HLT 324 V Week 2 Family Interview – Compare And Contrast Cultures Paper  

HLT 324 V Week 2 Family Interview – Compare And Contrast Cultures Paper  

HLT 324 V Week 2 Family Interview – Compare And Contrast Cultures Paper

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:HLT 324 V Week 2 Family Interview – Compare And Contrast Cultures Paper  

Family Roles and Organization, Work Attitudes, and Communication

It is important to identify and understand your own family culture in order to be able to understand and respect other cultures. Interview a family member, and an individual from another culture with which you are unfamiliar. Some examples of an individual from another culture to consider for the assignment include a neighbor, coworker, patient, or friend. Please inform the individuals of the purpose of this assignment and make sure you receive their consent.

 

Interviews:

 

Review the “Family Interview” template prior to the interview. Additional space is designated on the template for you to create three additional questions to ask both interviewees (family member and person from another culture). Additional questions should be relevant to the readings or discussion and should provide value to the interview by helping to understand culture.

 

Some of the questions may include:

 

Family beliefs: Have they changed over generations?

 

Educational and occupational status in the culture and in the family

Communication methods: verbal and nonverbal

 

Current family goals/priorities

 

Family member roles and organizational systems

 

Spiritual beliefs: current practice and death and dying

 

Alternative lifestyles

 

Work attitudes and structure

 

Written Paper:

 

Using the “Family Interview” template, interview your designated family member and the person from another culture. Be sure to write your responses in a way that will assist you in writing your paper. After the interview is completed, write a paper of 750-1,000 words that includes the following:

 

An introductory paragraph with the reasons for selecting the interviewees.

 

A summary of the responses from the interview template gathered from the interviewees.

 

A comparison and contrast of your findings between the two interviewees.

 

A reflective concluding paragraph on how family roles affect the cultural domains and relationships for each individual.

General Requirements:

 

Submit both the completed “Family Interview” template and the written paper” to the instructor.

 

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

 

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

  • Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:HLT 324 V Week 2 Family Interview – Compare And Contrast Cultures Paper 

    HLT 324 V Week 2 Family Interview – Compare And Contrast Cultures Paper  
    HLT 324 V Week 2 Family Interview – Compare And Contrast Cultures Paper

     

     

     

    Grading Rubric

    Performance Category 100% or highest level of performance

    100%

    16 points

    		 Very good or high level of performance

    88%

    14 points

    		 Acceptable level of performance

    81%

    13 points

    		 Inadequate demonstration of expectations

    68%

    11 points

    		 Deficient level of performance

    56%

    9 points

     

    		 Failing level

    of performance

    55% or less

    0 points
     Total Points Possible= 50           16 Points    14 Points 13 Points        11 Points           9 Points          0 Points
    Scholarliness

    Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.

    		 Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

    • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
    • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
    • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
    • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
    		 Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

    • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
    • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
    • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
    • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
    		 Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

    • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
    • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
    • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
    • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
    		  

    Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

    • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
    • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
    • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
    • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
    		  

    Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

    • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
    • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
    • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
    • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
    		 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

    • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
    • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
    • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
    • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
     16 Points  14 Points  13 Points 11 Points 9 Points  0 Points
    Application of Course Knowledge

    Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

    		 Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

    • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
    • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
    • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
    		 Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

    • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
    • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
    • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
    		 Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

    • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
    • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
    • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
    		 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

    • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
    • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
    • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
    		 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

    • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
    • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
    • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
    		 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

    • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
    • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.
    • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
       10 Points 9 Points  6 Points  0 Points
    Interactive Dialogue

    Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)

    The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)

    Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.

    		 Demonstrated all of the following:

    • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
    • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
    • Responses are substantive
    • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
    		 Demonstrated 3 of the following:

    • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
    • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
    • Responses are substantive
    • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
    		 Demonstrated 2 of the following:

    • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
    • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
    • Responses are substantive
    • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
    		 Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

    • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
    • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
    • Responses are substantive
    • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
      8 Points 7 Points  6 Points         5 Points          4 Points  0 Points
    Grammar, Syntax, APA

    Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

    The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

    Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.

