Boost your Grades with us today!
MSN 6011 Unit 10 Discussion 2: Course Reflection
MSN 6011 Unit 10 Discussion 2 Course Reflection
For this discussion, please reflect on your experiences and
learning throughout this course. In your response, consider the following:
What have been the most useful and interesting skills you
have obtained or content you have learned about?
How do you envision, or how have you already been, applying
aspects of your course work in your practice?
Finally, comment on one area of the course for which you
wish there had been more content or instruction. How do you think this would
have contributed to your learning and experience in this course?
Response Guidelines
Review the responses of your peers and respond to at least
two of them. In your response, consider addressing one or more of the
following:
How your course experiences were similar or different.
How your plans to apply your learning in this course.
Which of the competencies presented in the article that are
not already part of your practice do you believe have the most potential to
improve your practice?
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: MSN 6011 Unit 10 Discussion 2: Course Reflection
Why do you think these competencies have the most potential
to improve your practice?
How do you plan to work on incorporating these competencies
into your practice?
What resources, training, or mentoring might help you to do
this?
Response Guidelines
Review the responses of your peers and respond to at least
two of them. In your response, consider addressing one or more of the
following:
A comparison of the competencies that are most relevant to
the practices of both you and your peer.
A suggestion about other strategies or resources that could
help your peer integrate competencies into their practice.
Resources
Discussion Participation Scoring Guide.
The Establishment of Evidence-Based Practice Competencies
for Practicing Registered Nurses and Advanced Practice Nurses in Real-World
Clinical Settings: Proficiencies to Improve Healthcare Quality, Reliability,
Patient Outcomes, and Costs.
MSN 6011 Unit 10 Discussion 2 Course Reflection Grading Rubric
Performance Category | 100% or highest level of performance
100% 16 points |
Very good or high level of performance
88% 14 points |
Acceptable level of performance
81% 13 points |
Inadequate demonstration of expectations
68% 11 points |
Deficient level of performance
56% 9 points
|
Failing level
of performance 55% or less 0 points |
Total Points Possible= 50 | 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points |
Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics. |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements
|
16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points | |
Application of Course Knowledge
Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements
|
10 Points | 9 Points | 6 Points | 0 Points | |||
Interactive Dialogue
Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic. |
Demonstrated all of the following:
|
Demonstrated 3 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 2 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:
|
||
8 Points | 7 Points | 6 Points | 5 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
Grammar, Syntax, APA
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error. |
The following was present:
AND
AND
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
0 Points Deducted | 5 Points Lost | |||||
Participation
Requirements |
Demonstrated the following:
|
Failed to demonstrate the following:
|
||||
0 Points Lost | 5 Points Lost | |||||
Due Date Requirements | Demonstrated all of the following:
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Demonstrates one or less of the following.
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |