Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

HLT 302 Topic 1 Discussion Question One

HLT 302 Topic 1 Discussion Question One

Read

While reading this week’s topics, I found scientism to be a very different point of view. Scientism is a viewpoint that “only science can provide us with knowledge or rational belief, that only science can tell us what exists and that only science can effectively address our moral and existential questions” (De Ridder, et al., 2018). Though science is helpful for finding a reason behind disease and healing, scientism focuses solely on science and does not take into account moral standing or values well known to Christianity. If a physician is involved in scientism, he or she is more likely to only be looking at the treatment of the disease, not the holistic treatment of the patient. Scientism leads people to believe that “no one can know anything about God” and no one can know about right and wrong because moral standing and ethics are lacking a place in scientism (Moreland, 2018).

What of disease and healing? The Christian worldview has a standing that because Adam and Eve sinned in the garden, humans now must experience disease and suffering. However, God is there to help us handle the suffering tossed our way and gives us promises in the bible. One such promise is in Dueteronomy. “Be strong and of good courage, fear not, nor be afraid of them: For the Lord thy God, he it is that doth go with thee, he will not fail thee, nor forsake thee” (The Holy Bible, KJV, n.d.). What that promise means to Christians is that though disease may torment, God will be there to get us through the trials. What of healing, then? Why are people sick and dying if God can heal? Though these questions are difficult to answer, the answer seems the lie in the understanding that we are a part of something much bigger than us. He is in control.

References:

De Ridder, J., Peels, R., & Van Woudenburg, R. (2018). Scientism prospects and problems. Oxford university press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=iWBmDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=what+is+scientism&ots=NpwTSvCOf9&sig=03MOkkq5-U0OTQPnOdieoLT02SY#v=onepage&q=what%20is%20scientism&f=false

Moreland, J.P. (2018). 10 things you should know about scientism. Crossway. https://www.crossway.org/articles/10-things-you-should-know-about-scientism/

The Holy Bible, KJV (n.d.). Authorized king james version. Thomas nelson bibles. www.thomasnelson.com

In preparation for the Personal Worldview Inventory assignment, identify the key components that that make up a worldview.

“Modern” and “post-modern” were terms that were developed in the 20th century. “Modern” is the term that describes the period from the 1890s to 1945, and “post-modern” refers to the period after the Second World War, mainly after 1968.

Modern is related to logical and rational thinking whereas post-modern has denied this logical thinking. While the modern approach was theoretical, objective and analytical, the post-modern approach was subjective.

HLT 302 Topic 1 Discussion Question One

HLT 302 Topic 1 Discussion Question One

The modernist was in search of an abstract truth of life whereas the post-modernist did not believe in abstract truth or in universal truth. In modernism, there was an attempt to develop a coherent worldview. But in post-modernism, there is an attempt to remove the differences between the high and the low.

A modern thinker believes in learning from the experiences of the past and also has much trust in the text that tells about the past. On the contrary, a post-modern thinker does not have such beliefs. The post-modernist thinks that the text that tells about the past is of no use in the present times.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: HLT 302 Topic 1 Discussion Question One

When a modern thinker analyses a subject by going deep into it, the post-modern thinker does not believe in in-depth analysis. A post-modern thinker bases his views on hyper-reality whereas the modern thinker only considered original works as genuine. A post-modern thinker considers morality as relative.

When considering the arts, modern and post-modern art have many differences. While modern art is based on elegance and simplicity, post-modern art is considered elaborate and decorative.

When modern philosophy is based on effect and cause, post-modern philosophy is based on chance only. When modern thinkers consider truth as objective, the post-modern thinkers consider truth as relative and socially based. It can also be seen that post-modernists involve politics in everything whereas modernists are not that political.

Summary:

1.“Modern” is the term that describes the period from the 1890s to 1945, and “post-modern” refers to the period after the Second World War, mainly after 1968.
2.While the modern approach was theoretical, objective and analytical, the post-modern approach was subjective.
3.A modern thinker believes in learning from experiences of the past and also has much trust in the text that tells about the past. On the contrary, a post-modern thinker does not have such beliefs.
4.While modern art is based on elegance and simplicity, post-modern art is considered elaborate and decorative.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: HLT 302 Topic 1 Discussion Question One

Replies to Alexander Sodipe

According to Bogue & Hogan (2020), a worldview is a lens that one uses to look at and understand the world around them and their personal experiences and historical events. In my worldview, spirituality is an individualized belief concept and practice of faith on supernatural beings. It involves recognizing a feeling or a belief that there is an existence of other things in this world beyond human reasoning. My spiritual practice believes in Jesus Christ, the son of God. I believe that God is alive and provides my needs, including guidance, protestation, and other needs in life. I also believe in the resurrection, life after death.

By recognizing and respecting other people’s beliefs, including spirituality, has influenced the way nurses provide care to patients. Nurses should know their spirituality and not judge patients’ beliefs. Nurses should not let their beliefs affect how they care for patients’ emotional, spiritual, and physical needs. Thus, nurses satisfy these needs by showing sympathy to patients and their families, being there for them, ensuring freedom for patients to express their beliefs and values, and communicating with them effectively. It helps in offering the best quality of life for patients.

References:

Bogue, D.W. & Hogan, M. (2020). Grand Canyon University (Ed). Practicing dignity: An introduction to Christian values and decision making in health care. Retrieved from https://lc.gcumedia.com/phi413v/practicing-dignity-an-introduction-to-christian-values-and-decision-making-in-health-care/v1.1/#/chapter/1

Hawthorne, D. M., & Gordon, S. C. (2020). The Invisibility of Spiritual Nursing Care in Clinical Practice. Journal of Holistic Nursing : Official Journal of the American Holistic Nurses’ Association38(1), 147–155. https://doi.org /10.1177/0898010119889704

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.