Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

DNP 805 Week 8 Evaluation of Health Care Technology GCU

DNP 805 Week 8 Evaluation of Health Care Technology GCU

Assessment Description

For this assignment, you will utilize content from the study materials as well as additional qualified resources to synthesize new information that you can apply towards your DPI Project, your future work area, or your clinical practice as a DNP-prepared nurse.

General Guidelines:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  • Use primary sources published within the last 5 years. Provide citations and references for all sources used.
  • You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
  • Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the learning management system. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use.

Directions:

For this assignment, write a 1,000-1,250 word paper in which you:

  1. Select a technology that has been explored in the course.
  2. Using the technology you have selected, define and describe how the element would be measured or evaluated.
  3. Using the content in the textbook and other readings, list three elements that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface.
  4. Perform an assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factors methods to determine functionality.
  5. For each element, propose practicable suggestions for improvement using support from the literature.
  6. Evaluation of Health Care Technology – Rubric
  7. Collapse All Evaluation Of Health Care Technology – RubricCollapse All
  8. Selection of a Specific Technology Explored in This Course
  9. 11 points
  10. Criteria Description
  11. Selection of a Specific Technology Explored in This Course
  12. Excellent
  13. 11 points
  14. Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is present. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
  15. Good
  16. 12 points
  17. Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is present. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
  18. Satisfactory
  19. 68 points
  20. Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is perfunctory.
  21. Less Than Satisfactory
  22. 8 points
  23. Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is marginal or incomplete.
  24. Unsatisfactory
  25. 0 points
  26. Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is not present.
  27. Assessment Performed Using Elements of User-Technology Interface or Human Factor Methods to Determin
  28. 5 points
  29. Criteria Description
  30. Assessment Performed Using Elements of User-Technology Interface or Human Factor Methods to Determine Existing Functionality of the Specified Technology
  31. Excellent
  32. 5 points
  33. An assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factor methods to determine existing functionality of the specified technology is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
  34. Good
  35. 18 points
  36. An assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factor methods to determine existing functionality of the specified technology is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
  37. Satisfactory
  38. 52 points
  39. An assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factor methods to determine existing functionality of the specified technology is present but at a perfunctory level.
  40. Less Than Satisfactory
  41. 2 points
  42. An assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factor methods to determine existing functionality of the specified technology is marginal or incomplete.
  43. Unsatisfactory
  44. 0 points
  45. An assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factor methods to determine existing functionality of the specified technology is not present.
  46. List With Support for Three Elements of the Specified Technology That Will Be Used to Evaluate the U
  47. 5 points
  48. Criteria Description
  49. List With Support for Three Elements of the Specified Technology That Will Be Used to Evaluate the User-Technology Interface Using the Course Content
  50. Excellent
  51. 5 points
  52. A list with support of three elements of the specified technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface using the course content is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
  53. Good
  54. 18 points
  55. A list with support of three elements of the specified technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface using the course content is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
    DNP 805 Week 8 Evaluation of Health Care Technology GCU

    DNP 805 Week 8 Evaluation of Health Care Technology GCU

    Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:DNP 805 Week 8 Evaluation of Health Care Technology GCU

  56. Satisfactory
  57. 52 points
  58. A list with support of three elements of the specified technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface using the course content is present but at a perfunctory level.
  59. Less Than Satisfactory
  60. 2 points
  61. A list with support of three elements of the specified technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface using the course content is present but is marginal or incomplete.
  62. Unsatisfactory
  63. 0 points
  64. A list with support of three elements of the specified technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface using the course content is not present.
  65. Definition of Each Element of the Specified Technology Identified and Description of How Each Elemen
  66. 5 points
  67. Criteria Description
  68. Definition of Each Element of the Specified Technology Identified and Description of How Each Element Would Be Measured or Evaluated
  69. Excellent
  70. 5 points
  71. A definition of each element of the specified technology identified and a description of how each element would be measured or evaluated are present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
  72. Good
  73. 18 points
  74. A definition of each element of the specified technology identified and a description of how each element would be measured or evaluated are present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
  75. Satisfactory
  76. 52 points
  77. A definition of each element of the specified technology identified and a description of how each element would be measured or evaluated are present but at a perfunctory level.
  78. Less Than Satisfactory
  79. 2 points
  80. A definition of each element of the specified technology identified and a description of how each element would be measured or evaluated are present but are marginal or incomplete.
  81. Unsatisfactory
  82. 0 points
  83. A definition of each element of the specified technology identified and a description of how each element would be measured or evaluated are not present.
  84. Proposal That Employs Support From the Literature to Provide Practicable Suggestions for Improvement
  85. 5 points
  86. Criteria Description
  87. Proposal That Employs Support From the Literature to Provide Practicable Suggestions for Improvement in the Use of Each Element of the Specified Technology
  88. Excellent
  89. 5 points
  90. A proposal that employs support from the literature to provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use of each element of the specified technology is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
  91. Good
  92. 18 points
  93. A proposal that employs support from the literature to provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use of each element of the specified technology is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
  94. Satisfactory
  95. 52 points
  96. A proposal that employs support from the literature to provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use of each element of the specified technology is present but at a perfunctory level.
  97. Less Than Satisfactory
  98. 2 points
  99. A proposal that employs support from the literature to provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use of each element of the specified technology is present but is marginal or incomplete.
  • Unsatisfactory
  1. 0 points
  2. A proposal that employs support from the literature to provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use of each element of the specified technology is not present.
  3. Purpose
  4. 7 points
  5. Criteria Description
  6. Purpose
  • Excellent
  1. 7 points
  2. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
  • Good
  1. 08 points
  2. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
  • Satisfactory
  1. 78 points
  2. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
  • Less Than Satisfactory
  1. 16 points
  2. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
  • Unsatisfactory
  1. 0 points
  2. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
  3. Argument Logic and Construction
  4. 8 points
  5. Criteria Description
  6. Argument Logic and Construction
  • Excellent
  1. 8 points
  2. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
  • Good
  1. 1 points
  2. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
  • Satisfactory
  1. 74 points
  2. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
  • Less Than Satisfactory
  1. 04 points
  2. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
  • Unsatisfactory
  1. 0 points
  2. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
  3. Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
  4. 5 points
  5. Criteria Description
  6. Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
  • Excellent
  1. 5 points
  2. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
  • Good
  1. 06 points
  2. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
  • Satisfactory
  1. 84 points
  2. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
  • Less Than Satisfactory
  1. 4 points
  2. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
  • Unsatisfactory
  1. 0 points
  2. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
  3. Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
  4. 5 points
  5. Criteria Description
  6. Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
  • Excellent
  1. 5 points
  2. All format elements are correct.
  • Good
  1. 06 points
  2. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
  • Satisfactory
  1. 84 points
  2. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
  • Less Than Satisfactory
  1. 4 points
  2. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
  • Unsatisfactory
  1. 0 points
  2. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
  3. Documentation of Sources
  4. 5 points
  5. Criteria Description
  6. Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
  • Excellent
  1. 5 points
  2. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
  • Good
  1. 06 points
  2. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
  • Satisfactory
  1. 84 points
  2. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
  • Less Than Satisfactory
  1. 4 points
  2. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
  • Unsatisfactory
  1. 0 points
  2. Sources are not documented.
  3. Total 110 points
Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.