DNP-815A Case Report Application of Theory to Organizational Mission, Vision, and the Christian Worldview
DNP-815A Case Report Application of Theory to Organizational Mission, Vision, and the Christian Worldview
Case Report: Application of Theory to Organizational Mission, Vision, and the Christian Worldview
Assessment Description
For this assignment, learners explain how personal knowledge and skills gained in this course assist in solving their Direct Practice Improvement Project practice problem, and how the Christian worldview is supported within your project’s purpose and the project site’s organizational mission and vision.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
- This assignment uses a template, located in the DNP-815A folder in the DC Network, titled “Case Report: DPI Project Application of Theory to Organizational Mission and Vision, and Christian Worldviews.”
- This assignment requires that at least four scholarly, peer-reviewed, sources related to this topic with at least one in-text citation for each source.
- Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
- This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
- You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
Directions:
Construct a case report (2,000-2,250 words) using your Direct Practice Improvement (DPI) Project’s purpose, problem, and clinical questions. Apply your chosen nursing theory and evidence-based change model from the Topic 3 assignment to support your DPI Project. Your case report must include the headings provided below. Refer to the “Case Report: DPI Project Application of Theory to Organizational Mission and Vision, and Christian Worldviews” template, located in the DNP-815A folder in the DC Network, to complete your assignment. The specific criteria for this assignment are located on this template.
- Case Report Background
- Christian Worldviews
- Organization’s Mission and Vision to Theory and Model
- Pulling It Together
Portfolio Practice Immersion Hours:
It may be possible to earn portfolio practice immersion hours for this assignment. Enter the following after the References section of your paper:
Practice Immersion Hours Completion Statement DNP-815A
I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed and logged (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I also have tracked said practice immersion hours in the Lopes Activity Tracker for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice immersion preceptor/mentor before the end of the course.
Rubric Criteria
Total135 points
Criterion | 1. Unsatisfactory | 2. Less Than Satisfactory | 3. Satisfactory | 4. Good | 5. Excellent |
Paper Format
Uses of appropriate style for the major and assignment. |
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
8.64 points
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
9.5 points
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
9.94 points
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
10.8 points
All format elements are correct. |
Mechanics of Writing
Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use. |
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. |
5.4 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. |
5.94 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. |
6.21 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. |
6.75 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
Thesis Development and Purpose
Thesis Development and Purpose |
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
5.4 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. |
5.94 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
6.21 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. |
6.75 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
Research
Research |
0 points
No outside sources were used to support the assignment. |
5.4 points
Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent. |
5.94 points
Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness. |
6.21 points
Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. |
6.75 points
Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive and address all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. |
Christian Worldviews
Christian Worldviews Doctrinal statements (9), Synthesis, and Application |
0 points
The doctrinal statements are omitted. |
16.2 points
One doctrinal statement is missing; or, the doctrinal statements are incomplete overall. |
17.82 points
The doctrinal statements are presented and generally applied and synthesized. More information is needed. There are inaccuracies. |
18.63 points
The doctrinal statements are presented and adequately applied and synthesized. |
20.25 points
The doctrinal statements are clearly presented, synthesized, and applied. The narrative is insightful and well written. |
Argument Logic and Construction
Argument Logic and Construction |
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. |
5.4 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. |
5.94 points
Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. |
6.21 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. |
6.75 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
Case Report Background
Case Report Background Problem, Population |
0 points
The case report is omitted. |
10.8 points
The case report is incomplete or incorrect. |
11.88 points
The criteria for the case report are generally presented. More information is needed. There are inaccuracies. |
12.42 points
The criteria for the case report are adequately presented. Some detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. |
13.5 points
The criteria for the case report are thoroughly and accurately presented. The narrative is well-supported. |
Nursing Theory and Evidence-Based Change Model
Nursing Theory and Evidence-Based Change Model |
0 points
The selected nursing theory and evidence-based change model are not applied. |
10.8 points
The selected nursing theory and evidence-based change model are applied intermittently or incorrectly. These fail to provide support for the DPI Project. |
11.88 points
A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are generally established. Some examples are provided. More information is needed. There are inaccuracies. The purpose generally incorporates and aligns with the DPI Project. The selected nursing theory and evidence-based change model are generally applied. Some parts of the project are unsupported. |
12.42 points
The selected nursing theory and evidence-based change model are adequately applied. These provide support for the overall project. Some minor aspects of the project would benefit with further application of the selected theory or model. |
13.5 points
The selected nursing theory and evidence-based change model are applied throughout and provide clear and strong support for the DPI Project. |
Mission and Vision of Organization to Theory and Model
Mission and Vision of Organization to Theory and Model Cite Mission and Vision, Connection to Nursing Theory, Connection to Change Model |
0 points
Connection of mission and vision of the organization to theory and model is omitted. |
16.2 points
Connection of mission and vision of the organization to theory and model is incomplete. |
17.82 points
Connection of mission and vision of the organization to theory and model is outlined. More information is needed. There are inaccuracies. A general connection to nursing theory and change model is established. |
18.63 points
Connection of mission and vision of the organization to theory and model is described. Some detail is needed for clarity or support. An adequate connection to nursing theory and change model is established. |
20.25 points
Connection of mission and vision of the organization to theory and model is thoroughly described. A clear and well-supported connection to nursing theory and change model is established. |
Pulling It Together
Pulling It Together Connect and align purpose to Christian worldview, the mission and vision, and nursing theory and change model; provide examples; incorporate and align with DPI Project. |
0 points
A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are omitted. |
16.2 points
A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are incomplete. |
17.82 points
A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are generally established. Some examples are provided. More information is needed. There are inaccuracies. The purpose generally incorporates and aligns with the DPI Project. |
18.63 points
A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are established. Examples are provided. Some detail is needed for clarity or support. The purpose adequately incorporates and aligns with the DPI Project. |
20.25 points
A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are thoroughly established. Clear examples are provided. The purpose incorporates and aligns with the DPI Project. |
Documentation of Sources
Uses citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style. |
0 points
Sources are not documented. |
7.56 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. |
8.32 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. |
8.69 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. |
9.45 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |

Grading Rubric
Performance Category | 100% or highest level of performance
100% 16 points |
Very good or high level of performance
88% 14 points |
Acceptable level of performance
81% 13 points |
Inadequate demonstration of expectations
68% 11 points |
Deficient level of performance
56% 9 points
|
Failing level
of performance 55% or less 0 points |
Total Points Possible= 50 | 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points |
Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics. |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements
|
16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points | |
Application of Course Knowledge
Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements
|
10 Points | 9 Points | 6 Points | 0 Points | |||
Interactive Dialogue
Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic. |
Demonstrated all of the following:
|
Demonstrated 3 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 2 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:
|
||
8 Points | 7 Points | 6 Points | 5 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
Grammar, Syntax, APA
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error. |
The following was present:
AND
AND
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
0 Points Deducted | 5 Points Lost | |||||
Participation
Requirements |
Demonstrated the following:
|
Failed to demonstrate the following:
|
||||
0 Points Lost | 5 Points Lost | |||||
Due Date Requirements | Demonstrated all of the following:
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Demonstrates one or less of the following.
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Also Check Out: syllabus_DNP-815A MS WORD