DNP-815A TOPIC 2 DQ 1 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP-815A TOPIC 2 DQ 1 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning

Topic 2 DQ 1

Jul 14-16, 2022

Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning. Describe how inductive versus deductive reasoning is used in your chosen nursing theory. Provide examples and literature support.

REPLY TO DISCUSSION

Ruby Minda Dangan

Jul 16, 2022, 11:58 PM

Unread

Replies to Ruby Minda Dangan

The reasoning is categorized into two types which are inductive or forward and deductive or backward wherein each has different features and plays different roles in providing solutions to complex problems. The inductive reasoning process is that individual facts are observed first before making a conclusion on a principle, however, the deductive reasoning process is solving given problems based on consideration of general principles and knowledge of a solid foundation. In order to achieve the major goal, inductive reasoning or means-ends analysis is considered a data-driven approach and more useful in finding a solution quickly, whereas deductive reasoning or moving backward gradually gets rids of things that are not necessary and spends more time deleting wrong answers or inferences to look for the root causes of a problem (Shin, 2019).

Middle-range theories serve as frameworks for evidence-based projects and research studies in guiding the interpretation and application of the findings where it illuminates research and structure knowledge to build nursing science and nursing practice (Valentine & Sekula, 2020). PICOT is one way to streamline the process of research literature and by using it as a format, it focuses the search for evidence. Concentrating on evidence of effective interventions is a good way of improving clinical judgment and prevents one’s practice of falling into traditional care without any advancements (Black, 2019).

The concepts of inductive and deductive reasoning in clinical reasoning apply to gathering appropriate information and making a clinical diagnosis by providing scientific evidence on the outcomes of good quality nursing care.

References

Black, B, P. (2019). The science of nursing and evidence-based practice. Professional Nursing E-Book: Concepts and Challenges, 217.

Professional Nursing E-Book – Google Books

Shin, H.S. (2019). Reasoning processes in clinical reasoning: from the perspective of cognitive psychology. Korean Journal of Medical Education, 31 (4), 299-308.

https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2019.140

Valentine, J.L., Sekula, K., Lynch (2020) Evolution of forensic theory- introduction of the constructed theory of forensic nursing care: A Middle-Range Theory. Journal of Forensic Nursing

Valentine_May2020_Evolution_of_Forensic_Nursing_Theory.pdf (researchgate.net)

Diana Goulart

replied toRuby Minda Dangan

Jul 17, 2022, 9:06 AM

Unread

Replies to Ruby Minda Dangan

Great job on your post. I like it a lot. My favorite part was when you mentioned that nurses are responsible for life-long learning and that this is to prevent stagnation as well as harm to the clients we care for. In an article done by Mlambo, Silén, and McGrath in 2021, it was talked about not only how important it is for nursing professionals to continue education as well as development; however, there is also a negative. This study found that education or professional development opportunities are not as available as they should be for the nurses in question (Mlambo, Silén, & McGrath, 2021). This is something I have noticed in the clinical setting. Oftentimes, the facility will assign education to the staff; however, when it came to professional development, things became a little more difficult. For example, there is little to no reimbursement for a practicing ER nurse to take the CEN (Certified Emergency Nurse) board exam which costs several hundreds of dollars. Then, when this certification is achieved, that has to be renewed every 4 years, the nurse only gets a couple of dollars an hour increase. This does not give a lot of incentive to get said certification. Also, many nurses are already BSN upon undergraduate graduation. This means, education-wise, the nurse needs now a master’s or doctorate degree, which very few facilities cover fully. Continuing education and development are important; however, it needs to be more attainable for said nurses.

References

Mlambo, M., Silén, C., & McGrath, C. (2021). Lifelong learning and nurses’ continuing professional development, a metasynthesis of the literature – BMC nursing. BioMed Central. Retrieved July 17, 2022, from https://bmcnurs.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12912-021-00579-2#citeas

Jenevieve Chibuike

replied toRuby Minda Dangan

Jul 19, 2022, 1:45 PM

Unread

Replies to Ruby Minda Dangan

What an insightful post this is. I cannot agree with you less when you noted that “Middle-range theories serve as frameworks for evidence-based projects and research studies.” My PICOT, quality improvement project, will be underpinned by two theoretical lens of which middle-range theory is one of them. I paired it with Faith Community Theory of Nursing because two provides clear direction on how to navigate the process including data collection and data analysis. Alligood and Fawcett (2017) noted that limited, narrower,

DNP-815A TOPIC 2 DQ 1 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning

and easily explored attributes of middle-range theories made the allure in nursing practice. It is important to state that middle range theories and Faith Community Theory of nursing guide evidence-based studies or projects such as DNP projects, in addition to providing a solid foundation for nursing practice. Nursing theories attempts to describe, predict, or explain phenomena consistent with nursing’s perspective (Dewey, 2017), It is important to stress that the product of nursing science is nursing practice.

References

Alligood, M. R., & Fawcett, J. (2017). The Theory of the Art of Nursing and the Practice of Human Care Quality. Visions: The Journal of Rogerian Nursing Science, 23(1), 4–12.

Dewey, J. (2020). Nursing theory. Salem Press Encyclopedia of Health.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP-815A TOPIC 2 DQ 1 Discuss the differences in approach based on inductive versus deductive reasoning

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis. Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion	Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis. Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion. Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.	Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions. Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation. The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable	No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions. Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category	10	9	8	4	0
Application of Course Knowledge – Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources; Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.	Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources. Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content	Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson. Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson	Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post. Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life	Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category	5	4	3	2	0
Interactive Dialogue Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days. *(5 points possible per graded thread)*	Exceeds minimum post requirements Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days. Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days Replies to a question posed by a peer Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.	Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days. The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty	Has only one post for the week Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments	Does not post to the thread No connections are made to the topic
	Minus 1 Point	Minus 2 Point	Minus 3 Point	Minus 4 Point	Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted. Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition	2-3 errors in APA format. Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors. Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.	4-5 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is somewhat focused.	6-7 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.	8-10 errors in APA format. Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.	Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format. Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors. Writing style does not facilitate communication. The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
	0 points lost				-5 points lost
Total Participation Requirements *per discussion thread*	The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day.				The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days
Early Participation Requirement *per discussion thread*	The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.				The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.

Check Out Also: DNP-815 Topic 1 DQ 2 Define the nursing theory and explain its role and contribution to the profession of nursing