DNP-815A Case Report Application of Theory to Organizational Mission, Vision, and the Christian Worldview

Sample Answer for DNP-815A Case Report Application of Theory to Organizational Mission, Vision, and the Christian Worldview Included After Question

Assessment Description

For this assignment, learners explain how personal knowledge and skills gained in this course assist in solving their Direct Practice Improvement Project practice problem, and how the Christian worldview is supported within your project’s purpose and the project site’s organizational mission and vision.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

This assignment uses a template, located in the DNP-815A folder in the DC Network, titled “Case Report: DPI Project Application of Theory to Organizational Mission and Vision, and Christian Worldviews.”
This assignment requires that at least four scholarly, peer-reviewed, sources related to this topic with at least one in-text citation for each source.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Directions:

Construct a case report (2,000-2,250 words) using your Direct Practice Improvement (DPI) Project’s purpose, problem, and clinical questions. Apply your chosen nursing theory and evidence-based change model from the Topic 3 assignment to support your DPI Project. Your case report must include the headings provided below. Refer to the “Case Report: DPI Project Application of Theory to Organizational Mission and Vision, and Christian Worldviews” template, located in the DNP-815A folder in the DC Network, to complete your assignment. The specific criteria for this assignment are located on this template.

Case Report Background
Christian Worldviews
Organization’s Mission and Vision to Theory and Model
Pulling It Together

Portfolio Practice Immersion Hours:

It may be possible to earn portfolio practice immersion hours for this assignment. Enter the following after the References section of your paper:

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP-815A Case Report Application of Theory to Organizational Mission, Vision, and the Christian Worldview

Practice Immersion Hours Completion Statement DNP-815A

I, (INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed and logged (NUMBER OF) clock hours in association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I also have tracked said practice immersion hours in the Lopes Activity Tracker for verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my faculty and practice immersion preceptor/mentor before the end of the course.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: DNP-815A Case Report Application of Theory to Organizational Mission, Vision, and the Christian Worldview

Title: DNP-815A Case Report Application of Theory to Organizational Mission, Vision, and the Christian Worldview

The proposed project focuses on the reduction of patient falls, focusing specifically on post-operative patients in a post-operative rehabilitation center. Traditionally, health professionals rely solely on clinical fall prevention strategies; thinking of ways of optimizing patient outcomes in this respect, it has been determined that more than traditional strategies is needed. The intention is therefore to determine whether or not combining specific patient-centered interventions with clinical fall prevention strategies succeeds in achieving significant reductions in patient falls over a two-month period.

Purpose Of Project

The purpose of this quantitative, quasi-experimental quality improvement (QI) project is to determine if the implementation of patient-centered fall interventions in rehabilitation centers for post-operative patients would impact the number of fall incidents among post-operative patients in Rehabilitation Centers in District of Columbia over four weeks.

Christian World View

Everyone has a worldview. Whether or not we realize it, we all have certain presuppositions and biases that affect the way we view all of life and reality. A worldview is like a set of lenses which taint our vision or alter the way we perceive the world around us. The Christian worldview on the other hand makes us believe that God exists (Heb. 11:6) and that He is the standard by which we measure everything else. A Christian worldview teaches us: God created everything that exists (Gen.1:1) and everything is held together by Him (Col. 1:17). (NKJV,2022)

GCU is a missional, Christ-centered university with an innovative and adaptive spirit that addresses the world’s deep needs by cultivating compassionate Christian community, empowering free and virtuous action, and serving others in ways that promote human flourishing. The doctrinal statement at GCU emphasizes on the nine believes that has been the purpose and mission value of the institution. These doctrinal statements believes the bible to be the only infallible, true and authoritative word of God. GCU expresses aspects of the Christian worldview, which affect human value and dignity, ethical decision-making, academic disciplines and vocation. “For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus.” (1 Timothy 2:5). And to crown it all it is GCU’s believe on the message of salvation as an “indictment against all forms of alienation oppression and discrimination, denouncing evil and injustice wherever it exists”

Hence for GCU, it is their mission that through academic excellence, the university equips students with knowledge of the Christian worldview, instilling a sense of purpose and vocational calling that enables students to be innovative thinkers, effective communicators, global contributors and transformative leaders who change their communities by placing the interests of others before their own.

Organization’s Mission and Vision to Theory and Model

Sibley hospital vision is to be a role model for innovation in healthcare and wellness for all. Mission is on delivering excellence and compassionate care, every person, every time. The mission of Sibley Memorial Hospital is to provide quality health services and facilities for the community, to promote wellness, to relieve suffering, and to restore health as swiftly, safely, and humanely as it can be done, consistent with the best service we can give at the highest value for all concerned (Sibley ,2021). The proposed theory is the patient centered theory and the proposed model is Lewin’s change model. Lewin’s change model supposes a change of the fall prevention paradigm. Through this change model, the idea is to move away from solely implementing fall prevention strategies, and moving towards the combination of said strategies with patient-centered interventions.

