DNP-815A PICOT-D Question Submission

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP-815A PICOT-D Question Submission

Assessment Description

The purpose of this assignment (noncredit) is to present your final PICOT-D question for your Direct Practice Improvement (DPI) Project to your faculty for any last-minute changes needed before your Final PICOT-D submission for program approval in Topic 7.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Directions:

Using the “PICOT-D Question Template,” located in the DC Network, fully fill out the PICOT-D question using all templated statements and ensuring your original research articles are listed to the assignment dropbox.
Utilize feedback received on prior PICOT Question Submissions (DNP-801A, DNP 805A and DNP-815A).
The PICOT-D Question Template must be saved using this format: Learner first name.learner last name.course#.date.doc. Example: Mary.Smith.DNPXXX.XX.XX.2020.doc (if not labeled correctly, this submission will be not be reviewed and will be returned to you)
Make sure you made 100% of all the previous changes from your previous reviews.

Portfolio Practice Immersion Hours:

It may be possible to earn portfolio practice immersion hours for this assignment. Enter the following after the References section of your paper:

Practice Immersion Hours Completion Statement DNP-815A

I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed and logged (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I also have tracked said practice immersion hours in the Lopes Activity Tracker for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice immersion preceptor/mentor before the end of the course.

ICOT-D Question Submission – Rubric

LISTGRID

PRINT TO PDF

Rubric Criteria

Total50 points

Criterion	1. Unsatisfactory	2. Less Than Satisfactory	3. Satisfactory	4. Good	5. Excellent
Rationale Rationale	0 points A rationale for the selected topic is not included.	6 points A rationale for the selected topic is incomplete or incorrect.	6.6 points A rationale for the selected topic is included but lacks evidence.	6.9 points A rationale for the selected topic is complete and includes a sufficient amount of evidence.	7.5 points A rationale for the selected topic is extremely thorough with substantial evidence.
Outcome Outcome	0 points A description of the outcome is not included.	4 points A description of the outcomes is incomplete or incorrect.	4.4 points A description of the outcome is included but lacks evidence.	4.6 points A description of the outcome is complete and includes a sufficient amount of evidence.	5 points A description of the outcome is extremely thorough with substantial evidence.
Population Population	0 points A description of population being assessed is not included.	4 points A description of population being assessed is incomplete or incorrect.	4.4 points A description of population being assessed is included but lacks a link to direct practice improvements that could be measured through patient and practice outcomes.	4.6 points A description of population being assessed is complete and includes a direct link to practice improvements that can be measured through patient and practice outcomes.	5 points A description of population being assessed can be linked to direct practice improvements and is extremely thorough with substantial supporting evidence.
Timeline Timeline	0 points A description of the timeline is not included.	4 points A description of the timeline is incomplete or incorrect.	4.4 points A description of the timeline is included but lacks evidence.	4.6 points A description of the timelines is complete and includes a sufficient amount of evidence.	5 points A description of the timeline is extremely thorough with substantial evidence.
Comparison Comparison	0 points A description of the comparison information is not included.	4 points A description of the comparison information is incomplete or incorrect.	4.4 points A description of the comparison information is included but lacks evidence and measurable outcomes.	4.6 points A description of the comparison information is complete and includes a sufficient amount of evidence and measurable outcomes.	5 points A description of the comparison information is extremely thorough with substantial evidence and measurable outcomes.
Documentation of Sources Documentation of Sources Citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.	0 points Sources are not documented.	4 points Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	4.4 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	4.6 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	5 points Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Original Research Original Research Original research for the PICOT-D is attached.	0 points Original research for the PICOT-D is not attached.	4 points NA	4.4 points NA	4.6 points NA	5 points Original research for the PICOT-D is attached.
Intervention Intervention	0 points A description of the intervention is not included.	4 points A description of the intervention is incomplete or incorrect.	4.4 points A description of the intervention is included but lacks a sufficient amount of evidence.	4.6 points A description of the intervention is complete and includes a sufficient amount of evidence and is supported by literature.	5 points A description of the intervention is extremely thorough with substantial evidence and supporting literature.
Paper Format Paper Format Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment.	0 points Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	4 points Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	4.4 points Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	4.6 points Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	5 points All format elements are correct.
Mechanics of Writing Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use.	0 points Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used	2 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	2.2 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	2.3 points Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	2.5 points Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3. Satisfactory

4. Good

5. Excellent

Rationale

Rationale

0 points

A rationale for the selected topic is not included.

