DNP-810 Post-Conference Evaluation Individual Success Plan (ISP) GCU

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP-810 Post-Conference Evaluation Individual Success Plan (ISP) GCU

Assessment Description

The Individual Success Plan (ISP) assignment in this course requires your collaboration with the course faculty early on to establish a plan for successful completion of mutually identified and agreed-upon specific deliverables for your programmatic requirements. Programmatic requirements are: (1) completion of required practice immersion hours, (2) completion of work associated with program competencies, and (3) work associated with completion of your Direct Practice Improvement (DPI) Project.

A postconference evaluation is mandatory and will occur at the end of this course and every subsequent course using the ISP form. This is intended for the learner and preceptor/mentor to review and evaluate the completion of the ISP. The faculty will validate that all areas are at “Meets Expectations” on the preceptor/mentor evaluation form, located in Typhon or Lopes Activity Tracker, prior to progression. The learner will upload the ISP and preceptor/mentor evaluations and proof of entered and approved practice immersion hours into the classroom by Topic 8 with the other required deliverables. Faculty will review this before filling out the faculty evaluation of the learner in Typhon or Lopes Activity Tracker, which the learner will also upload in Topic 8. The course faculty will complete a separate evaluation of the learner’s performance in the classroom. The faculty is responsible for any course grading, final course grade, and validation of the learner’s’ completed practice immersion hours.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment as it pertains to deliverables due in this course.

Use the Individual Success Plan (ISP) developed in Topic 1 as a personal plan for completing your practice immersion hours and how competencies will be met. All of the major milestones and deliverables should be indicated in the timeline.
While an ISP is required, unless you have a mentor, a mentor signature is not required for this course. A preconference and a postconference/evaluation between learners and preceptors/mentors are mandatory for all learners enrolled in all DNP courses (from DNP-815A on). Conferences may be conducted face-to-face or via technology. A copy of the wet-ink or digitally (digital identifier) signed document must be uploaded into the classroom no later than the end of Topic 8.
Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the LMS. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use.
Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to the beginning to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Directions:

Identify the specific deliverables you will complete throughout this course from those defined above with your faculty. Update your faculty/chair with any revisions or changes to the ISP.
List the challenges you expect to encounter as you continue the practice immersion hour and competency requirements throughout this course. How might you overcome these challenges?
Complete the Contact Information table at the beginning of the ISP resource, and type in your signature (learner only) and the date on which you completed the table. Read the information in the ISP document, including the following: Learner Expectations, Derivation of the ISP, and Instructions for Completing the ISP.

Follow the instructions and complete the ISP.

Rubric Criteria

Total20 points

Criterion	1. 1: Unsatisfactory	2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory	3. 3: Satisfactory	4. 4: Good	5. 5: Excellent
Deliverables Deliverables	0 points Description of specific deliverables to be completed in the course is not included.	2.4 points Description of specific deliverables to be completed in the course is incomplete or incorrect.	2.64 points Description of specific deliverables to be completed in the course is included but lacks sufficient detail.	2.76 points Description of specific deliverables to be completed in the course is thorough and includes sufficient detail.	3 points Description of specific deliverables to be completed in the course is complete and includes sufficient detail.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	0 points Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.	0.8 points Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	0.88 points Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	0.92 points All format elements are correct.	1 points Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	0 points Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	0.8 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	0.88 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	0.92 points Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	1 points Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Challenges Challenges	0 points Description of challenges and how to overcome them is not included.	1.6 points Description of challenges and how to overcome them is incomplete or incorrect.	1.76 points Description of challenges and how to overcome them is complete and includes sufficient detail.	1.84 points Description of challenges and how to overcome them is included but lacks sufficient detail.	2 points Description of challenges and how to overcome them is thorough and includes sufficient detail.
Self-Assessed Domains and Competencies Self-Assessed Domains and Competencies	0 points Description of self-assessed domains and competencies is not included.	1.6 points Description of self-assessed domains and competencies is incomplete or incorrect.	1.76 points Description of self-assessed domains and competencies is complete and includes sufficient detail.	1.84 points Description of self-assessed domains and competencies is included but lacks sufficient detail.	2 points Description of self-assessed domains and competencies is thorough and includes sufficient detail.
Practice Immersion Hours Practice Immersion Hours	0 points N/A	1.6 points No practice immersion hours are indicated.	1.76 points No practice immersion hours are indicated.	1.84 points N/A	2 points Practice immersion hours reflect described assignment or project.
Mentor Signature Mentor Signature	0 points N/A	1.6 points No wet or digital signature is present	1.76 points N/A	1.84 points N/A	2 points Wet or digital signature is present
DPI Project Milestones DPI Project Milestones	0 points Description of DPI project milestones to be achieved in the course is not included.	1.6 points Description of DPI project milestones to be achieved in the course is included but lacks sufficient detail.	1.76 points Description of DPI project milestones to be achieved in the course is incomplete or incorrect.	1.84 points Description of DPI project milestones to be achieved in the course is complete and includes sufficient detail.	2 points Description of DPI project milestones to be achieved in the course is thorough and includes sufficient detail.
Remaining Deliverables Remaining Deliverables	0 points Description of remaining deliverables to complete is not included.	2.4 points Description of remaining deliverables is included but lacks sufficient detail.	2.64 points Description of remaining deliverables to complete is incomplete or incorrect.	2.76 points Description of remaining deliverables to complete is complete and includes sufficient detail.	3 points Description of remaining deliverables to complete is thorough and includes sufficient detail.
Plan for Practice Experiences Plan for Practice Experiences	0 points Plan for practice experiences to be completed in the course is incomplete or incorrect.	1.6 points Plan for practice experiences to be completed in the course is included but lacks sufficient detail.	1.76 points Plan for practice experiences to be completed in the course is not included.	1.84 points Plan for practice experiences to be completed in the course is complete and includes sufficient detail.	2 points Plan for practice experiences to be completed in the course is thorough and includes sufficient detail.

