Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

DNP 805 Topic 6 Discussion 1 A patient of your choice is being discharged to home and will use telehealth technology. Post the technology your patient will use at home and how will you connect with the patient using this technology.

DNP 805 Topic 6 Discussion 1 A patient of your choice is being discharged to home and will use telehealth technology. Post the technology your patient will use at home and how will you connect with the patient using this technology.

A patient of your choice is being discharged to home and will use telehealth technology. Post the technology your patient will use at home and how will you connect with the patient using this technology.

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation

Hi Class,

Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.

Contact me if you have any questions.

Important information on Writing a Discussion Question

  • Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
  • There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
  • Include in-text citations in your response
  • Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
  • Follow APA-7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor

  • Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.Exit Grid View
     List View
    Excellent
    Point range: 90–100

    Good
    Point range: 80–89

    Fair
    Point range: 70–79

    Poor
    Point range: 0–69

    Introduction to the case (1
    page)
    Briefly explain and summarize
    the case for this Assignment.
    Be sure to include the specific
    patient factors that may impact
    your decision making when

    prescribing medication for this
    patient.

    9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
    The response accurately, clearly,
    and fully summarizes in detail the
    case for the Assignment.
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail the
    specific patient factors that
    impact decision making when
    prescribing medication for this
    patient.

    8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
    The response accurately
    summarizes the case for the
    Assignment.
    The response accurately explains
    the specific patient factors that
    impact decision making with
    prescribing medication for this
    patient.

    7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely summarizes the case for
    the Assignment.
    The response inaccurately or

    vaguely explains the specific
    patient factors that impact
    decision making with prescribing
    medication for this patient.

    0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely summarizes the case for
    the Assignment, or is missing.
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains the specific
    patient factors that impact
    decision making with prescribing
    medication for this patient.

    Decision #1 (1–2 pages)
    • Which decision did you
    select?
    • Why did you select this
    decision? Be specific and
    support your response with
    clinically relevant and patient-
    specific resources, including
    the primary literature.
    • Why did you not select the

    18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail the

    decision selected.
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail why the
    decision was selected, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that fully support the
    decision selected.

    16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
    The response accurately explains
    the decision selected.
    The response explains why the
    decision was selected, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that support the
    decision selected.
    The response accurately explains

    14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains the decision
    selected.
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains why the
    decision was selected, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that inaccurately or
    vaguely support the decision

    0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains the decision
    selected.
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains why the
    decision was selected, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that do not support the
    decision selected, or is missing.

    other two options provided in
    the exercise? Be specific and
    support your response with
    clinically relevant and patient-
    specific resources, including
    the primary literature.
    • What were you hoping to
    achieve by making this
    decision? Support your
    response with evidence and
    references to the Learning
    Resources (including the
    primary literature).
    • Explain how ethical
    considerations may impact
    your treatment plan and
    communication with patients.
    Be specific and provide

    examples.

    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail why the
    other two responses were not
    selected, with specific clinically
    relevant resources that fully
    support the response.
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail the
    outcome the student was hoping
    to achieve with the selected
    decision, with specific clinically
    relevant resources that fully
    support the response.
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail how
    ethical considerations impact the
    treatment plan and
    communication with patients.
    Examples provided fully support
    the decisions and responses
    provided.

    why the other two responses
    were not selected, with specific
    clinically relevant resources that
    support the response.
    The response accurately explains

    the outcome the student was
    hoping to achieve with the
    selected decision, with specific
    clinically relevant resources that
    support the response.
    The response accurately explains
    how ethical considerations
    impact the treatment plan and
    communication with patients.
    Examples provided support the
    decisions and responses
    provided.

    selected.
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains why the other
    two responses were not selected,
    with specific clinically relevant
    resources that inaccurately or
    vaguely support the response.
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains the outcome the
    student was hoping to achieve
    with the selected decision, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that inaccurately or
    vaguely support the response.
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains how ethical

    considerations impact the
    treatment plan and
    communication with patients.
    Examples provided may support
    the decisions and responses
    provided.

    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains why the other
    two responses were not selected,
    with specific clinically relevant
    resources that do not support the
    decision selected, or is missing.
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains the outcome the
    student was hoping to achieve
    with the selected decision, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that do not support the
    response, or is missing.
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains how ethical
    considerations impact the
    treatment plan and
    communication with patients, or
    is missing.
    Examples provided do not
    support the decisions and
    responses provided, or is

    missing.

