HCI-112: Electronic Health/Medical Rec
HCI-112 Electronic Health Medical Rec
mHealth during Covid-19 pandemic among users Introduction The mHealth goal is to enhance the public health, especially in the underserved populations, the health research, the training, and the education applications cvid-19 pandemic Why is mHealth Important? mHealth has elevated the accessibility to the healthcare services, offering the reach to the patients that once considered unreachable. What is mHealth and the common example of mHealth? mHealth is the general term for the utilization of mobile phones and the other popular application of mHealth is the utilization of the mobile devices to educate consumers about the preventive healthcare services. The Traditional Role of the mHealth in the Covid-19 Improving the healthy lifestyle and enhancing the awareness, the active participation and motivation of the individuals for the health care solutions and the technologies The Role of the mHealth in the Fight against the Covid-19 The main role is the traditional one performed in the field of digital health by connecting the citizens to the health system and offering them with the highly innovative technological solutions. The Role of the mHealth in the Fight against the Covid-19 • summarize scientific materials in the languages common to residents; To spread messages in a timely manner(mawed) . • adopt and develop applications: (tetaman) and up on evaluate suspected, cases and follow up on confirmed cases, (tapa’ad) • other applications such as: (sehaty) (Tawakulna) . • It has also activated the role of virtual clinics, telemedicine and remote medical consultations, the teleradiology platform, and medical robotics; To prevent the spread of the new Corona virus. Conclusion M health apps did not affect the people’s contentment for the public health administration, the apps indirectly elevated their satisfaction by meeting the user utilitarian requires and offering the functional (healthcare assurance), the emotional (psychological interventions) Thank you … References • Cao, J., Zhang, G., & Liu, D. (2022, March). The Impact of Using mHealth Apps on Improving Public Health Satisfaction during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Digital Content Value Chain Perspective. In Healthcare (Vol. 10, No. 3, p. 479). MDPI. • King, E., Kinvig, K., Steif, J., Qiu, A. Q., Maan, E. J., Albert, A. Y., … & Murray, M. C. M. (2017). Mobile text messaging to improve medication adherence and viral load in a vulnerable Canadian population living with human immunodeficiency virus: a repeated measures study. Journal of medical Internet research, 19(6). • Dale, L. P., Whittaker, R., Jiang, Y., Stewart, R., Rolleston, A., & Maddison, R. (2015). Text message and internet support for coronary heart disease self-management: results from the Text4Heart randomized controlled trial. Journal of medical Internet research, 17(10), e4944. mHealth during Covid-19 pandemic among users Introduction The mHealth goal is to enhance the public health, especially in the underserved populations, the health research, the training, and the education applications cvid-19 pandemic Why is mHealth Important? mHealth has elevated the accessibility to the healthcare services, offering the reach to the patients that once considered unreachable. What is mHealth and the common example of mHealth? mHealth is the general term for the utilization of mobile phones and the other popular application of mHealth is the utilization of the mobile devices to educate consumers about the preventive healthcare services. The Traditional Role of the mHealth in the Covid-19 Improving the healthy lifestyle and enhancing the awareness, the active participation and motivation of the individuals for the health care solutions and the technologies The Role of the mHealth in the Fight against the Covid-19 The main role is the traditional one performed in the field of digital health by connecting the citizens to the health system and offering them with the highly innovative technological solutions. The Role of the mHealth in the Fight against the Covid-19 • summarize scientific materials in the languages common to residents; To spread messages in a timely manner(mawed) . • adopt and develop applications: (tetaman) and up on evaluate suspected, cases and follow up on confirmed cases, (tapa’ad) • other applications such as: (sehaty) (Tawakulna) . • It has also activated the role of virtual clinics, telemedicine and remote medical consultations, the teleradiology platform, and medical robotics; To prevent the spread of the new Corona virus. Conclusion M health apps did not affect the people’s contentment for the public health administration, the apps indirectly elevated their satisfaction by meeting the user utilitarian requires and offering the functional (healthcare assurance), the emotional (psychological interventions) Thank you … References • Cao, J., Zhang, G., & Liu, D. (2022, March). The Impact of Using mHealth Apps on Improving Public Health Satisfaction during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Digital Content Value Chain Perspective. In Healthcare (Vol. 10, No. 3, p. 479). MDPI. • King, E., Kinvig, K., Steif, J., Qiu, A. Q., Maan, E. J., Albert, A. Y., … & Murray, M. C. M. (2017). Mobile text messaging to improve medication adherence and viral load in a vulnerable Canadian population living with human immunodeficiency virus: a repeated measures study. Journal of medical Internet research, 19(6). • Dale, L. P., Whittaker, R., Jiang, Y., Stewart, R., Rolleston, A., & Maddison, R. (2015). Text message and internet support for coronary heart disease self-management: results from the Text4Heart randomized controlled trial. Journal of medical Internet research, 17(10), e4944.
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
| Main Postinga | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
|
| Main Post: Timeliness | 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3. |
|
| First Response | 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Second Response | 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
|
| Total Points: 100 | |||||