HIM 301 Week 4 Case Studies  

HIM 301 Week 4 Case Studies

Sample Answer for HIM 301 Week 4 Case Studies Included After Question

HIM 301 Week 4 Case Studies

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:HIM 301 Week 4 Case Studies  

Prior to beginning work on this assignment review Chapters 21, 24, 25 and 27 of Health Informatics: An Interprofessional Approach.

Select two of the case studies located in the course textbook at the end of Chapters 21, 24, 25, or 27, and answer the questions associated with those case studies in a cohesive, APA-formatted paper.

Chapter 21:

  • Recommend where would you start to improve the user experience.
  • Pharmacists are asking for your help due to struggles with non-integrated systems. What methods would you use to examine this issue?
  • Describe how usability should be incorporated as part of the purchasing process for this institution.

Chapter 24:

  • Assuming that you are the clinical content manager leading reporting efforts, recommend the approach you would take to address the reporting problem.
  • Describe how the effort of changing preadmission testing data collection from paper to the Electronic Health Record System (EHR) can be approached.
  • Using Patient Safety and Quality Research Design (PSQRD) methodology, identifying area of quality improvement in the hospital setting, recommend a process plan and identify the expected outcomes.

Chapter 25:

  • Discuss whether the proposed course of action would be permissible under current fraud and abuse regulations.
  • Explain common issues related to the use of EHR and healthcare fraud.
  • Discuss how the proposed EHR could potentially facilitate healthcare fraud.

Chapter 27:

  • Describe the timeline of the program and its potential financial impact on the individual healthcare providers who are involved in meaningful use.
  • Explain the process that providers must complete to avoid payment penalties.
  • Explain the timeframe for the provider to achieve modified stage two and stage three measures.

The Week 4 Case Studies Papers

  • Must be three to four double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style
  • Must include a separate title page for each case study with the following:
    • Title of paper including the chapter number and case study title
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must utilize academic voice. See the Academic Voice (Links to an external site.) resource for additional guidance.
  • Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.
  • Must use at least two scholarly or credible sources in addition to the course text.
    • The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.) table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types.
    • Must document any information used from sources in APA style

    • Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:HIM 301 Week 4 Case Studies 

       

      HIM 301 Week 4 Case Studies
      HIM 301 Week 4 Case Studies

      A Sample Answer For the Assignment: HIM 301 Week 4 Case Studies

      Title: HIM 301 Week 4 Case Studies

      Grading Rubric

      Performance Category 100% or highest level of performance

      100%

      16 points

      		 Very good or high level of performance

      88%

      14 points

      		 Acceptable level of performance

      81%

      13 points

      		 Inadequate demonstration of expectations

      68%

      11 points

      		 Deficient level of performance

      56%

      9 points

       

      		 Failing level

      of performance

      55% or less

      0 points
       Total Points Possible= 50           16 Points    14 Points 13 Points        11 Points           9 Points          0 Points
      Scholarliness

      Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.

      		 Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

      • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
      • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
      • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
      • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
      		 Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

      • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
      • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
      • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
      • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
      		 Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

      • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
      • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
      • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
      • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
      		  

      Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

      • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
      • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
      • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
      • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
      		  

      Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

      • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
      • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
      • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
      • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
      		 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

      • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
      • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
      • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
      • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
       16 Points  14 Points  13 Points 11 Points 9 Points  0 Points
      Application of Course Knowledge

      Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

      		 Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

      • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
      • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
      • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
      		 Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

      • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
      • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
      • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
      		 Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

      • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
      • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
      • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
      		 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

      • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
      • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
      • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
      		 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

      • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
      • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
      • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
      		 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

      • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
      • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.
      • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
         10 Points 9 Points  6 Points  0 Points
      Interactive Dialogue

      Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)

      The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)

      Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.

      		 Demonstrated all of the following:

      • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
      • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
      • Responses are substantive
      • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
      		 Demonstrated 3 of the following:

      • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
      • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
      • Responses are substantive
      • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
      		 Demonstrated 2 of the following:

      • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
      • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
      • Responses are substantive
      • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
      		 Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

      • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
      • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
      • Responses are substantive
      • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
        8 Points 7 Points  6 Points         5 Points          4 Points  0 Points
      Grammar, Syntax, APA

      Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

      The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

      Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.

      		 The following was present:

      • 0-3 errors in APA format

      AND

      • Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

      AND

      • Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.
      		 The following was present:

      • 4-6 errors in APA format.

      AND/OR

      • Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

      AND/OR

      • Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.
      		 The following was present:

      • 7-9 errors in APA format.

      AND/OR

      • Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

      AND/OR

      • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.
      		  

      The following was present:

      • 10- 12 errors in APA format

      AND/OR

      • Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors

      AND/OR

      • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.
      		  

      The following was present:

      • 13 – 15 errors in APA format

      AND/OR

      • Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

      AND/OR

      • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.

      AND/OR

      • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.
      		 The following was present:

      • 16 to greater errors in APA format.

      AND/OR

      • Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

      AND/OR

      • Writing style does not facilitate communication
        0 Points Deducted 5 Points Lost
      Participation

      Requirements

      		Demonstrated the following:

      • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
      		 Failed to demonstrate the following:

      • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
        0 Points Lost 5 Points Lost
      Due Date Requirements Demonstrated all of the following:

      • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

      A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

      		Demonstrates one or less of the following.

      • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

      A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

      Also Read: HIM 301 Week 4 Assignment 2 Enterprise Master Person Identification (EMPI) Policy