Boost your Grades with us today!
Legislation Comparison Grid and Testimony/Advocacy Statement
Sample Answer for Legislation Comparison Grid and Testimony/Advocacy Statement Included After Question
Health-related Bill Name Medicare for All Act of 2019
Bill Number H.R. 1384
Description The Medicare for All Act of 2019 is sponsored by Pramila Jayapal a representative for Washington’s 7th congressional district. It is a national health insurance program aiming at providing comprehensive protection of all Americans against the cost of healthcare and associated services. All residents of America are eligible for the benefits (Congress. Gove, 2020). The secretary is charged with the responsibility to design a rule that provides criteria for determining residency under this Act. Additionally, people who are allowed to benefit under this policy can access healthcare services from any agency, institution, or individuals qualified to operate under this Act. Benefits for eligible individuals include hospital services such as inpatient and outpatient care, ambulatory patient care services, primary and preventive services, prescription drugs and medical devices, mental health and substance abuse, and others as provided under the Act (Congress. Gove, 2020).
Federal or State? Federal, because the bill affects all Americans countrywide.
Legislative Intent The rising cost of healthcare services in America prevents many citizens from accessing medical services (Johnson, Kishore, & Berwick, 2020). A way of providing access to healthcare services for all Americans is needed. The Medicare for All Act of 2019 has been proposed to comprehensively protect all American residents against the cost of healthcare and related services (Congress. Gove, 2020). Furthermore, the bill aims at bringing equity in the healthcare system by removing financial disparities and other forms of discrimination.
Proponents/ Opponents Proponents:
The Medicare for All Act of 2019 has many proponents. First, the Democrats have proposed that the universal care system would improve access to Medicare (Congress. Gove, 2020). Republicans and the government is likely to support this big move that would make Donald Trump establish a strong legacy. Many citizens and patients are likely to support this Act as it will reduce the burden of medical costs on them.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Legislation Comparison Grid and Testimony/Advocacy Statement
Opponents:
Insurance companies have expressed fear of either being wiped out or making lesser profits if the Medicare for All Act of 2019 is
passed into law and implemented. The Medicare for All Act of 2019 is likely to make the government have a monopoly over the American healthcare system (Holahan & Karpman, 2019). Additionally, if the Act is implemented may people may shift to get covered under Medicare for all leaving private insurance companies with just a few people. Therefore, private insurance companies are major opponents of the Medicare for All Act of 2019.
Target Population All American residents who seek medical services.
Status of the bill (Is it in hearings or committees? Is it receiving press coverage?) 27/2/2019: The bill was introduced to Congress and is in the first stage of the legislative process.
27/2/2019: Referred to the Committees that debate the bill before sending to the senate.
General Notes/Comments
The bill is still in the first stage of the process. A committees held a business meeting about the bill on 10th Dec 2019 but still with the committees (Congress. Gove, 2020). The bill must pass the committee, pass the House, pass Senate then signed by the President into law.
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: Legislation Comparison Grid and Testimony/Advocacy Statement
Title: Legislation Comparison Grid and Testimony/Advocacy Statement
Part 2: Testimony/Advocacy Statement
This advocacy statement addresses the Medicare for All Act of 2019 that may also be referred to as H.R. 1384. The United States has
been experiencing increased cost of medication which has prevented many from receiving effective medical care. Many legislations have been enacted but none has achieved to solve the problem (Congress. Gove, 2020). The Affordable Care Act has made a significant improvement for the American healthcare system, however, the burden of medical cost is still felt by quite a number of American citizens. In order to remove the burden of medical costs from the citizens and improve equity in healthcare, this bill has been proposed to be the solution and long-awaited change.
