HCA 610 DQ Methods of Assessing Health Care Organizations’ Operational Needs
HCA 610 DQ Methods of Assessing Health Care Organizations’ Operational Needs
Compare and contrast at least two methods of assessing health care organizations’ operational needs and explain how they differ based upon a particular health care setting.
The WHO Working Group meeting on “Patient safety: rapid assessment methods for assessing
hazards” held in Geneva, Switzerland, 17-19 December 2002, defined seven criteria for
evaluating methods. The first four criteria relate to the intrinsic characteristics of the methods,
their validity, reliability and cost. Some of the literature directly addresses these issues. The last
three criteria relate more to the ability of methods to trigger improvements in safety cultures and
the quality of safety programmes (28). The seven criteria used to evaluate assessment methods
are as follows.
Effectiveness in capturing the extent of harm. Comparative studies, reporting the number of
events identified by one method as compared to a reference list or to another method (most often
the review of medical records), provide the most evidence-based information. We also report
non-comparative results. This criterion concerns the validity of methods, but absolute validity cannot be ascertained since there is no gold standard method (29). Moreover, comparisons do not
really establish validity because the different methods provide different levels of qualitative and
quantitative assessment of hazards. Comparisons may bring out different aspects of hazard
measurement, therefore it is preferable to refer to the effectiveness of methods, rather than to
their validity. The effectiveness of the review of medical records has been the most extensively
studied because its use goes beyond the concerns of hazard identification: it is the usual method
for peer reviews and for investigating substandard care (30). Where available, information is
presented on the effectiveness of methods for studying the preventability and the underlying
causes of adverse events.
Availability of reliable data. Here we report the results of inter-observer reliability studies.
Suitability for large-scale or small, repeated studies. This criterion was addressed by abstracting
experiences of large-scale or small, repeated studies. The focus was essentially on acceptability
and feasibility, since cost is discussed separately. Large-scale studies refer to national and
regional studies. Small, repeated studies are carried out for a limited period at the hospital or
local level. This criterion relates to the validity of methods and to their acceptability by healthcare institutions and professionals.
Costs (financial, human resources, time and burden on system). There is no full economic
evaluation of the burden related to the implementation of various methods. We therefore report
the little information available on the human resources needed to implement the methods.
Obtaining such information is usually a secondary objective of the published studies, and no
details are available on how the calculations were performed. The financial burden obviously
varies widely, depending on health-care organization and country. The most useful information
comes from comparative studies. The viewpoint of the studies is usually the health-care
institutions, so the organizational and operating costs (the direct costs) are measured.
Effectiveness in influencing policy. The professional literature was analysed to find instances of
national, regional or local policy or strategic programmes being influenced by the publication of
data collected using the methods studied.
Effectiveness in influencing hospital and local safety procedures and outcomes. Here we describe
intervention studies evaluating the impact of hazard measurement on clinical practice and on
improving performance.
Synergy with other domains of quality of care. Here we report experiences of the use of methods
for assessing hazards in conjunction with continuous quality improvement and patient safety
programmes.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: HCA 610 DQ Methods of Assessing Health Care Organizations’ Operational Needs
Lopes Write Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Important information for writing discussion questions and participation
Welcome to class
Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to
I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.
Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.
If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.
Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.
Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.
I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!
Hi Class,
Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.
Contact me if you have any questions.
Important information on Writing a Discussion Question
- Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
- There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
- Include in-text citations in your response
- Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
- Follow APA-7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor
- A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
- Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
- Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
- Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
- Follow APA 7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
- Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
- Here are some helpful links
- Student paper example
- Citing Sources
- The Writing Center is a great resource