    		 The following was present:

    • 0-3 errors in APA format

    AND

    • Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

    AND

    • Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.
    		 The following was present:

    • 4-6 errors in APA format.

    AND/OR

    • Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

    AND/OR

    • Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.
    		 The following was present:

    • 7-9 errors in APA format.

    AND/OR

    • Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

    AND/OR

    • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.
    		  

    The following was present:

    • 10- 12 errors in APA format

    AND/OR

    • Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors

    AND/OR

    • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.
    		  

    The following was present:

    • 13 – 15 errors in APA format

    AND/OR

    • Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

    AND/OR

    • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.

    AND/OR

    • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.
    		 The following was present:

    • 16 to greater errors in APA format.

    AND/OR

    • Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

    AND/OR

    • Writing style does not facilitate communication
      0 Points Deducted 5 Points Lost
    Participation

    Requirements

    		Demonstrated the following:

    • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
    		 Failed to demonstrate the following:

    • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
      0 Points Lost 5 Points Lost
    Due Date Requirements Demonstrated all of the following:

    • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

    A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

    		Demonstrates one or less of the following.

    • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

    A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

    Also Read: HLT 324 V Week 2 Discussion 2 Health Care Practitioners 

As we begin this session, I would like to take this opportunity to clarify my expectations for this course:

Please note that GCU Online weeks run from Thursday (Day 1) through Wednesday (Day 7).

 

Course Room Etiquette:

  • It is my expectation that all learners will respect the thoughts and ideas presented in the discussions.
  • All postings should be presented in a respectful, professional manner. Remember – different points of view add richness and depth to the course!

 

Office Hours:

  • My office hours vary so feel free to shoot me an email at Kelly.Dellorusso1@my.gcu.edu or my office phone is 602.639.6517 and I will get back to you within one business day or as soon as possible.
  • Phone appointments can be scheduled as well. Send me an email and the best time to call you, along with your phone number to make an appointment.
  • I welcome all inquiries and questions as we spend this term together. My preference is that everyone utilizes the Questions to Instructor forum. In the event your question is of a personal nature, please feel free to post in the Individual Questions for Instructor forum I will respond to all posts or emails within 24 or sooner.

 

Late Policy and Grading Policy

Discussion questions:

  • I do not mark off for late DQ’s.
  •  I would rather you take the time to read the materials and respond to the DQ’s in a scholarly way, demonstrating your understanding of the materials.
  • I will not accept any DQ submissions after day 7, 11:59 PM (AZ Time) of the week.
  • Individual written assignments – due by 11:59 PM AZ Time Zone on the due dates indicated for each class deliverable.

Assignments:

  • Assignments turned in after their specified due dates are subject to a late penalty of -10%, each day late, of the available credit. Please refer to the student academic handbook and GCU policy.
  • Any activity or assignment submitted after the due date will be subject to GCU’s late policy
  • Extenuating circumstances may justify exceptions, which are at my sole discretion. If an extenuating circumstance should arise, please contact me privately as soon as possible.
  • No assignments can be accepted for grading after midnight on the final day of class.
  • All assignments will be graded in accordance with the Assignment Grading Rubrics

