HRM 635 Topic 2 DQ 2 discuss both the reliability and validity as they relate to recruitment and selection practices

Sample Answer for HRM 635 Topic 2 DQ 2 discuss both the reliability and validity as they relate to recruitment and selection practices Included After Question

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: HRM 635 Topic 2 DQ 2 discuss both the reliability and validity as they relate to recruitment and selection practices

Title: HRM 635 Topic 2 DQ 2 discuss both the reliability and validity as they relate to recruitment and selection practices

HRM 635 Topic 2 DQ 2 discuss both the reliability and validity as they relate to recruitment and selection practices

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: HRM 635 Topic 2 DQ 2 discuss both the reliability and validity as they relate to recruitment and selection practices

Topic 2 DQ 2

Apr 14-18, 2022

Assume that you were rejected for a position you applied to, based on their selection methods used. In general, discuss both the reliability and validity as they relate to recruitment and selection practices. Why are both factors critical when considering which selection method to use in making hiring decisions? Lastly, critically evaluate both the reliability and the validity of your firm’s current recruitment and selection process.

REPLY TO DISCUSSION

Lis Torres Torres

Posted Date

Apr 19, 2022, 9:50 PM

Unread

Replies to Lis Torres Torres

In past job search experience, every institution uses their designed job application system for example career search website platform or the same institution website. Also, every job position posted had a job description and specific qualifications for what the institution is needing to find. This helps narrow down qualifying applicants.

Reliability and validity both relate to recruitment and selection of practice. Deesler (2017) states that reliability is the selection tool’s first requirement and refers to its consistency and validity tells you whether the test is measuring what you think it’s supposed to be measuring. Both factors are important when considering a job position since the testing scores completed during the job application and recruitment process will show the best candidate for the position. The VA employee recruitment and selection process are extremely extensive. The first process is to complete the online application. If your resume matches the job position and description, then your application

HRM 635 Topic 2 DQ 2 discuss both the reliability and validity as they relate to recruitment and selection practices

moves to the second phase of the interview. If selected, then you are moved to the criminal background process which can take up to 6 months. This process is extremely long for future candidates to wait to start a job position.

Dessler, G. (2017). Human Resource Management. (5th ed.) Pearson.

https://bibliu.com/app/#/view/books/9780134237268/epub/OPS/xhtml/fileP7000499205000000000000000013D02.html#page_320

Robert Rupe

replied toLis Torres Torres

Apr 20, 2022, 6:03 PM

Unread

Replies to Lis Torres Torres

I like your comments here. As I mentioned regarding a long drawn out process when it comes to selection, it can be both good or bad and it depends on many factors. However, sometimes a long process can mean that the process itself is not working well. It is possible to send the wrong signal to potential candidates. Knowing this there are things that the recruiting team can do to prevent this misconception.

What are some specific things you would implement to prevent candidates from making the wrong assumption that the process is broken? Does this negative perception hurt the company and its ability to attract other candidates?

-Dr.R

Victoria Oleka

replied toLis Torres Torres

Apr 20, 2022, 9:12 PM

Unread

Replies to Lis Torres Torres

My dear Lis,

Thank you, for bringing out the risks of a delayed recruitment process, which is a serious problem. For me, the risks of a delayed recruitment process include a negative impact on business productivity, revenue existing employees’ engagement and company reputation. When business success depends on building teams of skilled and highly talented professionals, companies need to act fast to secure finding and hiring the ideal job candidates, or they risk losing them to the competition. Slow hiring practices, which result in lengthy delays to the recruitment process, can bring a series of negative consequences for the company. Moreover, job vacancies left for prolonged periods, can place an excess and unwelcome strain on existing teams, because of increased workloads, knowledge gaps, and skill shortfalls. At the same time, company revenue suffers, when vacant roles lead to reduced sales, ineffective customer service experiences, and poor performance through lack of project of project or team management. And also, there is that tendency of missing out on top candidates, which is a result of the common risk of a delayed recruitment process. In addition, unfilled positions can cause workforce’s to feel overworked with less resources, resulting in decreased motivation, lower morale and a potential increase in staff turnover. Thank you, Lis, and God bless you.

Constantine Dapilma

Posted Date

Apr 19, 2022, 10:10 AM

Status

Published

Replies to Lis Torres Torres

Organizations always look forward to recruiting the best employees available. Doing so ensures that employees can perform everyday roles as expected and the organization’s productivity stays at optimal levels. As a result, human resource managers and other recruiting personnel usually reject many applicants during the selection process. Poor performance during an interview is a common rejection consideration. Reliability and validity are critical for the selection process to get the right employees.

Reliability measures the consistency of the selection process. As Stewart and Brown (2019) put it, reliability in employee selection implies that methods, tests, and results do not differ with time, place, and the subjects. In this case, applicants being tested on their ability to perform a certain role should be assessed using one method. Reliability is usually measured through selection scores and on-the-job performance ratings (Amos et al., 2021). On the other hand, validity represents the extent to which a selection method measures what it is intended to measure (Azmi, 2019). For instance, a method testing a nurse’s ability to use electronic health records can test them practically. Reliability and validity are critical when considering the method to use in making hiring decisions since an applicant’s score should be directly proportional to their performance ability.

Organizations use different methods to select potential employees. My firm primarily relies on interviews during the selection process. Regarding reliability, it is possible to use interviews consistently without issues related to time, place, or subjects. Many potential

employees can be interviewed orally and get consistent results. Interviews can also include a section where employees demonstrate their ability to perform a task practically. Such sections improve the validity of scores and ensure that interviews measure what they are designed to test accurately and consistently.

References

Amos, A. J., Lee, K., Sen Gupta, T., & Malau-Aduli, B. S. (2021). Systematic review of specialist selection methods with implications for diversity in the medical workforce. BMC medical education, 21(1), 448. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02685-w

Azmi, F. T. (2019). Strategic human resource management: text and cases. Cambridge University Press.

Stewart, G. L., & Brown, K. G. (2019). Human resource management. John Wiley & Sons.

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable	No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions. Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Application of Course Knowledge – Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources; Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources. Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content	Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson. Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson	Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post. Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life	Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category	5	4	3	2	0
Interactive Dialogue Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days. *(5 points possible per graded thread)*	Exceeds minimum post requirements Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days. Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days Replies to a question posed by a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days. The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty	Has only one post for the week Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments	Does not post to the thread No connections are made to the topic
	Minus 1 Point	Minus 2 Point	Minus 3 Point	Minus 4 Point	Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted. Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition	2-3 errors in APA format. Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors. Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.	4-5 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is somewhat focused.	6-7 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.	8-10 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.	Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format. Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style does not facilitate communication. The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
	0 points lost				-5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements *per discussion thread*	The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.				The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement *per discussion thread*	The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.				The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

Also Read: HRM 635 Topic 2 DQ 1 What processes, procedures, and specific websites are currently being used in your organization to attract and acquire potential employees from the online setting?