HCM 520 Healthcare Errors Discussion

HCM520: WEEK 6 Paper & Discussion

Week 6 Paper: Patient Safety and Outcomes: Healthcare Errors

Healthcare Error Prevention (Paper)

Use the CSU Global Library, along with appropriate internet sources, to identify three real-world examples of healthcare errors that impacted patient safety within the past five years.
Use the readings and your knowledge of risk management and quality/performance improvement to analyze these errors and to prepare a paper designed to inform a healthcare organization on how to prevent these situations or events from occurring. Your paper must include:

A concise summary of each healthcare error event.

An analysis of the impact each event had on internal and external stakeholders.

Recommendations to the healthcare organization for quality and performance improvements to prevent this situation or event from occurring.

Submission Requirements:

Your paper should meet the following requirements:

4-5 pages in length (not including cover page & reference page).

Robust      Introduction:

Open       with a robust one-paragraph introduction that provides a brief (3-5       sentences), formal overview of the specific purpose, approach and scope       of the paper – provide precise thesis/problem statement. Preview the       specific topics, issues, and recommendations that the paper explores.

Include at least FOUR scholarly      references from peer-reviewed articles beyond the text or other course      materials. (Not more than 5 years old). Two of these sources may be from      the class readings, textbook, or lectures, but two must be external.

Be sure to discuss and reference      concepts taken from the assigned textbook reading and relevant research.

Week 6: Discussion Post ~ 300-500 words.

The U.S. healthcare system must continue to focus on patient safety and outcomes. High Reliability Organizations (HROs) especially must be aware of potential risks that could have a major impact on their health system.

Research online material related to high-reliability organizations.

Briefly explain what it is and how it may impact patient outcomes.

• Next, research a current healthcare HRO
• What       has the organization done to be identified as an HRO
• How       could this HRO practices be emulated within the healthcare industry?
• • Participation: RN-to-BSNIn discussions, you, as a student, will interact with your instructor and classmates to explore topics related to the content of this course. You will be graded for the following.
    1. Attendance

    Discussions (graded): Discussions are a critical learning experience in the online classroom. Participation in all discussions is required.

    2. Guidelines and Rubric for Discussions

    PURPOSE: Threaded discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In the discussions students:

    • Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week
    • Integrate scholarly resources
    • Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates
    • Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

    Participation Requirement: You are required to post a minimum of three (3) times in each graded discussion. These three (3) posts must be on a minimum of two (2) separate days. You must respond to the initial discussion question by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday.

    Participation points: It is expected that you will meet the minimum participation requirement described above. If not:

    • You will receive a 10% point deduction in a thread if your response to the initial question is not posted by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday
    • You will also receive a 10% point deduction in a thread if you do not post at least three (3) times in each thread on at least two (2) separate days.
    3. Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles

    The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

    4. Participation Guidelines

    You are required to post a minimum of three (3) times in each graded discussion. These three (3) posts must be on a minimum of two (2) separate days. You must respond to the initial discussion question by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday. Discussions for each week close on Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Mountain Time (MT). To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. For courses with Week 8 graded discussions, the threads will close on Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT. All discussion requirements must be met by that deadline

    5. Grading Rubric

    6. Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:HCM 520 Healthcare Errors Discussion

       

       HCM 520 Healthcare Errors Discussion

  • Discussion Criteria	A (100%) Outstanding or highest level of performance	B (87%) Very good or high level of performance	C (76%) Competent or satisfactory level of performance	F (0) Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performance
    Answers the initial graded threaded discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of concepts for the week. 16 points	Addresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding regarding all weekly concepts. 16 points	Addresses most aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of most of the weekly concepts. 14 points	Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of some of the weekly concepts. 12 points	Minimally addresses the initial discussion question(s) or does not address the initial question(s). 0 points
    Integrates evidence to support discussion. Sources are credited.* ( APA format not required) 12 points	Integrates evidence to support your discussion from: assigned readings** OR online lessons, AND at least one outside scholarly source.*** Sources are credited.* 12 points	Integrates evidence to support discussion from: assigned readings OR online lesson. Sources are credited.* 10 points	Integrates evidence to support discussion only from an outside source with no mention of assigned reading or lesson. Sources are credited.* 9 points	Does not integrate any evidence. 0 points
    Engages in meaningful dialogue with classmates or instructor before the end of the week. 14 points	Responds to a classmate and/or instructor’s post furthering the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion. 14 points	Responds to a classmate and/or instructor furthering the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion. 12 points	Responds to a classmate and/or instructor but does not further the discussion. 10 points	No response post to another student or instructor. 0 points
    Communicates in a professional manner. 8 points	Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). 8 points	Presents information in an organized manner (few errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). 7 points	Presents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation). 6 points	Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation). 0 points
    PARTICIPATION: Response to initial question: Responds to initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. M.T.	0 points lost Student posts an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p . m. MT.		-5 points Student does not post an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p . m. MT.
    PARTICIPATION Total posts: Participates in the discussion thread at least three times on at least two different days.	0 points lost Posts in the discussion at least three times AND on two different days.		-5 points Posts fewer than three times OR does not participate on at least two different days.
    NOTES: * Credited means stating where the information came from (specific article, text, or lesson). Examples: Our text discusses…. The information from our lesson states…, Smith (2010) claimed that…, Mary Manners (personal communication, November 17, 2011)…. APA formatting is not required.
    ** Assigned readings are those listed on the syllabus or assignments page as required reading. This may include text readings, required articles, or required websites.
    *** Scholarly source – per the APA Guidelines in Course Resources, only scholarly sources should be used in assignments. These include peer reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Wikipedia, Wikis, .com website or blogs should not be used as anyone can add to these. For the discussions, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. Outside sources do not include assigned required readings.
    NOTE: A zero is the lowest score that a student can be assign  Read also: CSI Sustainable Development Goals Activity Assignment