Grantham University Blood Vessel Summary Essay
Grantham University Blood Vessel Summary Essay
Blood Vessels Assignment [Read-Only] – Microsoft Word ences Mailings Review View ALA Aar EE-SE 1 T ab A- 33 » AaBbCcDc AaBbCcDc AaBb C AaBbc Normal No Spacia Heading 1 Heading Paragraph Styles Principles of A&P II (Biol 2114) Albany Technical College Blood Vessels Activity Instructions: Please place your first and last name, the due date, and the name of the assignment: Blood Vessel Summary in the upper right-hand comer of every assignment (-5 if missing). Please type in black ink using Times New Romans with 12 point font (-10 if incorrect). Please use proper spelling, punctuation, and grammar (-2 point for every error). Please paraphrase a Blood Vessel Summary in your own words. This summary should be you summarizing vital information about the blood vessels in the human body. This summary should have at least 500 words. This is an opportunity to present your knowledge in a summary regarding blood vessels. Don’t forget that your summary must include information from the following sections of chapter 15: Blood Vessels. Paths of Circulation, and the Arterial and Venous Systems. If the following sections are not included, you will receive a 20-point deduction for not following directions. At the end of the assignment, you must reference your source, which is the textbook for the activ If the reference is not present at the end of the assignment, a penalty will be applied to the overall grade (-10 iſ missing) Make sure to reference the source using APA style and not MLA. If you don’t reference the source using APA style, a penalty will be applied to the overall grade (-5 if not APA Style). Please see the projected learning schedule for the due and time. If a detailed outline is submitted instead of a summary, a penalty of 40 points will be deducted from the overall grade of the summary. Remember, you are providing a summary and not an outline for this activity. If you submit the same assignment from last week, you will receive a zero. Again, you are providing a summary on just Blood Vessels this week. Use your textbook to avoid confusion regarding the required information for the outline. If you decide to use other references, it is important to make sure you cross-reference your materials to avoid penalties. If information is not accurate, a 2-point penalty will be applied to the incorrect content Again, utilize your book to avoid confusion ID WN 24239 Zacardi Corte you don’t know Stephanie Carter atrike B-1A50 3
A
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
| Main Posting | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
|
| Main Post: Timeliness | 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3. |
|
| First Response | 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Second Response | 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
|
| Total Points: 100 | |||||