HLT 362V Week 4 Discussion Question 2 What Is An Interaction 

HLT 362V Week 4 Discussion Question 2 What Is An Interaction

Sample Answer for HLT 362V Week 4 Discussion Question 2 What Is An Interaction Included After Question

HLT 362V Week 4 Discussion Question 2 What Is An Interaction

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:HLT 362V Week 4 Discussion Question 2 What Is An Interaction 

What is an interaction? Describe an example; what are the variables within your population (work, social, academic,

HLT 362V Week 4 Discussion Question 2 What Is An Interaction
HLT 362V Week 4 Discussion Question 2 What Is An Interaction

etc.) for which you might expect interactions?

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:HLT 362V Week 4 Discussion Question 2 What Is An Interaction

 

 

 

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0
Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0
Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
  Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost       -5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

Also Read: HLT 362V Week 4 Discussion Question 1 If The Result Of An ANOVA Experiment Was “not Significant” 

As we begin this session, I would like to take this opportunity to clarify my expectations for this course:

Please note that GCU Online weeks run from Thursday (Day 1) through Wednesday (Day 7).

 

Course Room Etiquette:

  • It is my expectation that all learners will respect the thoughts and ideas presented in the discussions.
  • All postings should be presented in a respectful, professional manner. Remember – different points of view add richness and depth to the course!

 

Office Hours:

  • My office hours vary so feel free to shoot me an email at Kelly.[email protected] or my office phone is 602.639.6517 and I will get back to you within one business day or as soon as possible.
  • Phone appointments can be scheduled as well. Send me an email and the best time to call you, along with your phone number to make an appointment.
  • I welcome all inquiries and questions as we spend this term together. My preference is that everyone utilizes the Questions to Instructor forum. In the event your question is of a personal nature, please feel free to post in the Individual Questions for Instructor forum I will respond to all posts or emails within 24 or sooner.

 

Late Policy and Grading Policy

Discussion questions:

  • I do not mark off for late DQ’s.
  •  I would rather you take the time to read the materials and respond to the DQ’s in a scholarly way, demonstrating your understanding of the materials.
  • I will not accept any DQ submissions after day 7, 11:59 PM (AZ Time) of the week.
  • Individual written assignments – due by 11:59 PM AZ Time Zone on the due dates indicated for each class deliverable.

Assignments:

  • Assignments turned in after their specified due dates are subject to a late penalty of -10%, each day late, of the available credit. Please refer to the student academic handbook and GCU policy.
  • Any activity or assignment submitted after the due date will be subject to GCU’s late policy
  • Extenuating circumstances may justify exceptions, which are at my sole discretion. If an extenuating circumstance should arise, please contact me privately as soon as possible.
  • No assignments can be accepted for grading after midnight on the final day of class.
  • All assignments will be graded in accordance with the Assignment Grading Rubrics

Participation

  • Participation in each week’s Discussion Board forum accounts for a large percentage of your final grade in this course.
  • Please review the Course Syllabus for a comprehensive overview of course deliverables and the value associated with each.
  • It is my expectation that each of you will substantially contribute to the course discussion forums and respond to the posts of at least three other learners.
  • substantive post should be at least 200 words. Responses such as “great posts” or “I agree” do not meet the active engagement expectation.
  • Please feel free to draw on personal examples as you develop your responses to the Discussion Questions but you do need to demonstrate your understanding of the materials.
  • I do expect outside sources as well as class materials to formulate your post.
  • APA format is not necessary for DQ responses, but I do expect a proper citation for references.
  • Please use peer-related journals found through the GCU library and/or class materials to formulate your answers. Do not try to “Google” DQ’s as I am looking for class materials and examples from the weekly materials.
  • will not accept responses that are from Wikipedia, Business dictionary.com, or other popular business websites. You will not receive credit for generic web searches – this does not demonstrate graduate-level research.
  • Stay away from the use of personal pronouns when writing. As a graduate student, you are expected to write based on research and gathering of facts. Demonstrating your understanding of the materials is what you will be graded on. You will be marked down for lack of evidence to support your ideas.

Plagiarism

  • Plagiarism is the act of claiming credit for another’s work, accomplishments, or ideas without appropriate acknowledgment of the source of the information by including in-text citations and references.
  • This course requires the utilization of APA format for all course deliverables as noted in the course syllabus.
  • Whether this happens deliberately or inadvertently, whenever plagiarism has occurred, you have committed a Code of Conduct violation.
  • Please review your LopesWrite report prior to final submission.
  • Every act of plagiarism, no matter the severity, must be reported to the GCU administration (this includes your DQ’s, posts to your peers, and your papers).