Under President Donald Trump’s administration, the Medicare for All Act of 2019 was proposed. Pramila Jayapal a representative for Washington’s 7th congressional district presented this bill to the House on 27th February 2019 (Congress. Gove, 2020). The bill was referred to the committees and the first meeting about this bill happened on 10th Dec 2019, however, the bill has not been passed by the committee. This bill awaits to be passed by the Committee, the Congress, Senate, and then signed by the president. The proponents of the bill believe that if it is passed and signed into law by the president, the American citizens will enjoy cheap healthcare services which will improve access to medical services (Schulman & Milstein, 2019). The Medicare for All Act of 2019 has been proposed to comprehensively protect all American residents against the cost of healthcare and related services.
This bill receives both strong support as well as opposition. The majority of the Americans are likely to support the bill because they are the ones experiencing the high cost of medical care. Democrats and some Republicans have shown their support for the Act (Johnson et al., 2020). However, opponents of this bill are majorly private insurance companies which have expressed the fear of being wiped off the system. Other congressmen have also stated that the bill is a great threat to private insurers. The question is, who is the most important between the American people and the insurance companies? Of course, American citizens are the most important (Holahan & Karpman, 2019). Furthermore, the Act does not prevent private insurers from performing their mandates, therefore, they should find better ways of attracting more people to their system.
Personally, I support the bill because it will improve the health of many Americans by reducing the cost of care. As a provider, I have encountered several cases where patients cannot afford medications due to high prices (Grim, 2019). People have died and some have disabilities because they could not afford efficient care due to the high cost of medications. Therefore, I strongly believe that this bill will solve this issue of high medical costs once for all.
Legislation Comparison Grid and Testimony/Advocacy Statement Conclusion
American citizens have been experiencing rising medical costs. The bill was sponsored by Pramila Jayapal a representative for Washington’s 7th congressional district presented this bill to the House on 27th February 2019. The bill aims at protecting American residents against the high cost of healthcare services. Private insurance companies are major opponents. The bill will improve access to healthcare for all Americans if signed to law by the President.
Legislation Testimony/Advocacy Statement
In my opinion, the Affordable Care Act (H.R. 3962) is good since it offers an opportunity to get affordable, comprehensive health coverage and encourages high-quality care to patients regardless of their financial status. Notably, a huge difference is identified from the previous years before the approval of the Affordable Care Act in 2010. For instance, approximately 48 million Americans would incur a high cost of health coverage due to a lack of affordable health insurance (Collins et al., 2017). The high cost of health care directly impacts family shares of employer-based coverage, consumers, and business whereby the Affordable Care Act has helped solve the problem. Additionally, the Affordable care act has supported research by helping in tracking key health measures which reduce the disparities in health insurance coverage.
The Affordable Care Act opponents suggested that the bill eliminated the individual mandate by requiring the residents to pay a penalty or have health insurance, thus that more people entered the insurance market. I would address the issue that the penalty, inform of tax, is a way of setting discipline to the residents and encourage them to have health insurance cover for easy access to high and quality services (Galvani et al., 2020). For instance, by eliminating the penalty, an increase in the insurance premium will rise, limiting healthy people from securing insurance cover (Laureate Education, 2018). Additionally, the affordable care act bill helped expand Medicaid eligibility beyond families, thus raising the income threshold since it included low-income adults. Therefore, most people who gained health care coverage after the passage of the Affordable Care Act also get enrolled in Medicaid, thus proving its popularity.
Legislation Comparison Grid and Testimony/Advocacy Statement References
Collins, S. R., Gunja, M. Z., Doty, M. M., & Beutel, S. (2017). How the Affordable Care Act has improved Americans’ ability to buy health insurance on their own. Retrieved March, 29, 2017.
Galvani, A. P., Parpia, A. S., Foster, E. M., Singer, B. H., & Fitzpatrick, M. C. (2020).
Lopes Write Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Important information for writing discussion questions and participation
Welcome to class
Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to
I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.
Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.
If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.
Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.
Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.
I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!
Hi Class,
Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.
Contact me if you have any questions.
Important information on Writing a Discussion Question
- Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
- There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
- Include in-text citations in your response
- Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
- Follow APA-7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor
- A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
- Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
- Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
- Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
- Follow APA 7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
- Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
- Here are some helpful links
- Student paper example
- Citing Sources
- The Writing Center is a great resource