Health Communications PHC312

Health Communications PHC312

Sample Answer for Health Communications PHC312 Included After Question

Health Communications PHC312

PHC 312 Group Assignment Paper College of Health Sciences

ASSIGNMENT COVER SHEET Course name: Health Communications Course code: PHC312 CRN: 24567 Assignment title or task: Students enrolled in PHC 312 in winter 2022 will be divided into groups (5-7 students per group). The first section will be designed to gain general information about the communication program. The second section will be designed to assess the student’s ability to draft a health communication plan. The group has 5 points to cover under the general program information section. The main communication program characteristics section will be designed to assess the group’s ability to provide basic information about the health communication planning process. The written health communication program plan must be completed and submitted to the instructor no later than 11:59 PM on (February 04, 2023). General program information 1. Name of the program. 2. Country and region (if applicable) where the program is based. 3. Time period (start and end dates). 4. Funding sources. 5. Give a short description of the program (maximum of about 250 words). Main communication program characteristics 1. Describe the overall goal of the program. 2. List the SMART objectives of the program. 3. Describe the target audience(s) of the program (primary and secondary audiences). ✔ Indicate the demographic and socioeconomic factors of the target population that have been measured. E.g. age, gender, income/socioeconomic status, education, occupation…etc. 4. Literature review: basing the communication program on current scientific knowledge and/or theoretical models and/or previous experience from other projects? One or two paragraphs about the problem. (300-500 words). 5. Describe the settings and communication channels. 6. Describe the development process of messages. 7. Describe the activities and timeline. 8. Describe the process/impact/outcome evaluation of the communication program that will be measured. Points that can be added as a bonus (NOT REQUIRED): PHC 312 Group Assignment Paper ● Describe the needs assessment that has been carried out. ● Describe the environmental factors (i.e. factors beyond individual control) that the communication program addresses, if any. ● Does the communication plan have a special focus on vulnerable groups (socioeconomically disadvantaged people, ethnic minorities, children, elderly people, etc.)? if yes, specify the vulnerable groups. ● Provide details of the pilot study if a pilot study has been performed. ● Describe which stakeholders are going to be involved in the implementation and describe their roles. Group Number: Student name & ID # Submission date: Instructor name: Ahmed Al Rasasi Grade: …. Out of 10 The written report will be assessed for clarity and succinctness in providing the required information using a rubric of 0 (undeveloped/inadequate) to 3 (outstanding/exceptional), as illustrated below: Inadequat e Objective/Element Report clearly and succinctly defines program goals 2. Report clearly and succinctly defines program SMART objectives. 3. SMART objectives are: a. Specific: objectives should clearly specify what is to be achieved. b. Measurable: objectives should be phrased in a way that achievement can be measured. c. Achievable: objectives should refer to something that the program can actually influence and change. d. Realistic: objectives should be realistically attainable within the given time frame and with the available resources (human and financial Proficient Outstandin Partially Meets Exceeds Fails to meets expectatio Expectation meet expectations ns 3 expectatio 1 2 ns 0 1. Adequate PHC 312 Group Assignment Paper e. 4. resources and capacity). Time-bound: objectives should relate to a clearly stated time frame. Report clearly and succinctly describes the target audiences (primary & secondary audiences). ✔Indicate the demographic and socioeconomic factors of the target population that have been measured. E.g. age, gender, income/socioeconomic status, education, occupation…etc. 5. Report provides a brief background that includes: ✔ Literature review. 6. Report clearly and succinctly describes settings and communication channels 7. Report clearly and succinctly describes the development process of messages. 8. Report clearly and succinctly describes the activities and timeline. 9. Report clearly and succinctly describes how the process/impact/outcome evaluation of the communication program will be measured. Total This assignment is worth 10% of the total possible points earned for the course. Guidelines: ● Use this Word Document. ● Fill in students’ information on the first page of this document. ● Font should be 12 Times New Roman ● Headings should be Bold ● Color should be Black ● Line spacing should be 1.5 ● Use reliable references (APA format) ● AVOID PLAGIARISM (you will get ZERO when there is plagiarism) ● You should use at least 2 references ● Submit this WORD Document when you complete the required task ● Submission should be before the deadline (submission after the deadline is not allowed)

Health Communications PHC312
Health Communications PHC312

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:Health Communications PHC312

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Postinga 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: Health Communications PHC312

Title: Health Communications PHC312