HEALTH ORGANIZATIONAL EVALUATION GCU NRS 451

HEALTH ORGANIZATIONAL EVALUATION GCU NRS 451

HEALTH ORGANIZATIONAL EVALUATION GCU NRS 451

Assessment Description

Research a health care organization or network that spans several states with in the United States (United Healthcare, Vanguard, Banner Health, etc.). Assess the readiness of the health care organization or network you chose in regard to meeting the health care needs of citizens in the next decade.

Prepare a 1,000-1,250 word paper that presents your assessment and proposes a strategic plan to ensure readiness. Include the following:

  1. Describe the health care organization or network.
  2. Describe the organization’s overall readiness based on your findings.
  3. Prepare a strategic plan to address issues pertaining to network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction.
  4. Identify any current or potential issues within the organizational culture and discuss how these issues may affect aspects of the strategic plan.
  5. Propose a theory or model that could be used to support implementation of the strategic plan for this organization. Explain why this theory or model is best.

ou are required to cite a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be appropriate for the assignment and relevant to nursing practice.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: HEALTH ORGANIZATIONAL EVALUATION GCU NRS 451

HEALTH ORGANIZATIONAL EVALUATION GCU NRS 451
HEALTH ORGANIZATIONAL EVALUATION GCU NRS 451

Topic 1 DQ 3

Jun 13-19, 2022

Review your state’s mandated reporter statute. Provide details about this in your post. If faced with a mandated reporter issue, what are the steps in reporting the issue? Create a mandated reporter scenario and post it. Respond to one of your peer’s scenarios using the guidelines for submission/reporting in your state. Be sure to include a reference to your state’s website related to mandated reporting.

Ashley Fitzpatrick

Jun 20, 2022, 10:46 PM

In the state of Arizona, as defined by ARS 13-3620, it is required that “any person who reasonably believes that a minor is or has been the victim of physical injury, abuse, child abuse” (Arizona Department of Child Safety, n.d.) is to report any concerns of child abuse or neglect.

To make a report, call the DCS Statewide Child Abuse Hotline, or the law enforcement office. When reporting, it is important to know the following information, if possible, as it will be requested.

  • name, age, and gender of child and other family members
  • address, phone numbers, and/or directions to child’s home
  • parents’ place of employment
  • description of suspected abuse or neglect
  • current condition of the child.

Once the report has been made, a member of the Department of Child Safety will be assigned to the case and will conduct interviews with and other children who may be in the home, and any other people who may be part of the child’s life such as family, parents, neighbors, teachers, doctors and friends. (Arizona Department of Child Safety, n.d.)

 

Scenario: A nurse is working in the Emergency Department and a pediatric patient who is 12 years old comes in with their parents and the child has a broken arm. During the time that the nurse is asking the child questions of their history and what had happened, the child seems timid and is looking down without answering any questions. The child often looks to their parents to make sure it is okay to speak but is denied the opportunity to speak and the parents answer questions for the child. The nurse is suspecting that there may be child abuse occurring in the home but continues with her assessment. The nurse notices random bruising on the child’s arms, legs, and abdomen as she is completing her assessment. The parents are quick to come up with reasons for each and every bruise. At this point, the nurse believes that this child is being abused and decides to report this to the state.

 

HEALTH ORGANIZATIONAL EVALUATION GCU NRS 451  Reference:

Arizona Department of Child Safety. (n.d.). Report Child Abuse or Neglect https://dcs.az.gov/report-child-abuse#:

Anisa Rink

Jun 20, 2022, 12:22 AM

Here in Arizona, it is required by law to report abuse, physical injury, or neglect of a minor to the appropriate authorities. Reports can be made to the statewide child abuse hotline, or local law enforcement office. Mandated reporters include nurses, teachers, and anyone who has responsibility for children. Everyone is required to report reasonable belief of child abuse to a peace officer or to the Department of Child Safety if it is a non-emergent concern. However, if the report involves an individual who is not involved in the care or custody of the minor, then the report can only be made to a peace officer (Arizona Department of Child Safety, n.d.).

A scenario in which mandated reporting is necessary would be if a nurse noticed signs or physical injuries on a minor patient without a reasonable explanation (or suspected non-accidental). Examples would include fractures, internal bleeding, malnutrition, pressure sores, burns, or bruising. The nurse would be required to immediately report their suspicions and findings by telephone or electronically.

