DNP 805 Topic 3 Using CPOE and CDSS Essay
DNP 805 Topic 3 Using CPOE and CDSS Essay
Assessment Description
For this assignment, select one clinical practice issue that involves a specific medication. Using a Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) system, design a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) that would be embedded in the EHR at your site of practice. Your CDSS must connect with CPOE to include a medication. You must link these two applications within the design.
General Guidelines:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
- This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
- Use primary sources published within the last 5 years. Provide citations and references for all sources used.
- Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
- You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
- Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the learning management system. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use.
Directions:
Write a 1,000-1,250 word paper that provides the following:
- Specific details of the clinical issue involving a specific medication
- The rationale behind your design development.
- A description of how this CDSS will be implemented and adopted by fellow clinicians.
- An assessment of challenges and proposed solutions which might apply to this scenario (e.g., information loss, communication breakdown).
Using CPOE and CDSS – Rubric
Collapse All Using CPOE And CDSS – RubricCollapse All
Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) Used to Design a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS)Com
15 points
Criteria Description
Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) Used to Design a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS)
- Excellent
15 points
CPOE is used to design a CDSS in full. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
- Good
13.8 points
CPOE is used to design a CDSS in full. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
- Satisfactory
13.2 points
CPOE is used to design a CDSS but used at a perfunctory level.
- Less Than Satisfactory
12 points
CPOE is used to design a CDSS but use is marginal or incomplete.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
CPOE is not used to design a CDSS.
Proposed CDSS Embedded in the EHR
15 points
Criteria Description
Proposed CDSS Embedded in the EHR
- Excellent
15 points
Proposed CDSS is embedded in the EHR in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
- Good
13.8 points
Proposed CDSS is embedded in the EHR in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
- Satisfactory
13.2 points
Proposed CDSS is embedded in the EHR but at a perfunctory level.
- Less Than Satisfactory
12 points
Proposed CDSS is embedded in the EHR but use is marginal or incomplete.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Proposed CDSS is not embedded in the EHR.
Proposed CDSS Design Links a Specific Medication Through the CPOE
5 points
Criteria Description
Proposed CDSS Design Links a Specific Medication Through the CPOE
- Excellent
5 points
Proposed CDSS design links a specific medication through the CPOE in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
- Good
4.6 points
Proposed CDSS design links a specific medication through the CPOE in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
- Satisfactory
4.4 points
Proposed CDSS design links a specific medication through the CPOE but at a perfunctory level.
- Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Proposed CDSS design links a specific medication through the CPOE but effort is marginal or incomplete.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Proposed CDSS design does not link a specific medication through the CPOE.
Discussion of Specific Details of Clinical Issue Involving the Selected Medication
5 points
Criteria Description
Discussion of Specific Details of Clinical Issue Involving the Selected Medication
- Excellent
5 points
Discussion of specific details of the clinical issue involving the selected medication is convincing and thorough. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
- Good
4.6 points
Discussion of specific details of the clinical issue involving the selected medication is convincing and thorough. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
- Satisfactory
4.4 points
Discussion of specific details of the clinical issue involving the selected medication is present but rendered at a perfunctory level.
- Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Discussion of specific details of the clinical issue involving the selected medication is present but incomplete.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Discussion of specific details of the clinical issue involving the selected medication is not present.
Discussion of the Rationale Behind the Design Development
5 points
Criteria Description
Discussion of the Rationale Behind the Design Development
- Excellent
5 points
A discussion of the rationale behind the design development is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
- Good
4.6 points
A discussion of the rationale behind the design development is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
- Satisfactory
4.4 points
A discussion of the rationale behind the design development is present but rendered at a perfunctory level.
- Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
A discussion of the rationale behind the design development is present but incomplete.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
A discussion of the rationale behind the design development is not present.
