FPX 4010 importance of Interprofessional collaboration in improving patient outcomes
Sample Answer for FPX 4010 importance of Interprofessional collaboration in improving patient outcomes Included
Question
For this assessment, you will create a 2-4 page report on an interview you have conducted with a health care professional. You will identify an issue from the interview that could be improved with an interdisciplinary approach, and review best practices and evidence to address the issue.
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: FPX 4010 importance of Interprofessional collaboration in improving patient outcomes
Title: FPX 4010 importance of Interprofessional collaboration in improving patient outcomes
FPX 4010 importance of Interprofessional collaboration in improving patient outcomes
Introduction:
Health care is a diverse and dynamic field that requires the collaboration of various professionals to deliver high-quality care to patients. Interprofessional collaboration refers to the cooperation and coordination of different professionals, such as doctors, nurses, social workers, and others, in order to give a patient the greatest treatment possible (Moncatar et al., 2021). The importance of Interprofessional collaboration has been widely recognized in the health care industry, and its impact on patient outcomes and satisfaction has been extensively researched.
The purpose of this report is to present the findings of an interview with a health care professional regarding the importance of Interprofessional collaboration in improving patient outcomes. The interviewee, who has over 10 years of experience in the health care industry, provided insight into the challenges faced in patient care and the role of Interprofessional collaboration in addressing these challenges.
Issues in Patient Care:
The interviewee noted that one of the biggest challenges in patient care is the fragmented approach to treatment. Each department in a health care facility may have different goals and approaches to treatment, leading to conflicting recommendations for the patient. This can result in a suboptimal outcome for the patient, as all aspects of the patient’s health and wellbeing are not taken into account.
For example, consider a patient with a chronic condition, such as heart disease, and requires care from multiple departments, such as cardiology, neurology, and rehabilitation. In this scenario, each department may have its own approach to treatment based on their area of expertise and their individual goals. This can result in conflicting recommendations for the patient and create a fragmented approach to the patient’s care. For instance, the cardiology department may focus primarily on managing the patient’s heart disease by prescribing medications, conducting regular check-ups, and performing tests to monitor the patient’s heart health (Sanz et al., 2020). Meanwhile, the neurology department may focus on addressing any neurological symptoms related to the patient’s condition, such as memory problems or headaches, and may prescribe different medications or therapies to manage these symptoms. The rehabilitation department, on the other hand, may focus on helping the patient regain strength and mobility through physical therapy and other exercises. While each department is working towards the overall goal of improving the patient’s health, the lack of coordination and collaboration among the departments can lead to conflicting recommendations for the patient. For example, the medications prescribed by the cardiology department may interact negatively with the medications prescribed by the neurology department, leading to adverse side effects for the patient.
Furthermore, the lack of communication and coordination among departments can result in a duplication of efforts, which can be both time-consuming and costly. When different departments are not communicating with each other, they may be performing the same tests or procedures, or prescribing the same medications, without realizing it (Li et al., 2019). This not only wastes valuable time and resources, but can also increase the risk of adverse events or side effects for the patient. In addition, the lack of communication and coordination among departments can lead to confusion and frustration for the patient, who may receive conflicting information from different departments. For example, the patient may receive conflicting advice on their diet or exercise routine from different departments, or may receive conflicting information about the results of their tests or procedures. This can cause confusion and uncertainty for the patient, who may not know which advice or information to follow. This type of fragmented approach to care can also have a negative impact on the patient’s experience and satisfaction. Patients expect to receive comprehensive and coordinated care, and when they receive conflicting information or advice from different departments, they may feel that their care is disjointed and that their healthcare providers are not working together as a team. This can result in decreased trust in the healthcare system, and may lead to dissatisfaction with the care received.
Interprofessional Collaboration as a Solution:
The interviewee highlighted the importance of Interprofessional collaboration in addressing the challenges faced in patient care. By bringing together professionals from different fields, such as doctors, nurses, social workers, and others, a more comprehensive approach to treatment can be developed. This ensures that all aspects of the patient’s health and wellbeing are taken into account, leading to improved patient outcomes.
Interprofessional collaboration can also help to improve communication and coordination among departments, reducing the likelihood of conflicting recommendations and duplicated efforts (Alderwick et al., 2021). It can also result in a more efficient delivery of health care services, as all professionals are working together towards a common goal.
