Health and environmental risk

College of Health Sciences Department of Public Health PAPER ASSIGNMENT Course name: Health and environmental risk Course number: PHC-351 Question 1: Describe the Precautionary Principle and Approaches for Its Application in Public Health Decision Making Question 2: write short notes about Limitations-use in public health decision making Question 3: Define What Risk Communication Is and How It Fits in the Risk Assessment and Risk Management Decision-Making Process. Question 4: Describe the Regulatory Context for Risk Communication. Questions Question 5: Recognize How Risk Perception Affects a Lay Person’s Assessment of a Risk ***Instructions • Attempt all the questions, each question carries 2 marks. • Do not write direct answers, solve it in step wise manner describing the formulas. • No late work will be accepted, and no second chance will be given. • Mention your name & ID, instructor’s name, and the date of submission before uploading the file to BB. Student Name: Student ID: CRN 23627 Branch Undetermined Submission Date: Instructor name Total Dr. Mustafa Mohammed Grade /10 Due Date: 10.2/2023 (End of the day) Page 1 of 2 College of Health Sciences Department of Public Health • • • • • • Plagiarism policy: no plagiarism is accepted in the assignments at all. The student should write the assignment in their own words. Two identical assignments will be rejected with zero grades. Citation: The students are required to use APA style of citation in their assignments. The assignment should have the COVER PAGE with New SEU logo and the details of who is submitting and to whom is it submitted. Naming the assignment file: student should use the following format for naming and uploading their assignment: Student name (Student ID) PHC273_Assignment name Assignments with improper names and formats will be rejected. Assignments should only be submitted through Blackboard only and not through email. If there is any technical issue in the BB, then it should be reported to BB support team. The screenshot of the problem and the assignment then can be sent to the instructor. The submission of assignment must be done before the scheduled deadline. o Late assignments can be accepted only if the student informed the instructor before the assignment deadline is overdue of any acceptable reason of delay. Write your answers below this point. Page 2 of 2

Grid View

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Main Posting	45 (45%) – 50 (50%) Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.	40 (40%) – 44 (44%) Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.	35 (35%) – 39 (39%) Responds to some of the discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors.	0 (0%) – 34 (34%) Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Post: Timeliness	10 (10%) – 10 (10%) Posts main post by day 3.	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not post by day 3.
First Response	17 (17%) – 18 (18%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	15 (15%) – 16 (16%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	13 (13%) – 14 (14%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.	0 (0%) – 12 (12%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited.
Second Response	16 (16%) – 17 (17%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	12 (12%) – 13 (13%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.	0 (0%) – 11 (11%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited.
Participation	5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
Total Points: 100