Participation

  • Participation in each week’s Discussion Board forum accounts for a large percentage of your final grade in this course.
  • Please review the Course Syllabus for a comprehensive overview of course deliverables and the value associated with each.
  • It is my expectation that each of you will substantially contribute to the course discussion forums and respond to the posts of at least three other learners.
  • A substantive post should be at least 200 words. Responses such as “great posts” or “I agree” do not meet the active engagement expectation.
  • Please feel free to draw on personal examples as you develop your responses to the Discussion Questions but you do need to demonstrate your understanding of the materials.
  • I do expect outside sources as well as class materials to formulate your post.
  • APA format is not necessary for DQ responses, but I do expect a proper citation for references.
  • Please use peer-related journals found through the GCU library and/or class materials to formulate your answers. Do not try to “Google” DQ’s as I am looking for class materials and examples from the weekly materials.
  • I will not accept responses that are from Wikipedia, Business dictionary.com, or other popular business websites. You will not receive credit for generic web searches – this does not demonstrate graduate-level research.
  • Stay away from the use of personal pronouns when writing. As a graduate student, you are expected to write based on research and gathering of facts. Demonstrating your understanding of the materials is what you will be graded on. You will be marked down for lack of evidence to support your ideas.

Plagiarism

  • Plagiarism is the act of claiming credit for another’s work, accomplishments, or ideas without appropriate acknowledgment of the source of the information by including in-text citations and references.
  • This course requires the utilization of APA format for all course deliverables as noted in the course syllabus.
  • Whether this happens deliberately or inadvertently, whenever plagiarism has occurred, you have committed a Code of Conduct violation.
  • Please review your LopesWrite report prior to final submission.
  • Every act of plagiarism, no matter the severity, must be reported to the GCU administration (this includes your DQ’s, posts to your peers, and your papers).

Plagiarism includes:

  • Representing the ideas, expressions, or materials of another without due credit.
  • Paraphrasing or condensing ideas from another person’s work without proper citation and referencing.
  • Failing to document direct quotations without proper citation and referencing.
  • Depending upon the amount, severity, and frequency of the plagiarism that is committed, students may receive in-class penalties that range from coaching (for a minor omission), -20% grade penalties for resubmission, or zero credit for a specific assignment. University-level penalties may also occur, including suspension or even expulsion from the University.
  • If you are at all uncertain about what constitutes plagiarism, you should review the resources available in the Student Success Center. Also, please review the University’s policies about plagiarism which are covered in more detail in the GCU Catalog and the Student Handbook.
  • We will be utilizing the GCU APA Style Guide 7th edition located in the Student Success Center > The Writing Center for all course deliverables.

LopesWrite

  • All course assignments must be uploaded to the specific Module Assignment Drop Box, and also submitted to LopesWrite every week.
  • Please ensure that your assignment is uploaded to both locations under the Assignments DropBox. Detailed instructions for using LopesWrite are located in the Student Success Center.

Assignment Submissions

  • Please note that Microsoft Office is the software requirement at GCU.
  • I can open Word files or any file that is saved with a .rtf (Rich Text Format) extension. I am unable to open .wps files.
  • If you are using a “.wps” word processor, please save your files using the .rtf extension that is available from the drop-down box before uploading your files to the Assignment Drop Box.

Grade of Incomplete

  • The final grade of Incomplete is granted at the discretion of the instructor; however, students must meet certain specific criteria before this grade accommodation is even possible to consider.
  • The grade of Incomplete is reserved for times when students experience a serious extenuating circumstance or a crisis during the last week of class which prevents the completion of course requirements before the close of the grading period. Students also must pass the course at the time the request is made.
  • Please contact me personally if you are having difficulties in meeting course requirements or class deadlines during our time together. In addition, if you are experiencing personal challenges or difficulties, it is best to contact the Academic Counselor so that you can discuss the options that might be available to you, as well as each option’s academic and financial repercussions.

Grade Disputes

  • If you have any questions about a grade you have earned on an individual assignment or activity, please get in touch with me personally for further clarification.
  • While I have made every attempt to grade you fairly, on occasion a misunderstanding may occur, so please allow me the opportunity to learn your perspective if you believe this has occurred. Together, we should be able to resolve grading issues on individual assignments.
  • However, after we have discussed individual assignments’ point scores, if you still believe that the final grade you have earned at the end of the course is not commensurate with the quality of work you produced for this class, there is a formal Grade Grievance procedure which is outlined in the GCU Catalog and Student Handbook.