Health & Medical Coronary Artery Disease Research Paper

Description

Write a research paper Based on what describe below:

Coronary Artery disease

1- introduction about the disease

2-Coronary Artery circulation

3- Coronary Artery Pathophysiology

4-Treatment

Coronary Artery disease 1. Introduction a. Statistics and fact of coronary artery disease b. Coronary circulation ( Rehman S, Khan A, 2020) 2. Coronary Artery disease: Pathophysiology a. Atherosclerosis (Libby P, and Theroux. 2005.) b. Risk factors i. High and low LDL cholesterol ii. High blood pressure iii. Diabetes iv. Smoking v. Age vi. Obesity 3. Treatment (Mayo Clinic: Coronary artery disease) a. Lifestyle Changes i. Eat healthy foods, exercise regularly and Quit smoking ii. Control weight, blood pressure and cholesterol iii. Keep diabetes under control and reduce stress b. Drugs Treatment i. Beta blockers ii. Calcium channel blockers iii. Ranolazine iv. Nitrates v. Nitroglycerin vi. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors Bibliography 1. Boudonas G. E. (2010). β-Blockers in coronary artery disease management. Hippokratia, 14(4), 231–235. Collet, C., Capodanno, D., Onuma, Y. et al. Left main coronary artery disease: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Nat Rev Cardiol 15, 321–331 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-018-0001-4 2. Price JF, MowbrayPI, Lee AJ, Rumley A, Lowe G, and Fowkes FG. Relationship Between Smoking and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in the Development of Peripheral Arterial Disease and Coronary Artery Disease; Edinburgh Artery Study. European Heart Journal, 1999/20,5/P 344–353, https://doi.org/10.1053/euhj.1998.1194 3. Libby P, and Theroux. Pathophysiology of Coronary Artery Disease. Circulation. 2005;111:3481– 3488, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.537878 4. Judy WM. and Cheng. Ranolazine for the management of coronary artery disease, Clinical Therapeutics, 2006, 0149-2918, P: 1996-2007. Doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.12.009. 5. Jespersen L, Hvelplund A, Steen A, Frants P, Galatius S, Jan K. Madsen, Jørgensen E, Kelbæk H, and Eva P. Stable Angina Pectoris with no Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease is associated with increased risks of major adverse cardiovascular events. European Heart Journal, 2012, 33, P734– 744, doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehr331 6. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE. Coronary Heart Disease: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/coronary-heartdisease#:~:text=Causes,the%20surface%20of%20the%20heart 7. Weightman, M. MBChB, Gibbs, M. MBBS, FANZCA, MD; Sheminant, RN, Eric G, Mahon, Barry D, and et al. Drug Therapy Before Coronary Artery Surgery: Nitrates Are Independent Predictors of Mortality and beta-Adrenergic Blockers Predict Survival. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 1999,88, 2. P: 286-291 doi: 10.1213/00000539-199902000-00011 8. Rehman S, Khan A, Rehman A. Physiology, Coronary Circulation.. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482413/ 9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2020. Heart Disease Facts. https://www.cdc.gov/heartdisease/facts.htm.

Grid View

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Main Posting	45 (45%) – 50 (50%) Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.	40 (40%) – 44 (44%) Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.	35 (35%) – 39 (39%) Responds to some of the discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors.	0 (0%) – 34 (34%) Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Post: Timeliness	10 (10%) – 10 (10%) Posts main post by day 3.	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not post by day 3.
First Response	17 (17%) – 18 (18%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	15 (15%) – 16 (16%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	13 (13%) – 14 (14%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.	0 (0%) – 12 (12%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited.
Second Response	16 (16%) – 17 (17%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	12 (12%) – 13 (13%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.	0 (0%) – 11 (11%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited.
Participation	5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
Total Points: 100