    Decision #2 (1–2 pages)
    • Which decision did you
    select?
    • Why did you select this
    decision? Be specific and
    support your response with
    clinically relevant and patient-
    specific resources, including
    the primary literature.
    • Why did you not select the
    other two options provided in
    the exercise? Be specific and
    support your response with
    clinically relevant and patient-
    specific resources, including
    the primary literature.
    • What were you hoping to

    18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail the
    decision selected.
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail why the
    decision was selected, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that fully support the

    decision selected.
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail why the
    other two responses were not
    selected, with specific clinically
    relevant resources that fully
    support the response.

    16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
    The response accurately explains
    the decision selected.
    The response explains why the
    decision was selected, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that support the
    decision selected.
    The response accurately explains
    why the other two responses
    were not selected, with specific
    clinically relevant resources that
    support the response.
    The response accurately explains
    the outcome the student was

    14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains the decision
    selected.
    The response inaccurately or

    vaguely explains why the
    decision was selected, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that inaccurately or
    vaguely support the decision
    selected.
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains why the other
    two responses were not selected,
    with specific clinically relevant
    resources that inaccurately or

    0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains in detail the
    decision selected.
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains why the
    decision was selected, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that do not support the
    decision selected, or is missing.
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains why the other
    two responses were not selected,
    with specific clinically relevant
    resources that do not support the
    decision selected, or is missing.

    achieve by making this
    decision? Support your
    response with evidence and
    references to the Learning
    Resources (including the
    primary literature).
    • Explain how ethical
    considerations may impact
    your treatment plan and
    communication with patients.
    Be specific and provide
    examples.

    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail the
    outcome the student was hoping
    to achieve with the selected
    decision, with specific clinically
    relevant resources that fully
    support the response.
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail how
    ethical considerations impact the
    treatment plan and
    communication with patients.
    Examples provided fully support
    the decisions and responses
    provided.

    hoping to achieve with the
    selected decision, with specific
    clinically relevant resources that
    support the response.
    The response accurately explains
    how ethical considerations
    impact the treatment plan and
    communication with patients.
    Examples provided support the
    decisions and responses
    provided.

    vaguely support the response.
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains the outcome the
    student was hoping to achieve
    with the selected decision, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that inaccurately or
    vaguely support the response.
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains how ethical
    considerations impact the
    treatment plan and
    communication with patients.
    Examples provided may support
    the decisions and responses
    provided.

    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains the outcome the
    student was hoping to achieve
    with the selected decision, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that do not support the
    response, or is missing.
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains how ethical
    considerations impact the
    treatment plan and
    communication with patients, or
    is missing.
    Examples provided do not
    support the decisions and
    responses provided, or is
    missing.

    Decision #3 (1–2 pages)
    • Which decision did you
    select?
    • Why did you select this
    decision? Be specific and
    support your response with
    clinically relevant and patient-
    specific resources, including
    the primary literature.
    • Why did you not select the
    other two options provided in

    the exercise? Be specific and
    support your response with
    clinically relevant and patient-
    specific resources, including
    the primary literature.
    • What were you hoping to
    achieve by making this
    decision? Support your
    response with evidence and
    references to the Learning
    Resources (including the
    primary literature).
    • Explain how ethical

    18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail the
    decision selected.
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail why the
    decision was selected, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that fully support the
    decision selected.
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail why the
    other two responses were not
    selected, with specific clinically
    relevant resources that fully

    support the response.
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail the
    outcome the student was hoping
    to achieve with the selected
    decision, with specific clinically
    relevant resources that fully

    16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
    The response accurately explains
    the decision selected.
    The response explains why the
    decision was selected, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that support the
    decision selected.
    The response accurately explains
    why the other two responses
    were not selected, with specific
    clinically relevant resources that
    support the response.
    The response accurately explains
    the outcome the student was
    hoping to achieve with the
    selected decision, with specific
    clinically relevant resources that
    support the response.
    The response accurately explains
    how ethical considerations

    14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains the decision
    selected.
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains why the
    decision was selected, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that inaccurately or
    vaguely support the decision
    selected.
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains why the other
    two responses were not selected,
    with specific clinically relevant
    resources that inaccurately or
    vaguely support the response.
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains the outcome the
    student was hoping to achieve
    with the selected decision, with
    specific clinically relevant

