Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

HCA 827 Topic 8 Literature Review Resources

In this assignment, you will read and annotate potential sources on your dissertation topic

Successful completion of a doctoral dissertation requires significant amounts of independent reading on the research topic. By this point in the program, this reading should have allowed the doctoral learner/researcher to become familiar with the scope of the topic and to identify gaps or tensions within the existing literature on the topic. These gaps and tensions are now the focus of the dissertation research. In this assignment, you will read and annotate potential sources on your dissertation topic. Those demonstrating the most merit should be added to your electronic (e.g., RefWorks) list for potential inclusion in the literature review section of your dissertation.

HCA 827 Topic 8 Literature Review Resources

HCA 827 Topic 8 Literature Review Resources

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:In this assignment, you will read and annotate potential sources on your dissertation topic

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  • It is recommended that you engage in this activity throughout the duration of this course.
  • Instructors will be scoring your submission based on the number of unique sources identified in the list submitted.
  • Download the resource Literature Review Resources Tool and use it to complete the assignment.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  • Refer to the resource, “Preparing Annotated Bibliographies,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
  • You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Directions:

Read at least 10 empirical or scholarly professional articles on your dissertation topic.

In the “Literature Review Resources” document, provide the following for each source:

  1. The APA formatted citation.
  2. A brief annotation of the key points of the source.
  3. An indication of whether the source has been added to (Y) or excluded from (N) your electronic (e.g., RefWorks) list.Name:  Assignment Rubric
      Excellent Good Fair Poor
    Summarize your interpretation of the frequency data provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, and family income from prior month. 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

    The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, a summary of the frequency distributions for the variables presented.

    The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, the number of times the value occurs in the data.

    The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and an explanation of extreme values in describing intervals that sufficiently provides an analysis that fully supports the categorization of each variable value.

    The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the areas described.

    28 (28%) – 31 (31%)

    The response accurately summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented.

    The response accurately explains the number of times the value occurs in the data.

    The response accurately explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and explains extreme values in describing intervals that provides an analysis which supports the categorization of each variable value.

    The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the areas described.

    25 (25%) – 27 (27%)

    The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented.

    The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the number of times the value occurs in the data.

    The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and inaccurately or vaguely explains extreme values.

    An analysis that may support the categorization of each variable value is inaccurate or vague.

    The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the areas described.

    0 (0%) – 24 (24%)

    The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented, or it is missing.

    The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the number of times the value occurs in the data, or it is missing.

    The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and an explanation of extreme values, or it is missing.

    An analysis that does not support the categorization of each variable values is provided, or it is missing.

    The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the areas described, or it is missing.

    Summarize your interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, race and ethnicity, currently employed, and family income from prior month. 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

    The response accurately and clearly summarizes in detail the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided.

    The response accurately and clearly evaluates in detail each of the variables presented, including an accurate and complete description of the sample size, the mean, the median, standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data.

    40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

    The response accurately summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided.

    The response accurately explains evaluates each of the variables presented, including an accurate description of the sample size, the mean, the median, standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data.

    35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

    The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided.

    The response inaccurately or vaguely evaluates each of the variables presented, including an inaccurate or vague description of the sample size, the mean, the median, the standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data.

    0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

    The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided, or it is missing.

    The response inaccurately and vaguely evaluates each of the variables presented, including an inaccurate and vague description of the sample size, the mean, the median, the standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data, or it is missing.

    Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
    Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.
    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

    A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

    4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

    Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

    3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

    Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

    0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

    No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

    Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
    Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

    Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

    4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

    Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

    3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

    Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

    0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

    Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

    Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

    Uses correct APA format with no errors.

    4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

    Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.

    3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

    Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.

    0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

    Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

    Total Points: 100

    Name:  Assignment Rubric

     

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.