HSS 261 Unit 2 Discussion Board
HSS 261 Unit 2 Discussion Board
Unit 2 Discussion
The American Dental Hygienists Association implores dental practitioners to adhere to certain core values to address any ethical situations and dilemmas that may arise in their practice environment. These include autonomy, confidentiality, societal trust, non-maleficence, justice and fairness, beneficence and veracity or telling the truth (Jill Day et al., 2018). Imperatively, when dental practitioners like in this scenario face ethical dilemmas, they need to consider these aspects to deal with such situations. Prescription of pain medications or opioids as demanded by patients requires one to consider the underlying professional conduct and guiding principles to avert possible addiction demands by patients.
In this case, the dentist must consider ethical principles that include autonomy, beneficence, veracity, and social trust. While the patient has the autonomy to demand what they want from the practitioner, the dentist has a duty of care and provide benefits to the individual and not harm them (Lee et al., 2018). Further, veracity implores on the practitioner to tell the patient the truth and ask him only to use the prescribed drugs to relieve his pain and not what he demands for as it may constitute use of opioids. Societal trust implies that the practitioner should value the trust with the patient and ensure that the public trusts the professional based on her actions and behaviors (American College of Dentists, 2018). Therefore, she must consider all these ethical principles. The steps of ethical decision-making process that the dentist should use include defining the issue, getting resources, brainstorming on the possible solution, evaluation of the alternative and making a decision and implementing it as well as its evaluation.
In this case, the best ethical decision is to have the patient understand that as a dentist, one may not have the power to prescribe certain schedules of drugs, including certain groups of pain relievers or opioids. Therefore, the patient should accept to purchase the pain killers prescribed or be made to understand that what he paid for has catered for certain procedures in the facility and cannot be refunded.
HSS 261 Unit 2 Discussion Board References
American College of Dentists. (2018, May 10). ACD ethical dilemma–patient in pain [Video].
YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NlBhxLLBRw
Jill Day, B. G. S., LDA, R., & Sarah Stream, B. A. (2018). Ethics in the Dental Office:
Autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice should guide your decisions. Dental Assistant, 87(4), 8-9.
Lee, H., Chalmers, N. I., Brow, A., Boynes, S., Monopoli, M., Doherty, M., … & Engineer, L.
(2018). Person-centered care model in dentistry. BMC Oral Health, 18(1), 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0661-9
Assignment Details
Assignment Description
Primary Discussion Response is due by Thursday (11:59:59pm Central), Peer Responses are due by Saturday (11:59:59pm Central).
Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 250 words that respond to the following questions with your
thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. You are required to use 1 scholarly resource in addition to your textbook. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.
You are explaining to new staff nurses that they have to ensure patient privacy and confidentiality when using patient information from the healthcare information system. For this assignment, address the following:
- Describe a situation in which you have had to make an ethical decision or invoke a regulation when deciding how to ensure patient privacy and confidentiality in the use of information from an information system in a healthcare setting.
- Describe the ethical dilemma.
- Describe what you did and your rationale for your action(s).
- Did the situation involve others from the healthcare team (e.g., physician, aide, therapists, and so on), and how did your decision and action affect the others on the team?
Responses to Other Students: Respond to at least 2 of your fellow classmates with at least a 100-word reply about their Primary Task Response regarding items you found to be compelling and enlightening. To help you with your discussion, please consider the following question:
- Do you agree with the person’s actions and rationale? Why or why not?
HSS 261 Unit 2 Discussion Board Rubric
The Discussion Board Grading Rubric is a scoring tool that represents the performance expectations for the discussion. This Discussion Board Grading Rubric is divided into components that provide a clear description of what should be included within each component of the discussion. It is the road map that can help lead your discussion. Discussion Board Grading Rubric
For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.
| Discussion Board Rubric | |||
| Expectation | Weight | % Score Earned | Comments |
| Support From Literature: Support from current literature (less than 5 years old) is present and includes a minimum of one scholarly in-text citation and matching reference for each topic. | 20% | 20% | |
| Application of Course Knowledge: Post contributes unique perspectives or insights gleaned from personal experience or examples from healthcare field. | 30% | 30% | |
| Organization: Post presents information in logical, meaningful, and understandable sequence, clearly relevant to discussion topic. | 20% | 20% | |
| Interactive Dialogue: Responds substantively to two posts from student peers that are topic-related. A substantive post adds content or insights or asks a question that will add to the learning experience and/or generate discussion. | 20% | 20% | |
| Grammar, Syntax, APA: APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate or with no errors. | 10% | 10% | |
| Total Percentage | 100% | 100% | |
| Possible Points | 50 | ||
| Points Earned | 50 | ||