MBA 6024 Unit 3 Discussion Question Two Identifying strategic issues that affect the sustainability of a firm’s competitive advantage

MBA 6024 Unit 3 Discussion Question Two Identifying strategic issues that affect the sustainability of a firm’s competitive advantage

MBA 6024 Unit 3 Discussion Question Two Identifying strategic issues that affect the sustainability of a firm’s competitive advantage

 

Activity Context

This week’s discussions help you to develop the skills to master
the following course competencies:

  • Critically
    evaluate information from core business functions and the value chain to
    enhance organizational knowledge of strategic position and direction.

Activity Instructions

In this discussion, you will further your knowledge of strategic
development by:

  • Identifying
    strategic issues that affect the sustainability of a firm’s competitive
    advantage.
  • Conducting a
    competitive analysis of the firm, using resource-based theory or value
    chain model.

In Foundations of Strategy, review Case Insight 4.5:
Singapore Airlines: Reconciling Differentiation With Low Costs, on page 141.
Porter argues that a competitive advantage strategy of both cost leadership
and differentiation is impossible to sustain.

Describe your project firm’s competitive strategy and mount an
argument in favor of or against Porter’s assertion as it relates to your
project firm. Does your critical thinking about the firm’s competitive
advantage bring to mind concerns, or opportunities for how the firm could

MBA 6024 Unit 3 Discussion Question Two Identifying strategic issues that affect the sustainability of a firm’s competitive advantage
MBA 6024 Unit 3 Discussion Question Two Identifying strategic issues that affect the sustainability of a firm’s competitive advantage

exploit its competitive advantage? Do you have actionable insights about
exploiting strengths of the firm or insights about how the firm should defend
against its weaknesses?

Response Guidelines

Critically read the posts of your peers and respond to the posts
of at least two other learners. When responding, seek clarification, share
your personal experiences that relate to their experiences, and provide
feedback.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: MBA 6024 Unit 3 Discussion Question Two Identifying strategic issues that affect the sustainability of a firm’s competitive advantage

Activity Instructions

In this discussion, you will further your knowledge of strategic
development by:

  • Analyzing the
    effectiveness of the core or mainline operations of the firm to create
    and deliver products and services.
  • Identifying
    inconsistencies between the organizational design of the firm and its
    business strategy.

Analyze the firm key resources and core capabilities of the firm
you selected for your project. Identify the functional areas of the firm’s
organization or the activities in the value chain where the key resources and
core capabilities reside (see Classifying Capabilities in Chapter 3). Are
core or distinctive resources and capabilities structured and supported in a
manner that aligns with the competitive advantage? What opportunities do you
see to exploit the key capabilities of your project firm? Are there internal
weakness that should concern the firm?

Read the posts of your peers and respond to the posts of at
least two other learners. When responding, seek clarification, share your
personal experiences that relate to their experiences, and provide feedback.

MBA 6024 Unit 3 Discussion Question Two Identifying strategic issues that affect the sustainability of a firm’s competitive advantage Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)
  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition
  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

 The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

 The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.