Ethical Theories Applied to Decision Making

Ethical Theories Applied to Decision Making

Question 1

Ethical theories and approaches provide an accepted code of conduct for deciding in the wake of adversity. In my first job as an intern, I was assigned to an organization that rescues young boys from abusive homes. The organization had set up a rescue center where boys under 12 years were protected from abusive parents. I joined the organization when it was starting. My responsibilities included setting up the canter, buying furniture and beddings, preparing the boarding rooms, hiring the chef, and welcoming the boys. One month after joining the center, we received our first guest. Within a month, the center had received a total of 20 boys. The boys were difficult to deal with since most had a history of physical and sexual abuse from their guardians. Some of the boys were recovering drug addict, and they experienced some episodes once in a while. However, the most challenging aspect of my job was dealing with the founding director Mr. Hodec. The director was an abusive middle-aged man who had been convicted of child abuse in the past. Using his networks, he had managed to conceal this information from the children’s department and got approval to set up the rescue center. Mr. Hodec would abuse the boys verbally, especially when they raised a complaint regarding the center. Over the weekend, the boys were allowed to go home, and most came back beaten. We raised the issue with Mr. Hodec, but he insisted that the boys should keep going home. During one incident, one of the boys came back with bruises after being assaulted by his stepfather. Mr. Hodec was the first person to see the boy, and upon seeing the bruises, he told the boy to go and clean-up to hide the bruises. Disappointed, in anguish and mad, the boy tried to commit suicide, and that is when I realized I needed to step up to help the boys. I drafted a resignation letter, handed it to Mr. Hodec and went to the children’s department to report the incident. My report prompted the Children’s department to investigate Mr. Hodec conduct and history regarding violence. The investigation revealed that Mr. Hodec was unfit to run the rescue center, and his license was revoked, and the boys transferred to another center. In this situation, I applied the utilitarianism theory of ethics in arriving at a decision (Mill 2016). According to utilitarianism theory, the ethical decision should be made based on the greatest good for many people. According to this theory, one should self-sacrifice to attain a greater good for many people. In this situation, I had to sacrifice my job to rescue the boys. I couldn’t safeguard both my job and the boy’s well-being. The utilitarianism theory is based on the potential outcome of a decision (Wallace 2019). Instead of weighing the choice and consequences of a decision, a decisionmaker is forced to overlook the minority. In my situation, the minority parties were Mr.Hodec and I. We had to lose our livelihoods to safeguard the interests of the majority. Question 2 In my final year of studying, I opened a small clinic alongside my friend Thomas. The clinic was located in an informal estate where a majority of the residents are low-income earners. Initially, we use to offer simple clinical services like treating colds, dressing wounds, offering, and first aid services. The clinic was starting to pick up with clients referring their friends and family. Though I had not graduated, my friend Thomas was a licensed clinician registered with the board. We used his license to register the clinic to meet the legal requirements. Our services were highly affordable since we understood our target market. One afternoon, a young lady who seemed to be in anguish walked into the clinic. I was on duty that day as Thomas was away buying medicines. The lady was complaining of abdominal pains. I did a quick assessment of the patient and recommended that we do a laboratory test. I noticed that the lady was hesitant to conduct the tests. As a medic, I could not treat her without a proper understanding of the condition; hence, I opted to call an ambulance to take her to the nearest hospital. Upon realization that the matter was escalating, the lady chose to open up and revealed that she had had an attempt to terminate a pregnancy. She went on to request my services to terminate the pregnancy successfully. This situation presented a moral dilemma. Being a nurse and a pro-life, I could not aid in terminating a life. On the other hand, the young lady had made it clear that she was not ready to be a mother, and she wanted to terminate the pregnancy. Meanwhile, her condition was worsening. She had started bleeding, and I knew she needed medical attention urgently to save her life and the baby. After consideration, I decided to save the young lady and the unborn baby and called an ambulance. I informed the medics that the lady had suffered a fall and needed medical attention to save her and the baby. Though I knew it affected the lady’s well-being, I felt I did the right