HI 6983 Research Project

HI 6983 Research Project Guidelines

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: HI 6983 Research Project

Title: HI 6983 Research Project

HI 6983 Research Project

Overview:

This course is designed to create an opportunity for students to explore the practical side of health informatics by being actively involved in all aspects of a capstone project. Students work with the course instructor to develop a research proposal, implement the project, and report the findings. Proposal All projects require a written proposal that has been approved by the student and faculty. Students are expected to produce the proposal draft and submit to course instructor for comments and revision until it is acceptable. Part of this process is to schedule a meeting with the faculty member prior to submitting the proposal to discuss options. Proposal outline: The written proposal should follow the general outline below. Proposal length should be based on the breadth of the project proposed, typically 1-2 pages (double-spaced). 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Introduction: brief overview of relevant literature including citations following the format, style, and tone of a peer-reviewed journal in the field of study (APA). The last paragraph should provide a clear and concise statement of the problem and overall rationale/justification for the project. Specific Objectives: include a bullet list of specific research objectives, stated as testable hypotheses where appropriate. Methods: detailed description of research scope, design, and methodology. In other words, how will you find the information that you will report? This section should include planned statistical analyses, if applicable. Expected Results: use figures and tables to show the types of data and associated trends or patterns that are expected (these should be clearly labeled as “expected results” so that no one thinks the data are real). Research timeline: include a table or a Gantt Chart proposing the timing of the different aspects of the project along with a summary of estimated time commitments for the parts and project total. Implementation Throughout the course, students are expected to post weekly progress reports in the Discussion area of Blackboard and to contact the course instructor should there be any questions or need to deviate from the timeline submitted at the beginning of the course. Reporting Students are expected to report the results of their project by developing a formal presentation and a final report. It is a requirement for these reports to be submitted to the Graduate College upon completion. This will be done by the course instructor upon successful completion of the course. 1. Final report: A final report on the results of the research project is to be written following the format of a journal appropriate for the topic (APA format). The final report should be in language that is of a research quality and could be submitted to a professional journal should the topic be one of interest to the journal audience. 2. Formal presentation: A formal presentation is required for all research projects. This would include a PowerPoint presentation that you may be asked to present at a professional meeting. It should be comprehensive enough to accurately portray the entire experience, adhering to appropriate professional presentation guidelines. Grading Assessment: Grading will be based on the following rubric, taking into account the amount of active participation, work ethic, and attention to detail. Criteria 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Proposal submitted on time Proposal is complete Written Report Weekly posting in discussion area on time and helpful to others in the course Planned timeline was followed Problem or question is clearly stated Relevant literature is cited, if applicable Illustrations, examples, or references are relevant and sufficient The method supports the investigation’s purpose A reader could replicate the operations described Analytical techniques (if used) are sound Data are clearly represented Tables and figures are clear and accurate Data and information appear accurate and support conclusions Content is innovative or unique Essential points are adequately covered Writing is clear and unambiguous Language is appropriate Manuscript is well organized and flows well Length is appropriate Content builds or advances body of knowledge of health informatics References are current and appropriate APA format is followed Presentation Slide presentation covers all major points of the paper Font is appropriate size for presentation Slide design is professional in appearance Score 0=None 1=Minimal 2=Moderate 3=Significant

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Postinga 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100