Connection Of Mission and Vision to Nursing Theory.

Patient-centered nursing theory proposes moving away from the actual disease or condition, and instead moving towards the patient as an individual or human being. This is valuable to the extent that it leads health professionals towards seeing patients, not as statistics or cases to be solved, but rather as human beings in need of comprehensive, personalized care. This humanizes the profession of nursing, and it also facilitates the establishment of rapport, trust and collaboration between nurses and patients. The mission and vision of my proposed site is aligned with the nursing theory chosen, this site relies and practices on delivering a compassionate , excellence patient centered care to each individual that walks through their door “ every patient ,every time(Sibley ,2021).

Connection Of Vision and Mission to Evidence-Based Change Model

The proposed change model is Lewin’s change model, which offers a simplified approach to change implementation. This model proposes three fundamental strategies, i.e. unfreezing, movement and refreezing. This is considered valuable for successful implementation This model, as previously mentioned, contemplates three distinct stages. The first is refreezing, which supposes disruption. It supposes creating awareness about the need for change, thereby promoting support for said change. The second stage is movement, which means deciding on how to proceed with actual implementation of the change intervention. The third and final stage, i.e. refreezing, implies assimilating and normalizing the change intervention as standard practice (Teguh et al., 2019).

The vision and mission of my DPI proposed site can be intertwined by their proposals that centers on change in an individual. They create a support and promote support through implementation of proposed change that is innovative, individualized and patientive centered.

Pulling It Together

The patient-centered nursing theory is based on human needs theory; it hinges on the nursing professional’s ability to identify the patient’s problem(s) and subsequently develop a specific typology of treatment for that patient. The process to be followed in the application of this nursing theory integrates a sequence of steps. It all starts with the nurse knowing the patient, and then sorting out the relevant, significant information (Ortiz, 2018). The process also calls for the patient and their family need to be included in treatment and the nurse needs to engage in introspection to determine their own feelings relative to the patient prior to discussing a comprehensive care plan (Eklund et al., 2019). Therefore, applying the Christian world view to this model is going to be successful as both emphasis on the human or individual been at the forefront of care. a patient centered care entails putting a patient above self, compassion care every person every time. Therefore, the proposed change model fits in with the proposed clinical question, the mission and vision of the proposed site, GCU mission and the Christian world view. The combination of these theories and views and mission statements will indeed change the direction of patient care and promote improved positive patient outcomes.

References

Eklund, J. H., Holmström, I. K., Kumlin, T., Kaminsky, E., Skoglund, K., Höglander, J., … & Meranius, M. S. (2019). “Same same or different?” A review of reviews of person-centered and patient-centered care. Patient Education and Counseling, 102(1), 3-11.

Grand Canyon University (2020) Christian identity and mission: Doctrinal statement https://www.gcu.edu/why-gcu/christian-identity-and-mission#:~:text=GCU%E2%80%99s%20Doctrinal%20Statement%20affirms%20our%20faith%20and%20beliefs,and%20identity%20into%20clear%20focus.%20Ethical%2

New King James Version Bible .Retrieved august 24^th 2022 https://www.biblegateway.com/versions/New-King-James-Version-NKJV-Bible/

Ortiz, M. R. (2018). Patient-centered care: Nursing knowledge and policy. Nursing Science Quarterly, 31(3), 291-295.

Sibley Memorial Hospital (2021) Our Mission, vision and values. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/sibley-memorial-hospital/about/index.html

Teguh, A., Hariyati, R. T. S., & Muhaeriwati, T. (2019). Applicability of Lewin’s change management model for optimization management function in nursing delegation between head nurse and team leader: A mini project in Jakarta military hospital. International Journal of Nursing and Health Services (IJNHS), 2(2), 66-74.