    0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains in detail the
    decision selected.
    The response inaccurately and

    vaguely explains why the
    decision was selected, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that do not support the
    decision selected, or is missing.
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains why the other
    two responses were not selected,
    with specific clinically relevant
    resources that do not support the
    decision selected, or is missing.
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains the outcome the
    student was hoping to achieve
    with the selected decision, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that do not support the

    considerations may impact
    your treatment plan and
    communication with patients.
    Be specific and provide
    examples.

    support the response.
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail how
    ethical considerations impact the
    treatment plan and

    communication with patients.
    Examples provided fully support
    the decisions and responses
    provided.

    impact the treatment plan and
    communication with patients.
    Examples provided support the
    decisions and responses
    provided.

    resources that inaccurately or
    vaguely support the response.
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains how ethical
    considerations impact the
    treatment plan and
    communication with patients.
    Examples provided may support
    the decisions and responses
    provided.

    response, or is missing.
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains how ethical
    considerations impact the
    treatment plan and
    communication with patients, or
    is missing.

    Examples provided do not
    support the decisions and
    responses provided, or is
    missing.

    Conclusion (1 page)
    • Summarize your
    recommendations on the
    treatment options you selected
    for this patient. Be sure to
    justify your recommendations
    and support your response
    with clinically relevant and
    patient-specific resources,
    including the primary literature.

    14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
    The response accurately and
    clearly summarizes in detail the
    recommendations on the
    treatment options selected for
    this patient.
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains a justification for
    the recommendations provided,
    including clinically relevant
    resources that fully support the
    recommendations provided.

    12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
    The response accurately
    summarizes the
    recommendations on the
    treatment options selected for
    this patient.
    The response accurately explains
    a justification for the
    recommendation provided,
    including clinically relevant
    resources that support the
    recommendations provided.

    11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely summarizes the
    recommendations on the
    treatment options selected for
    this patient.
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains a justification for
    the recommendations provided,
    including clinically relevant
    resources that inaccurately or
    vaguely support the
    recommendations provided.

    0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
    The response inaccurately and

    vaguely summarizes the
    recommendations on the
    treatment options selected for
    this patient, or is missing.
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains a justification for
    the recommendations provided,
    including clinically relevant
    resources that do not support the
    recommendations provided, or is
    missing.

    Written Expression and
    Formatting – Paragraph
    Development and Organization:
    Paragraphs make clear points
    that support well-developed
    ideas, flow logically, and
    demonstrate continuity of
    ideas. Sentences are carefully
    focused—neither long and
    rambling nor short and lacking
    substance. A clear and
    comprehensive purpose
    statement and introduction are
    provided that delineate all
    required criteria.

    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow
    writing standards for flow,
    continuity, and clarity.
    A clear and comprehensive
    purpose statement, introduction,
    and conclusion are provided that
    delineate all required criteria.

    4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
    Paragraphs and sentences follow
    writing standards for flow,
    continuity, and clarity 80% of the
    time.
    Purpose, introduction, and
    conclusion of the assignment are
    stated, yet they are brief and not
    descriptive.

    3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
    Paragraphs and sentences follow
    writing standards for flow,
    continuity, and clarity 60%–79%
    of the time.
    Purpose, introduction, and
    conclusion of the assignment is
    vague or off topic.

    0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
    Paragraphs and sentences follow

    writing standards for flow,
    continuity, and clarity < 60% of
    the time.
    No purpose statement,
    introduction, or conclusion were
    provided.

    Written Expression and
    Formatting – English writing
    standards:
    Correct grammar, mechanics,
    and proper punctuation

    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
    Uses correct grammar, spelling,
    and punctuation with no errors.

    4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
    Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar,
    spelling, and punctuation errors.

    3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
    Contains several (3 or 4)
    grammar, spelling, and
    punctuation errors.

    0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
    Contains many (≥ 5) grammar,
    spelling, and punctuation errors

    that interfere with the reader’s
    understanding.

    Written Expression and
    Formatting – The paper follows
    correct APA format for title
    page, headings, font,
    spacing, margins, indentations,
    page numbers, parenthetical/in-
    text citations, and reference
    list.

    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
    Uses correct APA format with no
    errors.

    4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
    Contains a few (1 or 2) APA
    format errors.

    3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
    Contains several (3 or 4) APA
    format errors.

    0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
    Contains many (≥ 5) APA format
    errors.

    Total Points: 100

  • Here are some helpful links
  • Student paper example
  • Citing Sources
  • The Writing Center is a great resource

Welcome to class

Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to.

I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.

Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.

If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.

Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.

Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.

I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.