HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment
Sample Answer for HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment Included After Question
Assessment Description
The purpose of this assignment is to use a Fishbone Diagram to complete a root cause analysis. Identify a problem in your practice environment and utilize the “Fishbone Analysis Diagram Template” to work through the problem to the root cause. Refer to “Problem-Solving Your Fishbone Into a Wishbone,” located in the topic Resources to complete this assignment.
While APA style is not required for Part 1, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
Prepare Part 2 of the template according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment
Title: HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment
Fishbone Analysis Diagram
Part 1: Identify a problem in your practice environment. Use the Fishbone Analysis Diagram to conduct a root cause analysis.
Part 2: In 300-500 words, address the following:
What is the benefit of a root cause analysis in health care quality and safety? How does it mitigate risk?
Root cause analysis is important in health care quality and safety because it helps identify issues that contribute to incidents in the provision of patient care services. Healthcare teams can use the information from root cause analysis to identify system and process issues that must be addressed to prevent the occurrence of similar incidences in the future. Root cause analysis also helps health organizations to streamline their systems and processes to influence outcomes. Organizations can identify bottlenecks from the root cause analysis and adopt responsive strategies to improve performance and competitiveness (Stanley et al., 2022). Root cause analysis mitigates risk by ensuring the organization remains ahead in preventing factors that increase the potential of adverse events in the organization. It also streamlines organizational systems and processes for enhanced safety and quality of patient care.
Identify quality indicators for the selected problem and discuss their associated measurement strategies.
The quality indicators for medication administration errors include the rates of medication administration errors, harm from medication administration errors, hospitalization costs, length of hospital stay due to medication administration errors, and mortality rates. Effective measurement strategies that can be adopted to measure these quality indicators include pre- and post-intervention implementation data to determine the effectiveness of change (Grace, 2022). For example, the rates of medication administration errors before a change can be compared with those obtained after the change to determine the change impacts on the measures.
Describe the purpose of progress tracking in project management.
Progress tracking in project management helps determine if the project is in its course or not. The tracking of the project helps the management team to identify any variances and implement responsive strategies for the realization of the desired project outcomes. Project tracking also promotes efficiency. It ensures the appropriate use of the allocated resources for the project. Project tracking also ensures accountability and transparency (Moran et al., 2023). The project management team can account for any changes in the project’s course and reasons for new strategies or resources used in the project.
Describe how to identify project adjustments and when it is best to implement them.
Project adjustments can be identified by comparing project progress and outcomes at a given point and comparing them with the benchmark data. Any variances from the projected project progress and outcomes will necessitate project adjustments. It is best to implement project adjustments at the point at which the team notes project variances (Grace, 2022). This will bring back the project to its course and eliminate inefficiencies.
References
Grace, P. J. (2022). Nursing Ethics and Professional Responsibility in Advanced Practice. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Moran, K. J., Burson, R., & Conrad, D. (2023). The Doctor of Nursing Practice Project: A Framework for Success. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Stanley, D., Bennett, C. L., & James, A. H. (2022). Clinical Leadership in Nursing and Healthcare. John Wiley & Sons.
Resources
Collapse All
Problem-Solving Your Fishbone Into a Wishbone
Read “Problem-Solving Your Fishbone Into a Wishbone,” located on the Vanguard Communications website (2018) for successful comple
… Read More
https://vanguardcommunications.net/fishbone-problem-solving/
Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse
Read Chapter 6 in Project Management for the Advanced Practice Nurse.
View Resource
Fishbone Analysis Diagram Template
Utilize the “Fishbone Analysis Diagram Template” to complete the topic assignment.
Fishbone Diagram – Rubric
Collapse All
Fishbone Diagram
40 points
Criteria Description
Fishbone Diagram
- 5: Excellent
40 points
The Fishbone Analysis Diagram is present and includes substantial relevant details.
- 4: Good
36.8 points
The Fishbone Analysis Diagram is present and includes relevant details.
- 3: Satisfactory
35.2 points
The Fishbone Analysis Diagram is present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
32 points
The Fishbone Analysis Diagram is complete but lacks detail or is incomplete.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The Fishbone Analysis Diagram is not complete or is incorrect.
Progress Tracking in Project Management
15 points
Criteria Description
Progress Tracking in Project Management
- 5: Excellent
15 points
A description of the purpose of progress tracking in project management is present and thorough.
- 4: Good
13.8 points
A description of the purpose of progress tracking in project management is present and detailed.
- 3: Satisfactory
13.2 points
A description of the purpose of progress tracking in project management is present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
12 points
A description of the purpose of progress tracking in project management is present back lacks detail or is incomplete.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: HQS 620 Fishbone Diagram Assignment
A description of the purpose of progress tracking in project management is not present.
Implementing Project Adjustments
15 points
Criteria Description
Implementing Project Adjustments
- 5: Excellent
15 points
A description of the how and when it is best to implement project adjustments is present and thorough.
- 4: Good
13.8 points
A description of the how and when it is best to implement project adjustments is present and detailed.
- 3: Satisfactory
13.2 points
A description of the how and when it is best to implement project adjustments is present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
12 points
A description of the how and when it is best to implement project adjustments is present back lacks detail or is incomplete.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of the how and when it is best to implement project adjustments is not present.
Thesis Development and Purpose
7 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
- 5: Excellent
7 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
- 4: Good
6.44 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
- 3: Satisfactory
6.16 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
5.6 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Argument Logic and Construction
8 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
- 5: Excellent
8 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
- 4: Good
7.36 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
- 3: Satisfactory
7.04 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.4 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
- 5: Excellent
5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
- 4: Good
4.6 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
- 3: Satisfactory
4.4 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
- 5: Excellent
5 points
All format elements are correct.
- 4: Good
4.6 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
- 3: Satisfactory
4.4 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources
5 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
- 5: Excellent
5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
- 4: Good
4.6 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
- 3: Satisfactory
4.4 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
- 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
- 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.