MSN 6011 Assignment: Patient-Centered Care Report -

MSN 6011 Assignment: Patient-Centered Care Report

MSN 6011 Assignment Patient-Centered Care Report

Professional Context

Master’s-level nurses need to be able to think critically
about the evidence, outcomes data, and other relevant information they
encounter throughout their daily practice. Often the evidence or information
that a nurse encounters, researches, or studies is not presented in the exact
context of that nurse’s practice. A key skill of the master’s-level nurse is to
be able to transfer evidence from the context it was presented in and apply to
a different context in order to maximize the benefit to patients in that new
context.

Scenario

For this assignment you will be basing your report on the
scenario presented in the Evidence-Based Health Evaluation and Application
media piece. Some of the writing you completed and exported from the media
piece can constitute your pre-writing and inform the development of your final
submission. Further, even though the media piece was framed within one type of
care setting, you can extrapolate the situation into another care setting that
is more relevant to you. You will still be able to apply community outcomes
data to an individual patient or case.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: MSN 6011 Assignment: Patient-Centered Care Report

Instructions

For this assignment, you will apply the outcomes of the
Population Health Improvement Initiative (PHII) to a patient-centered care
report. The bullet points below correspond to grading criteria in the scoring
guide. Be sure that your report addresses all of the bullets below, at minimum.
You may also want to read the Patient-Centered Care Report Scoring Guide and
Guiding Questions: Patient-Centered Care Report (both linked in the Resources)
to better understand how each criterion will be assessed:

Evaluate the outcomes of a population health improvement
initiative.

Propose strategies for improving the outcomes of the
population health improvement plan, or ensuring that all outcomes are being
addressed, based on the best available evidence.

Develop an individualized personal care approach that
incorporates lessons learned from a population health improvement initiative.

Justify the value and relevance of evidence used as the
basis for your personal care approach to your patient.

Propose a framework that could be used to evaluate desired
outcomes of your approach to personalizing care for your patients and areas
that could be applied to similar situations and patients in the future.

Write content clearly and logically, with correct use of
grammar, punctuation, and spelling.

Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly
formatting citations and references using APA style.

Example assignment: You may use the Patient-Centered Care
Report Example, linked in the Resources, to give you an idea of what a
Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.

Submission Requirements

Length of submission: 4-6 double-spaced, typed pages. Your
report should be succinct yet substantive.

Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3-5 sources of
scholarly or professional evidence that support your evaluation,
recommendations, and plans.

APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted
according to current APA style.

Resources

Patient-Centered Care Report Scoring Guide.

Evidence-Based Health Evaluation and Application |
Transcript.

Guiding Questions: Patient-Centered Care Report [DOC].

APA Paper Template.

APA Paper Tutorial.

Patient-Centered Care Report Example.

Patient-Centered Care

Person-centered care means treating a patient as a person and an equal partner in their healing journey and focusing care on their health needs. I believe person-centered care strategies should be individualized, harmonized, and enable patients to reach their full potential. Therefore, the nurse or healthcare professional providing person-centered care should consider the patient’s needs, values, and preferences when making clinical decisions, which fosters respectful care. Kwame & Petrucka (2021) assert that the healthcare provider must consider a patient’s previous healthcare experiences and knowledge and, thus, provide care that focuses on and respects their values, preferences, and needs by increasingly involving the patient in the care process.

A nurse practitioner should first evaluate the patient’s abilities to manage and improve their health and collaboratively identify strategies that will help the patient in these abilities (Kwame & Petrucka, 2021). I believe that a fundamental aspect of patient-centered care is delivering services that respect and meet patients’ needs. This fosters positive healthcare outcomes, improves patients’ perceptions of quality of care, and improves patient satisfaction with care.

Holistic nursing means a comprehensive approach to patient care. It entails treating the whole person by also considering their mental and social factors instead of just focusing on managing the symptoms of their diagnosis. I perceive holistic care as a nursing approach that addresses a patient’s physical, psychological, social, and spiritual needs. Thus, this type of care is comprehensive. Instead of treating the diagnosis, holistic nursing seeks to improve the individual patient’s overall well-being and quality of life (Papathanasiou et al., 2013). Furthermore, I believe holistic nursing is relationship-centered care that should be individualized, with the primary goal being optimal health. Therefore, the NP practicing holistic nursing should acknowledge the patient’s body, mind, and spirit by treating the entire individual instead of one symptom (Papathanasiou et al., 2013). Besides, the NP should acknowledge that various factors affect a person’s health, including dietary habits and environmental influences. Consequently, they should ask patients questions about their general lifestyle.

Cultural humility refers to being respectful and empathetic and applying critical self-reflection at intrapersonal and interpersonal levels. Hughes et al. (2020) explain that the intrapersonal element of cultural humility entails being aware of one’s limited ability to appreciate the patient’s worldview and culture. On the other hand, the interpersonal component integrates an opinion toward a patient characterized by respect and openness to the patient’s point of view. It also focuses on learning from the patient by listening and building partnerships (Hughes et al., 2020). I believe that a nurse with cultural humility should have a mindset that enables them to be open to patients’ preferences by demonstrating respect and empathy. Furthermore, if nurses combine cultural humility with critical conversation skills, they can get an opportunity to discuss cultural misunderstandings, intercultural pain, and how to develop a cultural understanding.

MSN 6011 Assignment: Patient-Centered Care Report References

Hughes, V., Delva, S., Nkimbeng, M., Spaulding, E., Turkson-Ocran, R. A., Cudjoe, J., … & Han, H. R. (2020). Not missing the opportunity: Strategies to promote cultural humility among future nursing faculty. Journal of Professional Nursing, 36(1), 28-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2019.06.005

Kwame, A., & Petrucka, P. M. (2021). A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient interactions: barriers, facilitators, and the way forward. BMC Nursing, 20(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00684-2

Papathanasiou, I., Sklavou, M., &Kourkouta, L. (2013). Holistic nursing care: Theories and perspectives. American Journal of Nursing Science, 2(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20130201.11

MSN 6011 Assignment: Patient-Centered Care Report Grading Rubric

Performance Category	100% or highest level of performance 100% 16 points	Very good or high level of performance 88% 14 points	Acceptable level of performance 81% 13 points	Inadequate demonstration of expectations 68% 11 points	Deficient level of performance 56% 9 points	Failing level of performance 55% or less 0 points
Total Points Possible= 50	16 Points	14 Points	13 Points	11 Points	9 Points	0 Points
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
	16 Points	14 Points	13 Points	11 Points	9 Points	0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
	10 Points	9 Points			6 Points	0 Points
Interactive Dialogue Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.	Demonstrated all of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.	Demonstrated 3 of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.			Demonstrated 2 of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.	Demonstrated 1 or less of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
	8 Points	7 Points	6 Points	5 Points	4 Points	0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.	The following was present: 0-3 errors in APA format AND Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.	The following was present: 4-6 errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.	The following was present: 7-9 errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.	The following was present: 10- 12 errors in APA format AND/OR Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.	The following was present: 13 – 15 errors in APA format AND/OR Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand. AND/OR The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.	The following was present: 16 to greater errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. AND/OR Writing style does not facilitate communication
	0 Points Deducted					5 Points Lost
Participation Requirements	Demonstrated the following: Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days					Failed to demonstrate the following: Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
	0 Points Lost					5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements	Demonstrated all of the following: The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.					Demonstrates one or less of the following. The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.