Best Practices and Evidence:
Research has shown that Interprofessional collaboration results in improved patient outcomes, improved patient’s satisfaction, and increased efficiency in health care delivery. Some best practices for Interprofessional collaboration include regular Interprofessional meetings, the use of technology, such as electronic health records, to improve communication and coordination, and the development of a unified treatment plan.
Regular Interprofessional meetings can provide an opportunity for professionals from different departments to discuss the progress of a patient, share information, and develop a unified treatment plan. This can help to ensure that all aspects of the patient’s health and wellbeing are taken into account, leading to improved patient outcomes.
The use of technology, such as electronic health records, can also play a crucial role in improving communication and coordination among departments. Electronic health records provide a centralized database of patient information that can be accessed by all departments, reducing the likelihood of conflicting recommendations and duplicated efforts.
The development of a unified treatment plan is another important aspect of Interprofessional collaboration (Bowman et al., 2021). This involves all departments working together to develop a comprehensive treatment plan for a patient, taking into account all aspects of the patient’s health and wellbeing. A unified treatment plan can help to ensure that all professionals involved in the patient’s care are working towards a common goal, reducing the likelihood of conflicting recommendations and improving patient outcomes.
FPX 4010 importance of Interprofessional collaboration in improving patient outcomes Conclusion:
In conclusion, Interprofessional collaboration is an important aspect of health care that can lead to improved patient outcomes, increased patient satisfaction, and increased efficiency in health care delivery. By bringing together professionals from different fields, a more comprehensive approach to treatment can be developed, taking into account all aspects of the patient’s health and wellbeing. The use of technology, such as electronic health records, and regular Interprofessional meetings can also be quite significant in improving communication and coordination among departments.
It is important for health care facilities to understand the importance of Interprofessional collaboration and to implement best practices and evidence-based approaches in order to deliver the best possible care to patients. The findings of this imaginary interview provide insight into the challenges faced in patient care and the role of Interprofessional collaboration in addressing these challenges, highlighting the importance of Interprofessional collaboration in improving patient outcomes.
FPX 4010 importance of Interprofessional collaboration in improving patient outcomes References
Alderwick, H., Hutchings, A., Briggs, A., & Mays, N. (2021). The impacts of collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations and factors shaping how they work: A systematic review of reviews. BMC Public Health, 21, 1–16.
Bowman, K. S., Suarez, V. D., & Weiss, M. J. (2021). Standards for interprofessional collaboration in the treatment of individuals with autism. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 14(4), 1191–1208.
Li, P., Nelson, S. D., Malin, B. A., & Chen, Y. (2019). DMMS: A decentralized blockchain ledger for the management of medication histories. Blockchain in Healthcare Today, 2.
Moncatar, T. R. T., Nakamura, K., Siongco, K. L. L., Seino, K., Carlson, R., Canila, C. C., Javier, R. S., & Lorenzo, F. M. E. (2021). Interprofessional collaboration and barriers among health and social workers caring for older adults: A Philippine case study. Human Resources for Health, 19, 1–14.
Sanz, M., Marco del Castillo, A., Jepsen, S., Gonzalez‐Juanatey, J. R., D’Aiuto, F., Bouchard, P., Chapple, I., Dietrich, T., Gotsman, I., & Graziani, F. (2020). Periodontitis and cardiovascular diseases: Consensus report. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 47(3), 268–288.
A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: FPX 4010 importance of Interprofessional collaboration in improving patient outcomes
Title: FPX 4010 importance of Interprofessional collaboration in improving patient outcomes
As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, your participation and leadership in interdisciplinary teams will be vital to the health outcomes for your patients and organization. One way to approach designing an improvement project is to use the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement describes it thus:
The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle is shorthand for testing a change in the real work setting—by planning it, trying it, observing the results, and acting on what is learned. This is the scientific method adapted for action-oriented learning…Essentially, the PDSA cycle helps you test out change ideas on a smaller scale before evaluating the results and making adjustments before potentially launching into a somewhat larger scale project (n.d.).