Description of How Proposed CDSS Will Be Implemented and Adopted by Fellow Clinicians
10 points
Criteria Description

DNP 805 Topic 3 Using CPOE and CDSS Essay
Description of How Proposed CDSS Will Be Implemented and Adopted by Fellow Clinicians
- Excellent
10 points
A description of how the proposed CDSS will be implemented and adopted by fellow clinicians is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
- Good
9.2 points
A description of how the proposed CDSS will be implemented and adopted by fellow clinicians is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
- Satisfactory
8.8 points
A description of how the proposed CDSS will be implemented and adopted by fellow clinicians is present but rendered at a perfunctory level.
- Less Than Satisfactory
8 points
A description of how the proposed CDSS will be implemented and adopted by fellow clinicians is present but incomplete.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of how the proposed CDSS will be implemented and adopted by fellow clinicians is not provided.
Explanation of How Patient Outcomes Will Be Measured
5 points
Criteria Description
Explanation of How Patient Outcomes Will Be Measured
- Excellent
5 points
An explanation of how patient outcomes will be measured is provided in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
- Good
4.6 points
An explanation of how patient outcomes will be measured is provided in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
- Satisfactory
4.4 points
An explanation of how patient outcomes will be measured is provided at a perfunctory level.
- Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
An explanation of how patient outcomes will be measured is provided but explanation is incomplete.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
An explanation of how patient outcomes will be measured is not provided.
Assessment of Challenges and Proposed Solutions Which Might Apply to Scenario
10 points
Criteria Description
Assessment of Challenges and Proposed Solutions Which Might Apply to Scenario
- Excellent
10 points
An assessment of challenges and proposed solutions which might apply to this scenario is clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is insightful, forward-thinking, and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
- Good
9.2 points
An assessment of challenges and proposed solutions which might apply to this scenario is clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
- Satisfactory
8.8 points
An assessment of challenges and proposed solutions which might apply to this scenario is provided, but the assessment is rendered at a perfunctory level.
- Less Than Satisfactory
8 points
An assessment of challenges and proposed solutions which might apply to this scenario is provided, but elements are missing or incomplete.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
An assessment of challenges and proposed solutions which might apply to this scenario is not provided.
Thesis Development and Purpose
7 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
- Excellent
7 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
- Good
6.44 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
- Satisfactory
6.16 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
- Less Than Satisfactory
5.6 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Argument Logic and Construction
8 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
- Excellent
8 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
- Good
7.36 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
- Satisfactory
7.04 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
- Less Than Satisfactory
6.4 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
- Excellent
5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
- Good
4.6 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
- Satisfactory
4.4 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
- Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
- Excellent
5 points
All format elements are correct.
- Good
4.6 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
- Satisfactory
4.4 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
- Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources
5 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
- Excellent
5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
- Good
4.6 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
- Satisfactory
4.4 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
- Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
Total 100 points
Welcome to class
Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to.
I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.
Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.
If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.
Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.
Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.
I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!