Rubric Criteria

Total135 points

Criterion	1. Unsatisfactory	2. Less Than Satisfactory	3. Satisfactory	4. Good	5. Excellent
Paper Format Uses of appropriate style for the major and assignment.	0 points Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	8.64 points Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	9.5 points Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	9.94 points Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	10.8 points All format elements are correct.
Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use.	0 points Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	5.4 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	5.94 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	6.21 points Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	6.75 points Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Thesis Development and Purpose Thesis Development and Purpose	0 points Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	5.4 points Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	5.94 points Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	6.21 points Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	6.75 points Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Research Research	0 points No outside sources were used to support the assignment.	5.4 points Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent.	5.94 points Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness.	6.21 points Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.	6.75 points Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive and address all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.
Christian Worldviews Christian Worldviews Doctrinal statements (9), Synthesis, and Application	0 points The doctrinal statements are omitted.	16.2 points One doctrinal statement is missing; or, the doctrinal statements are incomplete overall.	17.82 points The doctrinal statements are presented and generally applied and synthesized. More information is needed. There are inaccuracies.	18.63 points The doctrinal statements are presented and adequately applied and synthesized.	20.25 points The doctrinal statements are clearly presented, synthesized, and applied. The narrative is insightful and well written.
Argument Logic and Construction Argument Logic and Construction	0 points Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	5.4 points Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	5.94 points Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	6.21 points Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	6.75 points Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Case Report Background Case Report Background Problem, Population	0 points The case report is omitted.	10.8 points The case report is incomplete or incorrect.	11.88 points The criteria for the case report are generally presented. More information is needed. There are inaccuracies.	12.42 points The criteria for the case report are adequately presented. Some detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.	13.5 points The criteria for the case report are thoroughly and accurately presented. The narrative is well-supported.
Nursing Theory and Evidence-Based Change Model Nursing Theory and Evidence-Based Change Model	0 points The selected nursing theory and evidence-based change model are not applied.	10.8 points The selected nursing theory and evidence-based change model are applied intermittently or incorrectly. These fail to provide support for the DPI Project.	11.88 points A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are generally established. Some examples are provided. More information is needed. There are inaccuracies. The purpose generally incorporates and aligns with the DPI Project. The selected nursing theory and evidence-based change model are generally applied. Some parts of the project are unsupported.	12.42 points The selected nursing theory and evidence-based change model are adequately applied. These provide support for the overall project. Some minor aspects of the project would benefit with further application of the selected theory or model.	13.5 points The selected nursing theory and evidence-based change model are applied throughout and provide clear and strong support for the DPI Project.
Mission and Vision of Organization to Theory and Model Mission and Vision of Organization to Theory and Model Cite Mission and Vision, Connection to Nursing Theory, Connection to Change Model	0 points Connection of mission and vision of the organization to theory and model is omitted.	16.2 points Connection of mission and vision of the organization to theory and model is incomplete.	17.82 points Connection of mission and vision of the organization to theory and model is outlined. More information is needed. There are inaccuracies. A general connection to nursing theory and change model is established.	18.63 points Connection of mission and vision of the organization to theory and model is described. Some detail is needed for clarity or support. An adequate connection to nursing theory and change model is established.	20.25 points Connection of mission and vision of the organization to theory and model is thoroughly described. A clear and well-supported connection to nursing theory and change model is established.
Pulling It Together Pulling It Together Connect and align purpose to Christian worldview, the mission and vision, and nursing theory and change model; provide examples; incorporate and align with DPI Project.	0 points A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are omitted.	16.2 points A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are incomplete.	17.82 points A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are generally established. Some examples are provided. More information is needed. There are inaccuracies. The purpose generally incorporates and aligns with the DPI Project.	18.63 points A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are established. Examples are provided. Some detail is needed for clarity or support. The purpose adequately incorporates and aligns with the DPI Project.	20.25 points A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are thoroughly established. Clear examples are provided. The purpose incorporates and aligns with the DPI Project.
Documentation of Sources Uses citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.	0 points Sources are not documented.	7.56 points Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	8.32 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	8.69 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	9.45 points Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3. Satisfactory

4. Good

5. Excellent

Paper Format

Uses of appropriate style for the major and assignment.

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

8.64 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

9.5 points

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

9.94 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

10.8 points

All format elements are correct.

Mechanics of Writing

Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use.

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

5.4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

5.94 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

6.21 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

6.75 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Thesis Development and Purpose

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

5.4 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

5.94 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

6.21 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

6.75 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Research

Research

0 points

No outside sources were used to support the assignment.

5.4 points

Few outside sources were used to support the assignment. Limited research is apparent.

5.94 points

Research is adequate. Sources are standard in relevance, quality of outside sources, or timeliness.

6.21 points

Research is timely and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.

6.75 points

Research is supportive of the rationale presented. Sources are distinctive and address all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria.

Christian Worldviews

Christian Worldviews Doctrinal statements (9), Synthesis, and Application

0 points

The doctrinal statements are omitted.

16.2 points

One doctrinal statement is missing; or, the doctrinal statements are incomplete overall.

17.82 points

The doctrinal statements are presented and generally applied and synthesized. More information is needed. There are inaccuracies.