Criterion

1. 1: Unsatisfactory

2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory

3. 3: Satisfactory

4. 4: Good

5. 5: Excellent

Deliverables

Deliverables

0 points

Description of specific deliverables to be completed in the course is not included.

2.4 points

Description of specific deliverables to be completed in the course is incomplete or incorrect.

2.64 points

Description of specific deliverables to be completed in the course is included but lacks sufficient detail.

2.76 points

Description of specific deliverables to be completed in the course is thorough and includes sufficient detail.

3 points

Description of specific deliverables to be completed in the course is complete and includes sufficient detail.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

0 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

0.8 points

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

0.88 points

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

0.92 points

All format elements are correct.

1 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

0.8 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

0.88 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

0.92 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

1 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Challenges

Challenges

0 points

Description of challenges and how to overcome them is not included.

1.6 points

Description of challenges and how to overcome them is incomplete or incorrect.

1.76 points

Description of challenges and how to overcome them is complete and includes sufficient detail.

1.84 points

Description of challenges and how to overcome them is included but lacks sufficient detail.

2 points

Description of challenges and how to overcome them is thorough and includes sufficient detail.

Self-Assessed Domains and Competencies

Self-Assessed Domains and Competencies

0 points

Description of self-assessed domains and competencies is not included.

1.6 points

Description of self-assessed domains and competencies is incomplete or incorrect.

1.76 points

Description of self-assessed domains and competencies is complete and includes sufficient detail.

1.84 points

Description of self-assessed domains and competencies is included but lacks sufficient detail.

2 points

Description of self-assessed domains and competencies is thorough and includes sufficient detail.

Practice Immersion Hours

Practice Immersion Hours

0 points

N/A

1.6 points

No practice immersion hours are indicated.

1.76 points

No practice immersion hours are indicated.

1.84 points

N/A

2 points

Practice immersion hours reflect described assignment or project.

Mentor Signature

Mentor Signature

0 points

N/A

1.6 points

No wet or digital signature is present

1.76 points

N/A

1.84 points

N/A

2 points

Wet or digital signature is present

DPI Project Milestones

DPI Project Milestones

0 points

Description of DPI project milestones to be achieved in the course is not included.

1.6 points

Description of DPI project milestones to be achieved in the course is included but lacks sufficient detail.

1.76 points

Description of DPI project milestones to be achieved in the course is incomplete or incorrect.

1.84 points

Description of DPI project milestones to be achieved in the course is complete and includes sufficient detail.

2 points

Description of DPI project milestones to be achieved in the course is thorough and includes sufficient detail.

Remaining Deliverables

Remaining Deliverables

0 points

Description of remaining deliverables to complete is not included.

2.4 points

Description of remaining deliverables is included but lacks sufficient detail.

2.64 points

Description of remaining deliverables to complete is incomplete or incorrect.

2.76 points

Description of remaining deliverables to complete is complete and includes sufficient detail.

3 points

Description of remaining deliverables to complete is thorough and includes sufficient detail.

Plan for Practice Experiences

Plan for Practice Experiences

0 points

Plan for practice experiences to be completed in the course is incomplete or incorrect.

1.6 points

Plan for practice experiences to be completed in the course is included but lacks sufficient detail.

1.76 points

Plan for practice experiences to be completed in the course is not included.

1.84 points

Plan for practice experiences to be completed in the course is complete and includes sufficient detail.

2 points

Plan for practice experiences to be completed in the course is thorough and includes sufficient detail.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP-810 Post-Conference Evaluation Individual Success Plan (ISP) GCU

DNP-810 Post-Conference Evaluation Individual Success Plan (ISP) GCU

Grading Rubric

Performance Category	100% or highest level of performance 100% 16 points	Very good or high level of performance 88% 14 points	Acceptable level of performance 81% 13 points	Inadequate demonstration of expectations 68% 11 points	Deficient level of performance 56% 9 points	Failing level of performance 55% or less 0 points
Total Points Possible= 50	16 Points	14 Points	13 Points	11 Points	9 Points	0 Points
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
	16 Points	14 Points	13 Points	11 Points	9 Points	0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
	10 Points	9 Points			6 Points	0 Points
Interactive Dialogue Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.	Demonstrated all of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.	Demonstrated 3 of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.			Demonstrated 2 of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.	Demonstrated 1 or less of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
	8 Points	7 Points	6 Points	5 Points	4 Points	0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.	The following was present: 0-3 errors in APA format AND Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.	The following was present: 4-6 errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.	The following was present: 7-9 errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.	The following was present: 10- 12 errors in APA format AND/OR Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.	The following was present: 13 – 15 errors in APA format AND/OR Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand. AND/OR The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.	The following was present: 16 to greater errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. AND/OR Writing style does not facilitate communication
	0 Points Deducted					5 Points Lost
Participation Requirements	Demonstrated the following: Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days					Failed to demonstrate the following: Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
	0 Points Lost					5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements	Demonstrated all of the following: The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.					Demonstrates one or less of the following. The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.