HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development

Sample Answer for HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development Included After Question

Description

Financing healthcare is one of the greatest priorities for the healthcare system in Saudi Arabia. While policymakers agree that more Saudi nationals need health insurance coverage, the debate often revolves around how it should be financed. Identify a healthcare professional who works primarily in the area of finance (e.g., Chief Financial Officer, Controller, etc.) and a specific policy that addresses the financial aspect of delivering healthcare. Contact the individual to conduct an interview about the policy.

Based on what you learned this week, be sure to include the following information in your interview:

Identify the interviewee, including their job title, place of employment, location, and how long they have been in the area of finance.

The goals and objectives of your interview.

Description of the finance policy.
What were some of the benefits of the policy?
What are the challenges of meeting the requirements outlined in the policy?
What can be done to improve the effectiveness of the policy?
Here are some suggested questions:
What are the mission and vision statements for your organization?
HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development

How do these mission and vision statements assist in helping your organization focus on healthy living promotions?

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development

How are the daily operations for your organization meeting policy? What are some of the areas that may lead to improvement regarding any policy updates?

What are some of the challenges that you are currently experiencing with your policy revisions?
What are some of the benefits your policy is providing to patients or clients?
What are some of the recommendations that you may have regarding policy improvement both internally and externally?

Module 10 HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development Instructor Name Module Learning Outcomes 1. Evaluate Saudi public health policies associated with the financing and delivery of health services. 2. Investigate determinants of health can shape priorities of healthcare agendas. HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development Pre-diabetes and Diabetes in Saudi Arabia HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development Reason to Study Diabetic Risk ●Education ●Weight/BMI ●Marital status ●Age HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development KSA Study Results HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development Policy Implications ●Need for guidelines and strategies ●Diabetes is a health concern ●Comes with physical and financial concerns ●Primary health care can educate patients before Diabetes occurs ●Risk factors HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development Elder Health in Saudi Arabia HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development Challenges of Caring for Elderly ●Lack of human capital ●Poor understanding of needs ●Overwhelmed institutions ●Unique health needs HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development Studying a Population ●Understand specific demographics ●Need for evidence-based national policies ●Public intervention programs HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development National Survey for Elderly Health (SNSEH) ●Looks at those >60 ●To guide national healthcare policy ●Focused on ○Common health problems ○Available health services ○Health service utilization HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development Results of SNSEH ●Most Saudi citizens are still young ●Can use this data as intervention for the future ●Preventing disability and disease ●Active engagement increases cognitive ability HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development National Strategies for Aging ●“Care for Older Adults” Program ●National programs guided by data ●Ministry of Health creating age-friendly primary health centers ●Home care programs HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development Regulation of Medical Devices HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA) ●Verification review ●Chemistry and manufacturing ●Nonclinical data ●Clinical data HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development SFDA Continued ●The review process takes about 420 calendar days ●Six measures ○Standard operating procedures ○Quality assurance department ○Use of scientific committees ○Good review practice system ○Shared and joint reviews ○Assessment templates HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development Medical Device Summary HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development Conclusion HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development Module 9 Critical Thinking Requirements ● Identify someone in the healthcare field who may have created a policy or assessment to improve healthy living. Contact that individual to conduct an interview about the policy. . HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development Questions Take advantage of this opportunity to seek further clarification. HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development Next Live Session ● ● HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development References ● Aldossari, K. K., Aldiab, A., Al-Zahrani, J. M., Al-Ghamdi, S. H., Abdelrazik, M., Batais, M. A., … & El-Metwally, A. (2018). Prevalence of prediabetes, diabetes, and its associated risk factors among males in Saudi Arabia: A population-based survey. Journal of Diabetes Research, 2018. Retrieved from https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jdr/2018/2194604/ ● Khoja, A. T., Aljawadi, M. H., Al-Shammari, S. A., Mohamed, A. G., AlManaa, H. A., Morlock, L., … & Khoja, T. A. (2018). The health of Saudi older adults; results from the Saudi National Survey for Elderly Health (SNSEH) 2006–2015. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 26(2), 292-300. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319016417302037 ● Mashaki Ceyhan, E., Gürsöz, H., Alkan, A., Coşkun, H., Koyuncu, O., & Walker, S. (2018). The Turkish medicines and medical devices agency: Comparison of its registration process with Australia, Canada, Saudi Arabia, and Singapore. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 9, 9. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5789679/5 HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development This concludes our live session. Thank you for your attendance!

As we begin this session, I would like to take this opportunity to clarify my expectations for this course:

Please note that GCU Online weeks run from Thursday (Day 1) through Wednesday (Day 7).

Course Room Etiquette:

It is my expectation that all learners will respect the thoughts and ideas presented in the discussions.
All postings should be presented in a respectful, professional manner. Remember – different points of view add richness and depth to the course!

Office Hours:

My office hours vary so feel free to shoot me an email at Kelly.[email protected] or my office phone is 602.639.6517 and I will get back to you within one business day or as soon as possible.
Phone appointments can be scheduled as well. Send me an email and the best time to call you, along with your phone number to make an appointment.
I welcome all inquiries and questions as we spend this term together. My preference is that everyone utilizes the Questions to Instructor forum. In the event your question is of a personal nature, please feel free to post in the Individual Questions for Instructor forum I will respond to all posts or emails within 24 or sooner.

Late Policy and Grading Policy

Discussion questions:

I do not mark off for late DQ’s.
I would rather you take the time to read the materials and respond to the DQ’s in a scholarly way, demonstrating your understanding of the materials.
I will not accept any DQ submissions after day 7, 11:59 PM (AZ Time) of the week.
Individual written assignments – due by 11:59 PM AZ Time Zone on the due dates indicated for each class deliverable.