6 points

A rationale for the selected topic is incomplete or incorrect.

6.6 points

A rationale for the selected topic is included but lacks evidence.

6.9 points

A rationale for the selected topic is complete and includes a sufficient amount of evidence.

7.5 points

A rationale for the selected topic is extremely thorough with substantial evidence.

Outcome

Outcome

0 points

A description of the outcome is not included.

4 points

A description of the outcomes is incomplete or incorrect.

4.4 points

A description of the outcome is included but lacks evidence.

4.6 points

A description of the outcome is complete and includes a sufficient amount of evidence.

5 points

A description of the outcome is extremely thorough with substantial evidence.

Population

Population

0 points

A description of population being assessed is not included.

4 points

A description of population being assessed is incomplete or incorrect.

4.4 points

A description of population being assessed is included but lacks a link to direct practice improvements that could be measured through patient and practice outcomes.

4.6 points

A description of population being assessed is complete and includes a direct link to practice improvements that can be measured through patient and practice outcomes.

5 points

A description of population being assessed can be linked to direct practice improvements and is extremely thorough with substantial supporting evidence.

Timeline

Timeline

0 points

A description of the timeline is not included.

4 points

A description of the timeline is incomplete or incorrect.

4.4 points

A description of the timeline is included but lacks evidence.

4.6 points

A description of the timelines is complete and includes a sufficient amount of evidence.

5 points

A description of the timeline is extremely thorough with substantial evidence.

Comparison

Comparison

0 points

A description of the comparison information is not included.

4 points

A description of the comparison information is incomplete or incorrect.

4.4 points

A description of the comparison information is included but lacks evidence and measurable outcomes.

4.6 points

A description of the comparison information is complete and includes a sufficient amount of evidence and measurable outcomes.

5 points

A description of the comparison information is extremely thorough with substantial evidence and measurable outcomes.

Documentation of Sources

Documentation of Sources Citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.

0 points

Sources are not documented.

4 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

4.4 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

4.6 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Original Research

Original Research Original research for the PICOT-D is attached.

0 points

Original research for the PICOT-D is not attached.

4 points

4.4 points

4.6 points

5 points

Original research for the PICOT-D is attached.

Intervention

Intervention

0 points

A description of the intervention is not included.

4 points

A description of the intervention is incomplete or incorrect.

4.4 points

A description of the intervention is included but lacks a sufficient amount of evidence.

4.6 points

A description of the intervention is complete and includes a sufficient amount of evidence and is supported by literature.

5 points

A description of the intervention is extremely thorough with substantial evidence and supporting literature.

Paper Format

Paper Format Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment.

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

4 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

4.4 points

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

4.6 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

5 points

All format elements are correct.

Mechanics of Writing

Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use.

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used

2 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

2.2 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2.3 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

2.5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP-815A PICOT-D Question Submission

Grading Rubric

Performance Category	100% or highest level of performance 100% 16 points	Very good or high level of performance 88% 14 points	Acceptable level of performance 81% 13 points	Inadequate demonstration of expectations 68% 11 points	Deficient level of performance 56% 9 points	Failing level of performance 55% or less 0 points
Total Points Possible= 50	16 Points	14 Points	13 Points	11 Points	9 Points	0 Points
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
	16 Points	14 Points	13 Points	11 Points	9 Points	0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
	10 Points	9 Points			6 Points	0 Points
Interactive Dialogue Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.	Demonstrated all of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.	Demonstrated 3 of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.			Demonstrated 2 of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.	Demonstrated 1 or less of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
	8 Points	7 Points	6 Points	5 Points	4 Points	0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.	The following was present: 0-3 errors in APA format AND Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.	The following was present: 4-6 errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.	The following was present: 7-9 errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.	The following was present: 10- 12 errors in APA format AND/OR Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.	The following was present: 13 – 15 errors in APA format AND/OR Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand. AND/OR The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.	The following was present: 16 to greater errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. AND/OR Writing style does not facilitate communication
	0 Points Deducted					5 Points Lost
Participation Requirements	Demonstrated the following: Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days					Failed to demonstrate the following: Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
	0 Points Lost					5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements	Demonstrated all of the following: The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.					Demonstrates one or less of the following. The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Check Out Also: DNP-815A Midterm Conference Evaluation Individual Success Plan (ISP)