18.63 points

The doctrinal statements are presented and adequately applied and synthesized.

20.25 points

The doctrinal statements are clearly presented, synthesized, and applied. The narrative is insightful and well written.

Argument Logic and Construction

Argument Logic and Construction

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

5.4 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

5.94 points

Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

6.21 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

6.75 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Case Report Background

Case Report Background Problem, Population

0 points

The case report is omitted.

10.8 points

The case report is incomplete or incorrect.

11.88 points

The criteria for the case report are generally presented. More information is needed. There are inaccuracies.

12.42 points

The criteria for the case report are adequately presented. Some detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.

13.5 points

The criteria for the case report are thoroughly and accurately presented. The narrative is well-supported.

Nursing Theory and Evidence-Based Change Model

Nursing Theory and Evidence-Based Change Model

0 points

The selected nursing theory and evidence-based change model are not applied.

10.8 points

The selected nursing theory and evidence-based change model are applied intermittently or incorrectly. These fail to provide support for the DPI Project.

11.88 points

A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are generally established. Some examples are provided. More information is needed. There are inaccuracies. The purpose generally incorporates and aligns with the DPI Project. The selected nursing theory and evidence-based change model are generally applied. Some parts of the project are unsupported.

12.42 points

The selected nursing theory and evidence-based change model are adequately applied. These provide support for the overall project. Some minor aspects of the project would benefit with further application of the selected theory or model.

13.5 points

The selected nursing theory and evidence-based change model are applied throughout and provide clear and strong support for the DPI Project.

Mission and Vision of Organization to Theory and Model

Mission and Vision of Organization to Theory and Model Cite Mission and Vision, Connection to Nursing Theory, Connection to Change Model

0 points

Connection of mission and vision of the organization to theory and model is omitted.

16.2 points

Connection of mission and vision of the organization to theory and model is incomplete.

17.82 points

Connection of mission and vision of the organization to theory and model is outlined. More information is needed. There are inaccuracies. A general connection to nursing theory and change model is established.

18.63 points

Connection of mission and vision of the organization to theory and model is described. Some detail is needed for clarity or support. An adequate connection to nursing theory and change model is established.

20.25 points

Connection of mission and vision of the organization to theory and model is thoroughly described. A clear and well-supported connection to nursing theory and change model is established.

Pulling It Together

Pulling It Together Connect and align purpose to Christian worldview, the mission and vision, and nursing theory and change model; provide examples; incorporate and align with DPI Project.

0 points

A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are omitted.

16.2 points

A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are incomplete.

17.82 points

18.63 points

A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are established. Examples are provided. Some detail is needed for clarity or support. The purpose adequately incorporates and aligns with the DPI Project.

20.25 points

A connection and alignment of purpose to Christian worldview, mission and vision, nursing theory, and change model are thoroughly established. Clear examples are provided. The purpose incorporates and aligns with the DPI Project.

Documentation of Sources

Uses citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.

0 points

Sources are not documented.

7.56 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

8.32 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

8.69 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

9.45 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP-815A Case Report Application of Theory to Organizational Mission, Vision, and the Christian Worldview

DNP-815A Case Report Application of Theory to Organizational Mission, Vision, and the Christian Worldview

Grading Rubric

Performance Category	100% or highest level of performance 100% 16 points	Very good or high level of performance 88% 14 points	Acceptable level of performance 81% 13 points	Inadequate demonstration of expectations 68% 11 points	Deficient level of performance 56% 9 points	Failing level of performance 55% or less 0 points
Total Points Possible= 50	16 Points	14 Points	13 Points	11 Points	9 Points	0 Points
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
	16 Points	14 Points	13 Points	11 Points	9 Points	0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
	10 Points	9 Points			6 Points	0 Points
Interactive Dialogue Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.	Demonstrated all of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.	Demonstrated 3 of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.			Demonstrated 2 of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.	Demonstrated 1 or less of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
	8 Points	7 Points	6 Points	5 Points	4 Points	0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.	The following was present: 0-3 errors in APA format AND Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.	The following was present: 4-6 errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.	The following was present: 7-9 errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.	The following was present: 10- 12 errors in APA format AND/OR Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.	The following was present: 13 – 15 errors in APA format AND/OR Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand. AND/OR The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.	The following was present: 16 to greater errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. AND/OR Writing style does not facilitate communication
	0 Points Deducted					5 Points Lost
Participation Requirements	Demonstrated the following: Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days					Failed to demonstrate the following: Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
	0 Points Lost					5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements	Demonstrated all of the following: The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.					Demonstrates one or less of the following. The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

Also Check Out: syllabus_DNP-815A MS WORD