HC 402 Herzing University Online Leadership Portfolio Worksheet
HC 402 Herzing University Online Leadership Portfolio Worksheet
My Leadership Portfolio Place Your Name Here [Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document. Type the abstract of the document here. The abstract is typically a short summary of the contents of the document.] [Pick the date] Clarify Your Values 1. Examine your past experiences to identify the values you use to make choices and decisions. Write your values here: Note: delete any descriptive text that is in italics. 2. Answer the question, “What is my leadership philosophy?” Make a list of 3-5 leadership qualities that guide your behavior and decisions. 3. Articulate the values that guide your current decisions, priorities, and actions. Write a brief statement about your values. 4. Set the Example. Select at least one activity that you plan to complete. Again, remember to delete the text in italics. Inspire a Vision 5. Make a list of all the things you want to accomplish, and ask yourself “Why?” Write your list below. This can include occupational or personal related goals. 6. Be curious about what is going on around you – especially things that aren’t working well. Make a list of at least three things not working and consider how your vision might address these. 7. Consider how you and others can change your job to a “calling.” Answer this question: “How does my work make the world a better place?” Challenge the Process 8. Challenge is the opportunity for greatness. People do their best when there is the chance to change the status quo. Do something each day so that you are a better you than the day before. Identify at least three opportunities you will try in the next week. Consider a new schedule, a new activity, taking on a new project, searching the Web for something related to what you do, interview a leader in your organization. 9. Consider the lessons that you have learned. Think about a recent success and a recent failure. Describe how each of these has contributed to your personal learning about what it takes to be a leader. Describe at least one success and one failure and how your experiences will change what you would do next time if presented with the same challenge. Enable Others to Act 10. Leaders know they can’t do it alone. Leaders invest in creating trustworthy relationships. Describe at least three ways that you can foster collaboration within your current work environment. 11. Think about your current work supervisor. If you could offer this person one piece of advice to help enable or strengthen your work group, what would you say? This advice might be some simple recommendations. Take care to not include actual names of people. Encourage the Heart 12. Leaders need to continue to encourage others to continue to do the best that they can. Recognition of efforts and celebrating of successes is important. Identify how encouragement or success is celebrated in your current organization. Does this meet your needs? How would like to be recognized? Final Reflection Review your work to this point in your Leadership Portfolio. Summarize and evaluate what you have learned about your own leadership values. Propose values that will continue to influence the ways that you deal with and work with other people. This is a summary of your entire portfolio. This narrative needs to be at least 500 words in length. Appropriate citations should also be included.
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
| Main Postinga | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
|
| Main Post: Timeliness | 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3. |
|
| First Response | 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Second Response | 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
|
| Total Points: 100 | |||||