Plagiarism includes:

  • Representing the ideas, expressions, or materials of another without due credit.
  • Paraphrasing or condensing ideas from another person’s work without proper citation and referencing.
  • Failing to document direct quotations without proper citation and referencing.
  • Depending upon the amount, severity, and frequency of the plagiarism that is committed, students may receive in-class penalties that range from coaching (for a minor omission), -20% grade penalties for resubmission, or zero credit for a specific assignment. University-level penalties may also occur, including suspension or even expulsion from the University.
  • If you are at all uncertain about what constitutes plagiarism, you should review the resources available in the Student Success Center. Also, please review the University’s policies about plagiarism which are covered in more detail in the GCU Catalog and the Student Handbook.
  • We will be utilizing the GCU APA Style Guide 7th edition located in the Student Success Center > The Writing Center for all course deliverables.

LopesWrite

  • All course assignments must be uploaded to the specific Module Assignment Drop Box, and also submitted to LopesWrite every week.
  • Please ensure that your assignment is uploaded to both locations under the Assignments DropBox. Detailed instructions for using LopesWrite are located in the Student Success Center.

Assignment Submissions

  • Please note that Microsoft Office is the software requirement at GCU.
  • I can open Word files or any file that is saved with a .rtf (Rich Text Format) extension. I am unable to open .wps files.
  • If you are using a “.wps” word processor, please save your files using the .rtf extension that is available from the drop-down box before uploading your files to the Assignment Drop Box.

Grade of Incomplete

  • The final grade of Incomplete is granted at the discretion of the instructor; however, students must meet certain specific criteria before this grade accommodation is even possible to consider.
  • The grade of Incomplete is reserved for times when students experience a serious extenuating circumstance or a crisis during the last week of class which prevents the completion of course requirements before the close of the grading period. Students also must pass the course at the time the request is made.
  • Please contact me personally if you are having difficulties in meeting course requirements or class deadlines during our time together. In addition, if you are experiencing personal challenges or difficulties, it is best to contact the Academic Counselor so that you can discuss the options that might be available to you, as well as each option’s academic and financial repercussions.

Grade Disputes

  • If you have any questions about a grade you have earned on an individual assignment or activity, please get in touch with me personally for further clarification.
  • While I have made every attempt to grade you fairly, on occasion a misunderstanding may occur, so please allow me the opportunity to learn your perspective if you believe this has occurred. Together, we should be able to resolve grading issues on individual assignments.
  • However, after we have discussed individual assignments’ point scores, if you still believe that the final grade you have earned at the end of the course is not commensurate with the quality of work you produced for this class, there is a formal Grade Grievance procedure which is outlined in the GCU Catalog and Student Handbook.

 

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: HLT 362V Week 4 Discussion Question 2 What Is An Interaction 

Title: HLT 362V Week 4 Discussion Question 2 What Is An Interaction 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quality Improvement Proposal 

 

 

Student’s Name 

Institutional Affiliation 

Course Name 

Lecturer’s Name 

Date 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quality Improvement Proposal 

Quality improvement is an important part of operations in the healthcare systems. Most healthcare institutions often conduct quality improvements to enhance the quality of treatment processes and effective patient outcomes. Also, quality improvements are often made to enhance safety and efficiency in the treatment processes. Quality improvement processes usually involve redesigning operational systems to adopt new practices that are critical in achieving effective and quality treatment outcomes. While undertaking quality improvement processes, there is always the need to consider different resources available and how they can enhance overall success. Quality improvement processes should always be based on evidence-based practices and research. In other words, before undertaking quality improvement processes, there is always the need for healthcare management or clinical expertise to engage in the research processes to identify the areas that require adjustments. Before engaging in the quality improvement processes, the researchers always need to identify healthcare problems that are causing inefficiencies in the healthcare operational processes. In other words, quality improvement processes should be based on the selected research problems and the complete tools that can be dedicated to the healthcare process’s general success.        

Overview of the Problem 

Healthcare data breach is one of the main problems facing healthcare systems. Data breach often results from poor management of patient information or data. With the emergence of cyber insecurities across different sectors, organizations need to consider training processes to equip healthcare professionals with advanced nursing analytics knowledge. Healthcare data breach continues to cause a lot of problems in different healthcare institutions. Most of the patients cannot receive adequate treatment processes and medications due to poor management of data in various healthcare facilities. Also, loss of patient’s data can sometimes lead to the administration of wrong treatments or medications. With the current increase in cybercrime activities, healthcare institutions must engage in serious protection of their databases to protect patient’s information. Data breach is becoming costly to most healthcare institutions. Healthcare data breaches accounted for about 26% of all the breaches recorded in the year 2016. On the other hand, close to 25% have had their medical data or information compromised. The data breaches are always caused by hackers who have the motive of gaining in the process. The healthcare data obtained by hackers are highly valued for financial, personal, and medical gains.    

Why Quality Improvement Initiative is needed in the 

Area of Medication Management 

   The quality improvement initiative is needed in the area of data management to reduce the cases of data breach, which lead to treatment errors and compromise to patient information. With the safety of data, patients may become assured of the privacy of their information. Also, they may become confident in the treatment processes. For private healthcare organizations, quality improvements are required to manage patient data to avoid losing potential clients. With the increase in cybercrime, healthcare institutions ought to put their databases in order and secure to avoid falling into cybercriminals or hackers’ traps. Quality improvement processes are also required in the area of data management to enhance efficiency in the operational processes. With an effective database, healthcare professionals can efficiently obtain the data required in facilitating the treatment processes. Some of the quality improvement approaches to curb the data healthcare data breach may include applying an effective and secure database, enhancing data management processes, and continuous training of the healthcare staff on the effective management of data and patient information. 

