Emerging Wireless Technology in the Healthcare

Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

Emerging Wireless Technology in the Healthcare

Emerging Wireless Technology in the Healthcare

Case Study 1: Emerging Wireless Technology in the Healthcare Industry

The medical industry is a good example of an industry that must balance the security issues associated with wireless technologies with the business value added from wireless technologies.

Read the article about emerging wireless medical technologies titled, “How 5G (and concomitant technologies) will revolutionize healthcare”

Read the Information Week article about how wireless and mobile devices will change the healthcare practices titled “Strategy: How Mobility, Apps and BYOD Will Transform Healthcare”.

Write a 4-page paper in which you do the following:

Summarize the current and emerging wireless medical technologies.

Describe the wireless components needed for added business value in the healthcare environment.

Assess the additional staffing and support requirements needed to support the wireless technologies.

Analyze the potential technical and regulatory problems with implementing a wireless network in a healthcare organization and describe the mitigation methods to overcome these potential problems in the healthcare industry.

Use at least three quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar websites do not qualify as quality resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Be typed, double-spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with 1-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are as follows:

Compare and contrast wireless systems and their recent advances.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:Emerging Wireless Technology in the Healthcare

Evaluate the application of wireless LANs, MANs, and PANs.

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

Rubric Criteria

Total70 points

Criterion	1. Unsatisfactory	2. Less Than Satisfactory	3. Satisfactory	4. Good	5. Excellent
Layout Layout	0 points The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.	2.8 points The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.	3.08 points The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.	3.22 points The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.	3.5 points The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
Presentation of Content Presentation of Content	0 points The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.	2.8 points The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.	3.08 points The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.	3.22 points The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.	3.5 points The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
Discussion of Potential Strengths and Limitations of the Technology Discussion of Potential Strengths and Limitations of the Technology	0 points Discussion of the potential strengths and limitations of the technology is not present.	5.6 points Discussion of the potential strengths and limitations of the technology is present but incomplete.	6.16 points Discussion of the potential strengths and limitations of the technology is present but done at a perfunctory level.	6.44 points Discussion of the potential strengths and limitations of the technology is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	7 points Discussion of the potential strengths and limitations of the technology is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
Documentation of Sources Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	0 points Sources are not documented.	5.6 points Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	6.16 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	6.44 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	7 points Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Applicable Theory to Guide Presentation Applicable Theory to Guide Presentation	0 points Discussion of applicable theory to guide presentation is not present.	8.4 points Discussion of applicable theory to guide presentation is present but incomplete.	9.24 points Discussion of applicable theory to guide presentation is present but done at a perfunctory level.	9.66 points Discussion of applicable theory to guide presentation is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	10.5 points Discussion of applicable theory to guide presentation is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
How the Technology Will Assist in Resolving the Select Clinical Problem How the Technology Will Assist in Resolving the Select Clinical Problem	0 points Discussion of how the technology will assist in resolving the select clinical problem is not present.	8.4 points Discussion of how the technology will assist in resolving the select clinical problem is present but incomplete.	9.24 points Discussion of how the technology will assist in resolving the select clinical problem is present but done at a perfunctory level.	9.66 points Discussion of how the technology will assist in resolving the select clinical problem is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	10.5 points Discussion of how the technology will assist in resolving the select clinical problem is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)	0 points Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.	2.8 points Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.	3.08 points Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.	3.22 points The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.	3.5 points The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	0 points Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.	5.6 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.	6.16 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.	6.44 points Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.	7 points Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.
Brief Description of Clinical Problem Brief Description of Clinical Problem	0 points Brief description of clinical problem is not present.	5.6 points Brief description of clinical problem is present but incomplete.	6.16 points Brief description of clinical problem is present but done at a perfunctory level.	6.44 points Brief description of clinical problem is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	7 points Brief description of clinical problem is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
Problem-Specific Technology to Improve Patient Outcomes Problem-Specific Technology to Improve Patient Outcomes	0 points Discussion of a problem-specific technology to improve patient outcomes is not present.	8.4 points Discussion of a problem-specific technology to improve patient outcomes is present but incomplete.	9.24 points Discussion of a problem-specific technology to improve patient outcomes is present but done at a perfunctory level.	9.66 points Discussion of a problem-specific technology to improve patient outcomes is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.	10.5 points Discussion of a problem-specific technology to improve patient outcomes is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3. Satisfactory

4. Good

5. Excellent

Layout

0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

2.8 points

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

3.08 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

3.22 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

3.5 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

Presentation of Content

0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

2.8 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.

3.08 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization or in their relationships to each other.

3.22 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.

3.5 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

Discussion of Potential Strengths and Limitations of the Technology

0 points

Discussion of the potential strengths and limitations of the technology is not present.

5.6 points

Discussion of the potential strengths and limitations of the technology is present but incomplete.

6.16 points

Discussion of the potential strengths and limitations of the technology is present but done at a perfunctory level.

6.44 points

Discussion of the potential strengths and limitations of the technology is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.

7 points

Discussion of the potential strengths and limitations of the technology is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

Documentation of Sources

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

0 points

Sources are not documented.

5.6 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

6.16 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

6.44 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

7 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Applicable Theory to Guide Presentation

0 points

Discussion of applicable theory to guide presentation is not present.

8.4 points

Discussion of applicable theory to guide presentation is present but incomplete.

9.24 points

Discussion of applicable theory to guide presentation is present but done at a perfunctory level.

9.66 points

Discussion of applicable theory to guide presentation is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.

10.5 points

Discussion of applicable theory to guide presentation is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

How the Technology Will Assist in Resolving the Select Clinical Problem

0 points

Discussion of how the technology will assist in resolving the select clinical problem is not present.

8.4 points

Discussion of how the technology will assist in resolving the select clinical problem is present but incomplete.

9.24 points

Discussion of how the technology will assist in resolving the select clinical problem is present but done at a perfunctory level.

9.66 points

Discussion of how the technology will assist in resolving the select clinical problem is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.

10.5 points

Discussion of how the technology will assist in resolving the select clinical problem is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

2.8 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

3.08 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

3.22 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

3.5 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

0 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

5.6 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

6.16 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.

6.44 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

7 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

Brief Description of Clinical Problem

0 points

Brief description of clinical problem is not present.

5.6 points

Brief description of clinical problem is present but incomplete.

6.16 points

Brief description of clinical problem is present but done at a perfunctory level.

6.44 points

Brief description of clinical problem is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.

7 points

Brief description of clinical problem is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

Problem-Specific Technology to Improve Patient Outcomes

0 points

Discussion of a problem-specific technology to improve patient outcomes is not present.

8.4 points

Discussion of a problem-specific technology to improve patient outcomes is present but incomplete.

9.24 points

Discussion of a problem-specific technology to improve patient outcomes is present but done at a perfunctory level.

9.66 points

Discussion of a problem-specific technology to improve patient outcomes is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.

10.5 points

Discussion of a problem-specific technology to improve patient outcomes is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

Order Now

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.