thing by saving the baby. The situation when I experienced Moral Suffering One of my responsibilities as a medic is to inspire society to always choose right over wrong (Hashemi, Ahsan & Kirnon-Jackman 2018). While working as an intern at the general hospital, I was assigned to the emergency services department. One afternoon, we received a call from the local police regarding a hostage situation in the mall. As the nearest hospital, we were providing emergency services to the rescued hostages. One of the injured patients was criminal. He was shot in a shootout with the police. The moral suffering has to treat and save the life of a criminal, who had injured and killed several people. The choice was not easy, but remembering that my call as a medic is to treat, made it easier for me to treat the criminal. References Hashemi, S., Ahsan, S. D., & Kirnon-Jackman, O. (2018). KCL Clinical and Academic Research Society (CARS) & NSAMR National Student Research Conference 2018. Journal of the National Student Association of Medical Research, 1(1), 18-19. Mill, J. S. (2016). Utilitarianism. In Seven masterpieces of philosophy (pp. 337-383). Routledge. Wallace, J. D. (2019). Moral relevance and moral conflict. Cornell University Press. Ethical principles Ethics of care Utilitarianism Deontology Natural law theory Justice Autonomy Beneficence. Deontology is one of the most significant theories in the nursing field. Essentially, this theory is fundamental in the conflict solving process. While deontology does not help resolve disputes by acting like an absolute tool, it does that by defining one’s character that influences their decision making (Haynes, 2016). In this case, an individual is bound to make decisions based on obligations and accountabilities of the subject. Profoundly, human actions should be judged according to one’s duties concerning their morals. It means that the characteristics of a particular action renders it morally upright and not the consequences of that action. But some actions are indistinguishable hence rendering them morally good on the Deontology basis might be inappropriate (Cook, 2018). However, since there exist several theories an approach, then such actions might fall under a different elucidation. Among the existing essential ethical theories, Deontology theory has dominated a significant part of my career beliefs (Hunt & Vitell, 2016). One of my roles as a nurse was to administer medicine to admitted patients according to doctor’s prescription. At one instance, I was to collect oxycodone from the hospital’s pharmacy, for a patient who was under intense pain. But to my surprise, the drugs were out of stock. According to the records, previously ordered oxycodone ought to have lasted until the next supply. I inquired about the inconvenience from the pharmacist in charge, and she denied. But after a few intimidations on reporting her to the medical officer in charge of the overall hospital, she admitted to having taken some home without the doctor’s consent. According to the hospital’s policy and moral ethics as well, such an act is bound to reporting. But when I learned that she had taken those drugs to take to her sick uncle who could not afford seeking services from the hospital, I let the issue go. Question 2: Has there ever been a time when you have experienced the dilemma of having to make a choice that you know will affect the well-being of another individual? Have you ever experienced moral suffering? Indeed, I have faced several tight spot situations in my nursing career, which have compelled me to make morally tormenting decisions. One Sunday evening, while I was in charge, the maternity ward was full. The hospitals’ policy clearly indicated that no patient should be discharged on a Sunday regardless of their condition. I received a young woman who was apparently experiencing her labor pains. However, the admission ward did not have space for her. But a lady had already spent enough time in the hospital after delivery, and she was scheduled for discharge on the following day. From the look of things, the woman appeared okay, and she would have provided space for the lady I pain without any inconveniences. But discharging her on that day was a violation of the institution’s policy, and I would have risked my job. So, I had to instruct the lady in pain together with her accomplices to find help from another hospital, while I knew that no hospital was nearby. References Cook, T. (2018). Deontologists Can Be Moderate. The Journal of Value Inquiry, 199-212. Haynes, F. (2016). Ethics and Education. Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1-5. Hunt, S., & Vitell, S. J. (2016). Personal Moral Codes and the Hunt-Vitell Theory of Ethics: Why Do People’s Ethical Judgments Differ?. . In Business ethics: New challenges for business school and corporate leaders.

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

 

Supported by at least three credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

15 (15%) – 16 (16%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.

Total Points: 100