Sincerely,
Rubric Criteria
Criterion |
1. Unsatisfactory |
2. Less Than Satisfactory |
3. Satisfactory |
4. Good |
5. Excellent |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assessment of Challenges and Proposed Solutions Which Might Apply to Scenario Assessment of Challenges and Proposed Solutions Which Might Apply to Scenario |
0 points An assessment of challenges and proposed solutions which might apply to this scenario is not provided. |
8 points An assessment of challenges and proposed solutions which might apply to this scenario is provided, but elements are missing or incomplete. |
8.8 points An assessment of challenges and proposed solutions which might apply to this scenario is provided, but the assessment is rendered at a perfunctory level. |
9.2 points An assessment of challenges and proposed solutions which might apply to this scenario is clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
10 points An assessment of challenges and proposed solutions which might apply to this scenario is clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is insightful, forward-thinking, and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
Thesis Development and Purpose Thesis Development and Purpose |
0 points Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. |
5.6 points Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. |
6.16 points Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. |
6.44 points Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. |
7 points Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
Argument Logic and Construction Argument Logic and Construction |
0 points Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. |
6.4 points Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. |
7.04 points Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. |
7.36 points Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. |
8 points Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. |
Explanation of How Patient Outcomes Will Be Measured Explanation of How Patient Outcomes Will Be Measured |
0 points An explanation of how patient outcomes will be measured is not provided. |
4 points An explanation of how patient outcomes will be measured is provided but explanation is incomplete. |
4.4 points An explanation of how patient outcomes will be measured is provided at a perfunctory level. |
4.6 points An explanation of how patient outcomes will be measured is provided in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
5 points An explanation of how patient outcomes will be measured is provided in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
Proposed CDSS Embedded in the EHR Proposed CDSS Embedded in the EHR |
0 points Proposed CDSS is not embedded in the EHR. |
12 points Proposed CDSS is embedded in the EHR but use is marginal or incomplete. |
13.2 points Proposed CDSS is embedded in the EHR but at a perfunctory level. |
13.8 points Proposed CDSS is embedded in the EHR in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
15 points Proposed CDSS is embedded in the EHR in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) |
0 points Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. |
4 points Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. |
4.4 points Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. |
4.6 points Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. |
5 points All format elements are correct. |
Proposed CDSS Design Links a Specific Medication Through the CPOE Proposed CDSS Design Links a Specific Medication Through the CPOE |
0 points Proposed CDSS design does not link a specific medication through the CPOE. |
4 points Proposed CDSS design links a specific medication through the CPOE but effort is marginal or incomplete. |
4.4 points Proposed CDSS design links a specific medication through the CPOE but at a perfunctory level. |
4.6 points Proposed CDSS design links a specific medication through the CPOE in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
5 points Proposed CDSS design links a specific medication through the CPOE in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) |
0 points Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. |
4 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. |
4.4 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. |
4.6 points Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. |
5 points Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
Discussion of the Rationale Behind the Design Development Discussion of the Rationale Behind the Design Development |
0 points A discussion of the rationale behind the design development is not present. |
4 points A discussion of the rationale behind the design development is present but incomplete. |
4.4 points A discussion of the rationale behind the design development is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. |
4.6 points A discussion of the rationale behind the design development is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
5 points A discussion of the rationale behind the design development is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) Used to Design a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS)Com Computerized Provider Order Entry (CPOE) Used to Design a Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) |
0 points CPOE is not used to design a CDSS. |
12 points CPOE is used to design a CDSS but use is marginal or incomplete. |
13.2 points CPOE is used to design a CDSS but used at a perfunctory level. |
13.8 points CPOE is used to design a CDSS in full. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
15 points CPOE is used to design a CDSS in full. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
Documentation of Sources Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) |
0 points Sources are not documented. |
4 points Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. |
4.4 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. |
4.6 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. |
5 points Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. |
Discussion of Specific Details of Clinical Issue Involving the Selected Medication Discussion of Specific Details of Clinical Issue Involving the Selected Medication |
0 points Discussion of specific details of the clinical issue involving the selected medication is not present. |
4 points Discussion of specific details of the clinical issue involving the selected medication is present but incomplete. |
4.4 points Discussion of specific details of the clinical issue involving the selected medication is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. |
4.6 points Discussion of specific details of the clinical issue involving the selected medication is convincing and thorough. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
5 points Discussion of specific details of the clinical issue involving the selected medication is convincing and thorough. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |
Description of How Proposed CDSS Will Be Implemented and Adopted by Fellow Clinicians Description of How Proposed CDSS Will Be Implemented and Adopted by Fellow Clinicians |
0 points A description of how the proposed CDSS will be implemented and adopted by fellow clinicians is not provided. |
8 points A description of how the proposed CDSS will be implemented and adopted by fellow clinicians is present but incomplete. |
8.8 points A description of how the proposed CDSS will be implemented and adopted by fellow clinicians is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. |
9.2 points A description of how the proposed CDSS will be implemented and adopted by fellow clinicians is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. |
10 points A description of how the proposed CDSS will be implemented and adopted by fellow clinicians is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. |