HCM 101 Saudi Electronic University Varian Health Systems Paper

HCM 101 Saudi Electronic University Varian Health Systems Paper

HCM 101 Saudi Electronic University Varian Health Systems Paper

Chapter 5 STRATEGIC PLANNING Figure 5-1: Strategic Planning Process Strategic Planning Process • SWOT Analysis • Strategy Identification and Selection • Strategy Tactical Plans • Rollout and Implementation • Monitoring and Control • Feedback Situational Assessment • Market Assessment – Healthcare Workforce – Consumers and Payers – Innovations in Technology – Regulatory Environment – Competitive Rivalry – Market Volume Forecast Situational Assessment • Organizational Assessment – Organizational Volume Forecast – Financial Condition – Strategic Performance – Core Capabilities Situational Assessment •Mission •Vision •Values Figure 5-2: Market Assessment Model Strategy Identification and Selection • Scenario Exploration • Assumptions • Financial Targets • Resource Matching • Outcomes Strategy Tactical Plans • Implementation Steps • Timeframes • Results Rollout and Implementation • Board Approval/ Endorsement • Operating Plan • Marketing Plan • Facilities Plan • Capital Plan Monitoring and Control • Dashboard College of Health Sciences Department of Public Health HCM-ASSIGNMENT -Week 7 Course name: Health Care Management Course number: HCM 101 CRN 24682 • • Assignment title or task: • • • • Review Chapter 5 in Buchbinder & Shanks (2012). Examine the missions and visions of any health Organizations within Saudi Arabia. (The organization must have website) Using a Word document, write one page paper. Choose one health Organizations and identify three strategic priorities it exhibits. What market powers and trends will have an impact on these priorities? What would the role of the manager be in setting and implementing these strategies? Student name: Students Id Number: Submission date: Instructor name: Dr. Samiha Ramadan Grade: Out of 10 College of Health Sciences Department of Public Health Guidelines: • • • • • • • Your response should in one page paper and not exceed 300 words. Font should be 12 Times New Roman Heading should be Bold Color should be Black Line spacing should be 1.5 Use Assignment coversheet Use proper references in APA style

HCM 101 Saudi Electronic University Varian Health Systems Paper
HCM 101 Saudi Electronic University Varian Health Systems Paper

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:HCM 101 Saudi Electronic University Varian Health Systems Paper

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Postinga 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100