You might also recognize that the PDSA cycle resembles the nursing process. The benefit of gaining experience with this model of project design is that it provides nurses with an opportunity to ideate and lead improvements. For this assessment, you will not be implementing all of the PDSA cycle. Instead, you are being asked to interview a health care professional of your choice to determine what kind of interdisciplinary problem he or she is experiencing or has experienced in the workplace. This interview, in Assessment 2, will inform the research that you will conduct to propose a plan for interdisciplinary collaboration in Assessment 3.
FPX 4010 importance of Interprofessional collaboration in improving patient outcomes Reference
Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (n.d.). How to improve.Retrieved from http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/HowtoImprove/default.aspx
Demonstration of Proficiency
Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.
Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could be relevant in establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.
Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.
Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.
Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.
Describe change theories and a leadership strategy that could help develop an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
Communicate with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.
Professional Context
This assessment will introduce the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Model to create change in an organization. By interviewing a colleague of your choice, you will begin gathering information about an interprofessional collaboration problem that your colleague is experiencing or has experienced. You will identify a change theory and leadership strategies to help solve this problem.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: FPX 4010 importance of Interprofessional collaboration in improving patient outcomes
Scenario
This assessment is the first of three related assessments in which you will gather interview information (Assessment 2); design a proposal for interdisciplinary problem-solving, (Assessment 3); and report on how an interdisciplinary improvement plan could be implemented in a place of practice (Assessment 4). At the end of the course, your interviewee will have a proposal plan based on the PDSA cycle that he or she could present to stakeholders to address an interdisciplinary problem in the workplace.
For this assessment, you will need to interview a health care professional such as a fellow learner, nursing colleague, administrator, business partner, or another appropriate person who could provide you with sufficient information regarding an organizational problem that he or she is experiencing or has experienced, or an area where they are seeking improvements. Consult the Interview Guide [DOCX] for an outline of how to prepare and the types of information you will need to complete this project successfully.
Remember: this is just the first in a series of three assessments.
Instructions
For this assessment, you will report on the information that you collected in your interview, analyzing the interview data and identifying a past or current issue that would benefit from an interdisciplinary approach. This could be an issue that has not been addressed by an interdisciplinary approach or one that could benefit from improvements related to the interdisciplinary approach currently being used. Additionally, you will start laying the foundation for your Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal (Assessment 3) by researching potential change theories, leadership strategies, and collaboration approaches that could be relevant to issue you have identified.
When submitting your plan, use the Interview and Issue Identification Template [DOCX],which will help you to stay organized and concise. As you complete the template, make sure you use APA format for in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that are informing your plan, as well as for the reference list at the end.
Additionally, be sure to address the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.
Summarize an interview focused on past or current issues at a health care organization.
Identify an issue from an interview for which an evidence-based interdisciplinary approach would be appropriate.
Describe potential change theories and a leadership strategies that could inform an interdisciplinary solution to an organizational issue.
Describe collaboration approaches from the literature that could facilitate establishing or improving an interdisciplinary team to address an organizational issue.
Communicate with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, and using current APA style.
Additional Requirements
Length of submission:Use the provided template. Most submissions will be 2 to 4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.
Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.
FPX 4010 importance of Interprofessional collaboration in improving patient outcomes Grading Rubric
| Performance Category | 100% or highest level of performance
100% 16 points |
Very good or high level of performance
88% 14 points |
Acceptable level of performance
81% 13 points |
Inadequate demonstration of expectations
68% 11 points |
Deficient level of performance
56% 9 points
|
Failing level
of performance 55% or less 0 points |
| Total Points Possible= 50 | 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points |
| Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics. |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements
|
| 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points | |
| Application of Course Knowledge
Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements
|
| 10 Points | 9 Points | 6 Points | 0 Points | |||
| Interactive Dialogue
Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic. |
Demonstrated all of the following:
|
Demonstrated 3 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 2 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:
|
||
| 8 Points | 7 Points | 6 Points | 5 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
| Grammar, Syntax, APA
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error. |
The following was present:
AND
AND
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
| 0 Points Deducted | 5 Points Lost | |||||
| Participation
Requirements |
Demonstrated the following:
|
Failed to demonstrate the following:
|
||||
| 0 Points Lost | 5 Points Lost | |||||
| Due Date Requirements | Demonstrated all of the following:
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Demonstrates one or less of the following.
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |