	8-10 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.	Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format. Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style does not facilitate communication. The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
	0 points lost				-5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements per discussion thread	The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.				The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement per discussion thread	The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.				The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.