  Training of staff on the data management processes and recruiting competent data managers are some of the quality improvement initiatives that will ensure that patients’ data are well protected. Also, the application of safe and secure equipment in patient information management is a critical approach to quality improvements. While using technology, the management should always ensure that systems used are trustable and free from possible breaches (Angst et al., 2017). Quality improvements in data management are important for most healthcare organizations in ensuring the patient’s information’s safety and security. Healthcare organizations should be currently involved in the search for innovative approaches in managing patient information and data. 

How the Results of Previous Research Demonstrate Support For The 

Quality Improvement Initiative and Its Projected Outcomes 

There are different previous research outcomes that show that data breach management is significant in ensuring quality outcomes in the healthcare processes, safety, and security of patient’s information. According to McLeod and Dolezel (2018), management of effective patient information management is key in ensuring smooth operational processes. Also, the quality improvement strategy, i.e., the protection of the databases and patient’s data, is critical, ensuring smooth operational processes. The research conducted by Kruse et al. (2017) also suggests that approaches towards the management of databases are a critical quality improvement initiative that can ensure that there are quality operational processes. Further, the research also stipulates that effective management of patient information is one way of preventing cyber threats. Finally, the study undertaken by Abouelmehdi et al. (2018) shows that controlling data breaches through engaging in quality improvement initiatives is critical in promoting quality and effective healthcare outcomes. 

Steps Necessary to Implement the Quality Improvement Initiative 

The first step in implementing the quality improvement initiative involves prioritizing and listing the possible improvement opportunities. In step one, the database management should always give priorities to areas that require immediate interventions or improvements. The second stage of quality improvement should involve identifying the measurable objectives that have been set by the quality improvement teams and the approaches that need to be undertaken in quality improvement. The third step in quality improvement is the definition of the requirements and the appropriate approaches needed to achieve the entire process of quality improvement. The fourth step should incorporate the collection and analysis of data to determine the suitability of viable solutions and the procedures that can work in the entire process of quality improvements. In the final step, the quality improvement task force ought to implement the solution provided after the process of research and data analysis and, thereafter, evaluate the results and extra or additional anticipated outcomes.        

Evaluation of Quality Improvement 

After the implementation of the quality improvement initiative, the evaluation processes are critical in ensuring that the approaches and procedures included are effective and operational. First, there will be testing of quality improvement strategy and the outcomes compared to the operational processes’ current practices. In case there is an improvement recorded after the comparison, the quality improvement initiative may be considered viable. The quality improvement initiative will also be considered for other quality improvement approaches that have been utilized within the organization. In the newly developed quality improvement is more efficient, then the previous methodologies may be rejected, and the new ones adopted to facilitate operational processes. In the process of evaluating quality improvement initiatives, there will be an application of statistical tests that will involve comparing independent and dependent variables. Also, in the process of data analysis, there will be the formulation of the null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis. To test the statistical significance, the student t-test will mostly be applied.    

Conclusion 

Quality improvement is critical to the success of the organization. However, the whole process of quality improvement requires huge funding and a large number of resources to be employed. Also, there is always the need to conduct research processes that involve the collection and analysis of data to ensure that the objectives of quality improvements are achieved. Quality improvement is meant to enhance efficiency, quality improvement, safety, and save costs associated with healthcare processes. Most healthcare institutions often conduct quality improvements to enhance the quality of treatment processes and effective patient outcomes. Also, quality improvements are often made to enhance safety and efficiency in the treatment processes. The quality improvement initiative is needed in the area of data management to reduce the cases of a data breach, which leads to treatment errors and compromise of the patient’s information.      

 

References 

Abouelmehdi, K., Beni-Hessane, A., & Khaloufi, H. (2018). Big healthcare data: Preserving security and privacy. Journal of Big Data, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-017-0110-7 

Angst, C. M., Block, E. S., D’arcy, J., & Kelley, K. (2017). When do IT security investments matter? Accounting for the influence of institutional factors in the context of healthcare data breaches. Accounting for the Influence of Institutional Factors in the Context of Healthcare Data Breaches (January 24, 2016). Angst, CM, Block, ES, D’Arcy, J., and Kelley, K, 893-916. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2858549 

Kruse, C. S., Frederick, B., Jacobson, T., & Monticone, D. K. (2017). Cybersecurity in healthcare: A systematic review of modern threats and trends. Technology and Health Care, 25(1), 1-10. doi: 10.3233/THC-161263. 

McLeod, A., & Dolezel, D. (2018). Cyber-analytics: Modeling factors associated with healthcare data breaches. Decision Support Systems, 108, 57-68. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2018.02.007