Grantham University Diabetes Issues Essay
Grantham University Diabetes Issues Essay
cation and might be un ate. Click tor more details Enable Editing Anatomy and Physiology II Writing Assignment: Disease Research Paper Due: November 17, 2019 at 9 pm Description: Student will conduct scientific literature research and write a 4-page paper on a human disease or disorder of choice. The 4 pages do not include the title or the reference page. The disorder must be thoroughly identified and pertain to an organ system being studied in this Human Anatomy and Physiology I only. If your human disease or disorder does not cover one of the organ systems discussed in Human Anatomy I, you will receive -10 points for not following chrections. In order to prevent yourself from receiving the penalty, you must utilize your projected leaming schedule and your textbook Review the chapters that will be covered this semester to determine what human disease or disorder that you find interesting in this course. You do not have to contact me to mfom me about your topic. Be mindful that you picking the correct organ system is part of the grade. If you pick an organ system that isn’t discussed in anatomy and physiology II you will receive a 25-point penalty for not following directions. I good tip would be to look at your projected learning schedule to see all the organ systems that are being discussed this semester to avoid the penalty. Again, you are following directions and identifying your knowledge on the concepts that are being discussed this semester. Directions: 1 You must use a total of four sources. You can utilize your textbook, but you must use three other sources for this research paper. Which will give you a total of four sources. If you don’t use four sources for your paper, you will receive a -5 points deduction. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia cannot be used for this research paper. 2 You must submit your paper in a word document. If you submit your paper in any other text and I can’t open it, you will not receive another opportunity to submit your work. The grade will be a zero for the entire research paper 3 You must have a title page that includes your name, the date, the course’s name, the title of your project (your choice), and a picture of some sort that relates to your disease or disorder. This information should be in the center of the page. If you don’t follow directions for the title page, you will receive a 5-point deduction 4 Your paper should follow APA format for the body of the paper and for the separate References Cited Page. The reference cited page should be at the end of the paper. Please make sure that if you are unfamiliar with APA format, please use resources to help you understand the format. If you need assistance, you may use the citation machine site to assist you in constructing the reference cited page. Plagiarism, as discussed in the syllabus, will result in an automatic ZERO for the paper and referral to the ATC disciplinary committee as outlined in the college catalogue. 5 Carefully follow and complete the format for the paper. This paper should be written in Times New Roman Font. The font size should be 12. This paper may be double spaced. The title page and the reference cited-page should all be bolded. The body (the text) of your research paper should not be bolded. No pictures are to be included in the body of the research paper. The only picture that should be presented in the research paper should be the one on the title page. If you don’t follow the forma directions, you will receive 5 points for the overall paper. Any extra pictures found throughout the body of the research paper a-3 points per picture will be taken off the overall grade of the research paper. 6. Review the grading rubric before, during and after the development of your final draft. The primary purpose of this paper is to inform the reader of a disease or disorder that involves the organ systems in the human body discussed in Anatomy and Physiology II. Also, the goals of this project are reflected in the grading rubric, so be sure that you have met your instructor’s expectations. If the expectations are met regarding the rubric, you will receive the maximum points. If the expectations have not been met, you will receive the possible number of points for what you have completed 7. The dropbox for the research paper will open on September 2, 2019 at 12 am. You will have November 17, 2019 at 9pm to submit your paper.
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
| Main Postinga | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
|
| Main Post: Timeliness | 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3. |
|
| First Response | 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Second Response | 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
|
| Total Points: 100 | |||||