HCM 403 Module 4 Assignment 2 Quality Assurance Implementation Concerns

HCM 403 Module 4 Assignment 2 Quality Assurance Implementation Concerns

HCM 403 Module 4 Assignment 2 Quality Assurance Implementation Concerns

Your management staff needs a better understanding of factors that would inhibit implementation of a Quality Assurance program at their hospital. 

Identify and describe at least 10 factors that could inhibit implementation of a quality assurance (QA) program at the hospital. 

Identify the characteristics, defense mechanisms, and behaviors that the hospital may observe when implementing a new QA process. 

Provide at least three suggestions of how the hospital can minimize the resistance to change in their organization. 

Write a two- to three-page executive summary of your findings to the management staff using APA formatting styles.

HCM 403 Module 4 Assignment 2 Quality Assurance Implementation Concerns
HCM 403 Module 4 Assignment 2 Quality Assurance Implementation Concerns

  • Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: HCM 403 Module 4 Assignment 2 Quality Assurance Implementation Concerns

    HCM 403 Module 4 Assignment 2 Quality Assurance Implementation Concerns  Grading Rubric

    Performance Category 100% or highest level of performance

    100%

    16 points

    		 Very good or high level of performance

    88%

    14 points

    		 Acceptable level of performance

    81%

    13 points

    		 Inadequate demonstration of expectations

    68%

    11 points

    		 Deficient level of performance

    56%

    9 points

     

    		 Failing level

    of performance

    55% or less

    0 points
     Total Points Possible= 50           16 Points    14 Points 13 Points        11 Points           9 Points          0 Points
    Scholarliness

    Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.

    		 Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

    • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
    • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
    • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
    • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
    		 Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

    • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
    • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
    • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
    • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
    		 Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

    • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
    • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
    • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
    • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
    		  

    Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

    • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
    • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
    • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
    • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
    		  

    Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

    • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
    • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
    • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
    • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
    		 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

    • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
    • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
    • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
    • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
     16 Points  14 Points  13 Points 11 Points 9 Points  0 Points
    Application of Course Knowledge

    Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

    		 Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

    • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
    • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
    • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
    		 Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

    • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
    • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
    • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
    		 Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

    • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
    • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
    • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
    		 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

    • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
    • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
    • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
    		 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

    • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
    • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
    • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
    		 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

    • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
    • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.
    • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
       10 Points 9 Points  6 Points  0 Points
    Interactive Dialogue

    Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)

    The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)

    Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.

    		 Demonstrated all of the following:

    • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
    • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
    • Responses are substantive
    • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
    		 Demonstrated 3 of the following:

    • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
    • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
    • Responses are substantive
    • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
    		 Demonstrated 2 of the following:

    • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
    • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
    • Responses are substantive
    • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
    		 Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

    • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
    • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
    • Responses are substantive
    • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
      8 Points 7 Points  6 Points         5 Points          4 Points  0 Points
    Grammar, Syntax, APA

    Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

    The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

    Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.

    		 The following was present:

    • 0-3 errors in APA format

    AND

    • Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

    AND

    • Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.
    		 The following was present:

    • 4-6 errors in APA format.

    AND/OR

    • Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

    AND/OR

    • Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.
    		 The following was present:

    • 7-9 errors in APA format.

    AND/OR

    • Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

    AND/OR

    • Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.
    		  

    The following was present:

    • 10- 12 errors in APA format

    AND/OR

    • Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors

    AND/OR

    • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.
    		  

    The following was present:

    • 13 – 15 errors in APA format

    AND/OR

    • Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors

    AND/OR

    • Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.

    AND/OR

    • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.
    		 The following was present:

    • 16 to greater errors in APA format.

    AND/OR

    • Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

    AND/OR

    • Writing style does not facilitate communication
      0 Points Deducted 5 Points Lost
    Participation

    Requirements

    		Demonstrated the following:

    • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
    		 Failed to demonstrate the following:

    • Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
      0 Points Lost 5 Points Lost
    Due Date Requirements Demonstrated all of the following:

    • The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

    A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.