Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

HCI 670 Designing Electronic Forms

HCI 670 Designing Electronic Forms

The purpose of this assignment is to design a clinical form to be used for oncology RN navigators.

Read the \”Integrated Case Study\” resource and review the \”Oncology North: Navigator Intake Paper Form\” and \”Oncology South: Oncology Navigator Intake Form\” prior to beginning the assignment.

Based upon the case study and two intake forms, use an Excel spreadsheet or Word document to design a custom form that merges the paper documents and converts them to an electronic form. Be sure to include the different custom fields and topics necessary for navigating the form.

Along with your form, include a 250-word rationale in which you:

Describe the heuristic principles used to design the clinical form.
Explain how the documentation aids the oncology RN navigator in providing quality patient care.
Explain the rationale of the design.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: HCI 670 Designing Electronic Forms

A description of the heuristic principles used to design the document is not present.
A description of the heuristic principles used to design the document is incomplete or incorrect.
A description of the heuristic principles used to design the document is included but lacks supporting details.
A description of the heuristic principles used to design the document is complete and includes supporting details.
A description of the heuristic principles used to design the document is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Quality Patient Care

HCI 670 Designing Electronic Forms

An explanation of how the documentation aids the oncology RN navigator in providing quality patient care is not present.
An explanation of how the documentation aids the oncology RN navigator in providing quality patient care is incomplete or incorrect.
An explanation of how the documentation aids the oncology RN navigator in providing quality patient care is included but lacks supporting details.
An explanation of how the documentation aids the oncology RN navigator in providing quality patient care is complete and includes supporting details.
An explanation of how the documentation aids the oncology RN navigator in providing quality patient care is extremely thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
Criteria 4Design Rationale
10.0
A rationale of the design is not provided.
A weak rationale of the design is provided.
The rationale of the design is underdeveloped.
A clear rationale of the design is provided.
A substantial rationale of the design is provided.
Visual Appeal
10.0
There are few or no graphic elements. No variation in layout or typography is evident.
Color is garish and/or typographic variations are overused and legibility suffers. Background interferes with readability. Understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships is limited.
Minimal use of graphic elements is evident. Elements do not consistently contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. There is some variation in type size, color, and layout.
Thematic graphic elements are used but not always in context. Visual connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently.
Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships. Differences in type size or color are used well and consistently.
Technical Skill
10.0
Execution does not meet the criteria outlined.
Execution is sloppy and unprofessional.
Execution needs improvement.
Execution is of good quality.
Execution is flawless. Demonstrates an in-depth, high-level of understanding.
Originality
7.0
The work is an extensive collection and rehash of the ideas, products, images, or inventions of other people. There is no evidence of new thought or inventiveness.
The work is a minimal collection or rehash of the ideas, products, images, or inventions of other people. There is no evidence of new thought.
The product shows evidence of originality. While based on the ideas, products, images, or inventions of other people, the work does offer some new insights.
The product shows evidence of originality and inventiveness. While based somewhat on the ideas, products, images, or inventions of other people, the work extends beyond that collection to offer new insights.
The product shows significant evidence of originality and inventiveness. The majority of the content and many of the ideas are fresh, original, inventive, and based upon logical conclusions and sound research.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)
3.0
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Total Percentage 100

Also Read: HCI 670 What are the benefits of a workflow analysis?

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.