HEALTH ORGANIZATIONAL EVALUATION GCU NRS 451 References

Arizona Department of Child Safety (n.d.). Report child abuse or neglect. https://dcs.az.gov/report-child-abuse#:~:text=Mandated%20reporters%20are%20required%20by,authorized%20by%20ARS%2013%2D3620

Arizona Department of Child Safety (n.d.). Mandated reporter overview training. https://dcs.az.gov/sites/default/files/documents/files/Mandated_Reporter_Overview_Presentation_2020.pdf

https://www.azleg.gov/ars/13/03620.htm

HEALTH ORGANIZATIONAL EVALUATION GCU NRS 451 Rubric Criteria

Total 180 points

Criterion 1. Unsatisfactory 2. Less Than Satisfactory 3. Satisfactory 4. Good 5. Excellent
Documentation of Sources

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

0 points

Sources are not documented.

3.51 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

4.05 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

4.59 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

5.4 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

5.85 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

6.75 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

7.65 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

9 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Assessment of Overall Organizational Readiness

Assessment of Overall Organizational Readiness

0 points

Assessment of overall organizational readiness is omitted.

17.55 points

Assessment of overall organizational readiness is partially presented. There are significant omissions. Degree of organizational readiness is not established.

20.25 points

Assessment of overall organizational readiness is summarized. Degree of organizational readiness is partially established. More information, rationale, and support are needed.

22.95 points

Assessment of overall organizational readiness is described. Degree of organizational readiness is generally established. Some evidence or rationale is needed for support.

27 points

Assessment of overall organizational readiness is described in detail. Degree of organizational readiness is established. Strong evidence and rationale support the assessment.

Theory or Model to Support Implementation of Strategic Plan

Theory or Model to Support Implementation of Strategic Plan

0 points

Theory or model to support strategic plan implementation is omitted.

17.55 points

Theory or model to support strategic plan implementation is partially described. It is unclear how the theory or model would support implementation of strategic plan for the organization.

20.25 points

Theory or model to support strategic plan implementation is proposed. The theory or model demonstrates some support for implementation of the strategic plan for the organization. It is unclear why this theory or model is the best choice. More information is needed.

22.95 points

Theory or model to support strategic plan implementation is proposed. The theory or model demonstrates support for implementation of the strategic plan for the organization. General rationale is provided for why the theory or model is the best choice.

27 points

Theory or model to support strategic plan implementation is proposed. The theory or model demonstrates strong support for implementation of the strategic plan for the organization. Compelling rationale supports why the theory or model is the best choice.

Argument Logic and Construction

Argument Logic and Construction

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

5.85 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

6.75 points

Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

7.65 points

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

9 points

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Identification of Issues in Organizational Culture

Identification of Current or Potential Issues in Organizational Culture and Impact of These to Strategic Plan

0 points

Current or potential issues in the organizational culture and the impact of these to strategic plan are omitted.

17.55 points

Current or potential issues in the organizational culture are partially summarized. The potential impact of these on the strategic plan is unclear. There are omissions and inaccuracies throughout.

20.25 points

Current or potential issues in the organizational culture are generally discussed. The impact of these on the strategic plan is summarized. Evidence and rationale are needed to support claims.

22.95 points

Current or potential issues in the organizational culture and the potential impact of these on the strategic plan are discussed. Some evidence or rationale is needed.

27 points

Current or potential issues in the organizational culture are clearly identified. The potential impact of these on the strategic plan is thoroughly described and supported with evidence and rationale.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Thesis Development and Purpose

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

5.85 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

6.75 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

7.65 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

9 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Health Care Organization or Network

Health Care Organization or Network

0 points

Health care organization or network is not described.

17.55 points

Health care organization or network is partially presented. There are significant omissions and inaccuracies.

20.25 points

Health care organization or network is summarized. Some information is needed. There are minor inaccuracies related to the representation of the organization or network.

22.95 points

Health care organization or network is described. Some detail is needed for clarity.

27 points

Health care organization or network is clearly and accurately described.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

0 points

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

2.34 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

2.7 points

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

3.06 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3.6 points

All format elements are correct.

Strategic Plan

Strategic Plan

0 points

Strategic plan is omitted.

23.4 points

Strategic plan is partially presented. Plan contains major omissions. The plan fails to address issues outlined in the assignment criteria.

27 points

The strategic plan generally addresses network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction. More information, rationale, and support are needed.

30.6 points

The strategic plan addresses network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction. Some evidence or rationale is needed for support.

36 points

The strategic plan is well developed. Network growth, nurse staffing, resource management, and patient satisfaction are addressed in detail. The plan is supported with strong evidence and rationale.