Assignments:

Assignments turned in after their specified due dates are subject to a late penalty of -10%, each day late, of the available credit. Please refer to the student academic handbook and GCU policy.
Any activity or assignment submitted after the due date will be subject to GCU’s late policy
Extenuating circumstances may justify exceptions, which are at my sole discretion. If an extenuating circumstance should arise, please contact me privately as soon as possible.
No assignments can be accepted for grading after midnight on the final day of class.
All assignments will be graded in accordance with the Assignment Grading Rubrics

Participation

Participation in each week’s Discussion Board forum accounts for a large percentage of your final grade in this course.
Please review the Course Syllabus for a comprehensive overview of course deliverables and the value associated with each.
It is my expectation that each of you will substantially contribute to the course discussion forums and respond to the posts of at least three other learners.
A substantive post should be at least 200 words. Responses such as “great posts” or “I agree” do not meet the active engagement expectation.
Please feel free to draw on personal examples as you develop your responses to the Discussion Questions but you do need to demonstrate your understanding of the materials.
I do expect outside sources as well as class materials to formulate your post.
APA format is not necessary for DQ responses, but I do expect a proper citation for references.
Please use peer-related journals found through the GCU library and/or class materials to formulate your answers. Do not try to “Google” DQ’s as I am looking for class materials and examples from the weekly materials.
I will not accept responses that are from Wikipedia, Business dictionary.com, or other popular business websites. You will not receive credit for generic web searches – this does not demonstrate graduate-level research.
Stay away from the use of personal pronouns when writing. As a graduate student, you are expected to write based on research and gathering of facts. Demonstrating your understanding of the materials is what you will be graded on. You will be marked down for lack of evidence to support your ideas.

Plagiarism

Plagiarism is the act of claiming credit for another’s work, accomplishments, or ideas without appropriate acknowledgment of the source of the information by including in-text citations and references.
This course requires the utilization of APA format for all course deliverables as noted in the course syllabus.
Whether this happens deliberately or inadvertently, whenever plagiarism has occurred, you have committed a Code of Conduct violation.
Please review your LopesWrite report prior to final submission.
Every act of plagiarism, no matter the severity, must be reported to the GCU administration (this includes your DQ’s, posts to your peers, and your papers).

Plagiarism includes:

Representing the ideas, expressions, or materials of another without due credit.
Paraphrasing or condensing ideas from another person’s work without proper citation and referencing.
Failing to document direct quotations without proper citation and referencing.
Depending upon the amount, severity, and frequency of the plagiarism that is committed, students may receive in-class penalties that range from coaching (for a minor omission), -20% grade penalties for resubmission, or zero credit for a specific assignment. University-level penalties may also occur, including suspension or even expulsion from the University.
If you are at all uncertain about what constitutes plagiarism, you should review the resources available in the Student Success Center. Also, please review the University’s policies about plagiarism which are covered in more detail in the GCU Catalog and the Student Handbook.
We will be utilizing the GCU APA Style Guide 7th edition located in the Student Success Center > The Writing Center for all course deliverables.

LopesWrite

All course assignments must be uploaded to the specific Module Assignment Drop Box, and also submitted to LopesWrite every week.
Please ensure that your assignment is uploaded to both locations under the Assignments DropBox. Detailed instructions for using LopesWrite are located in the Student Success Center.

Assignment Submissions

Please note that Microsoft Office is the software requirement at GCU.
I can open Word files or any file that is saved with a .rtf (Rich Text Format) extension. I am unable to open .wps files.
If you are using a “.wps” word processor, please save your files using the .rtf extension that is available from the drop-down box before uploading your files to the Assignment Drop Box.

Grade of Incomplete

The final grade of Incomplete is granted at the discretion of the instructor; however, students must meet certain specific criteria before this grade accommodation is even possible to consider.
The grade of Incomplete is reserved for times when students experience a serious extenuating circumstance or a crisis during the last week of class which prevents the completion of course requirements before the close of the grading period. Students also must pass the course at the time the request is made.
Please contact me personally if you are having difficulties in meeting course requirements or class deadlines during our time together. In addition, if you are experiencing personal challenges or difficulties, it is best to contact the Academic Counselor so that you can discuss the options that might be available to you, as well as each option’s academic and financial repercussions.

Grade Disputes

If you have any questions about a grade you have earned on an individual assignment or activity, please get in touch with me personally for further clarification.
While I have made every attempt to grade you fairly, on occasion a misunderstanding may occur, so please allow me the opportunity to learn your perspective if you believe this has occurred. Together, we should be able to resolve grading issues on individual assignments.
However, after we have discussed individual assignments’ point scores, if you still believe that the final grade you have earned at the end of the course is not commensurate with the quality of work you produced for this class, there is a formal Grade Grievance procedure which is outlined in the GCU Catalog and Student Handbook.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development

Title: HCM550 Healthcare Policy Analysis and Development

Grid View

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Main Postinga	45 (45%) – 50 (50%) Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.	40 (40%) – 44 (44%) Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.	35 (35%) – 39 (39%) Responds to some of the discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors.	0 (0%) – 34 (34%) Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Post: Timeliness	10 (10%) – 10 (10%) Posts main post by day 3.	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not post by day 3.
First Response	17 (17%) – 18 (18%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	15 (15%) – 16 (16%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	13 (13%) – 14 (14%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.	0 (0%) – 12 (12%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited.
Second Response	16 (16%) – 17 (17%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	12 (12%) – 13 (13%) Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.	0 (0%) – 11 (11%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited.
Participation	5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
Total Points: 100