Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

DNP 805 Assignment EHR Database and Data Management

DNP 805 Assignment EHR Database and Data Management

Assessment Description

As a DNP-prepared nurse, you may be called upon to assist in the design of a clinical database for your organization. This assignment requires you to integrate a clinical problem with data technologies to better understand the components as well as how those components can lead to better clinical outcomes.

General Guidelines:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  • Use primary sources published within the last 5 years. Provide citations and references for all sources used.
  • Refer to the examples in the topic resources for health care database examples.
  • You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
  • Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the learning management system. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use.

Directions:

For this assignment, write a 1,000-1,250 word paper in which you:

  1. Select a clinically based patient problem in which using a database management approach provides clear benefit potential.
  2. Consider how a hypothetical database could be created to assist with this clinically based patient problem. Identify and describe the data needed to manage this patient problem using information from the electronic health record (EHR).
  3. Include a brief description of the patient problem that incorporates information needed to manage the specific problem. Describe what information is required for the patient to manage the condition and how the database and health care provider can be incorporated into the approach for better health outcomes.
  4. Describe each entity (data or attribute) that will be pulled from the EHR as either structured or unstructured and provide an operational definition for each. Structured data is more easily searchable and specifically defined. For example, structured data can be placed in a drop-down menu like hair color: brown, black, grey, salt and pepper, blonde, platinum, etc. Unstructured data is data that would be included in a nurse’s notes. An operational definition is how a researcher or informatics specialist decides to measure a variable. For example, when the nurses enter height into the EHR, do they enter height as measured in inches or centimeters or in feet and inches?
  5. Provide a complete description of data entities (the objects for which you seek information, e.g., patients) and their relationships to the attributes collected for each entity (data collected for each entity, e.g., gender, birthdate, first name, last name) that apply to the hypothetical database. You can use a concept map similar to the “Database Concept Map” resource, to help you describe the relationships between each entity and its attributes.

Attachments

DNP 805 Assignment EHR Database and Data Management

DNP 805 Assignment EHR Database and Data Management

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:DNP 805 Assignment EHR Database and Data Management

DNP-805A-RS-DatabaseConceptMap.do

 

Rubric Criteria

Total100 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3. Satisfactory

4. Good

5. Excellent

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

4.4 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

4.6 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Patient Problem Description Incorporates Information Needed to Manage the Problem

Patient Problem Description Incorporates Information Needed to Manage the Problem

0 points

Patient problem description that incorporates information needed to manage the problem is not present.

12 points

Patient problem description that incorporates information needed to manage the problem is marginal or incomplete.

13.2 points

Patient problem description that incorporates information needed to manage the problem is present but at a perfunctory level.

13.8 points

Patient problem description that incorporates information needed to manage the problem is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.

15 points

Patient problem description that incorporates information needed to manage the problem is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

Documentation of Sources

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

0 points

Sources are not documented.

4 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

4.4 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

4.6 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Thesis Development and Purpose

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

5.6 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

6.16 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

6.44 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

7 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Identification of EHR-Supplied Data as Structured or Unstructured With Explanation

Identification of EHR-Supplied Data as Structured or Unstructured With Explanation

0 points

Identification of EHR-supplied data as structured or unstructured with an explanation is not present.

8 points

Identification of EHR-supplied data as structured or unstructured is present with or without an explanation but is marginal or incomplete.

8.8 points

Identification of EHR-supplied data as structured or unstructured is present with an explanation but is rendered at a perfunctory level.

9.2 points

Identification of EHR-supplied data as structured or unstructured is present with a thorough explanation. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.

10 points

Identification of EHR-supplied data as structured or unstructured is present with a thorough explanation. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

Argument Logic and Construction

Argument Logic and Construction

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

6.4 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

7.04 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

7.36 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

8 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

4 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

4.4 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

4.6 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

5 points

All format elements are correct.

Data Relationships That Apply to the Hypothetical Database

Data Relationships That Apply to the Hypothetical Database

0 points

Data relationships that apply to the hypothetical database are not described.

12 points

Data relationships that apply to the hypothetical database are described, but description is marginal or incomplete.

13.2 points

Data relationships that apply to the hypothetical database are described, but description is rendered at a perfunctory level.

13.8 points

Data relationships that apply to the hypothetical database are not described in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.

15 points

Data relationships that apply to the hypothetical database are not described in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

Structured and Unstructured Data From the EHR That Are Needed to Organize a Hypothetical Database

Structured and Unstructured Data From the EHR That Are Needed to Organize a Hypothetical Database

0 points

Structured and unstructured data from the EHR needed to organize a hypothetical database are not described.

8 points

Structured and unstructured data from the EHR needed to organize a hypothetical database are described, but description is marginal or incomplete.

8.8 points

Structured and unstructured data from the EHR needed to organize a hypothetical database are described, but description is rendered at a perfunctory level.

9.2 points

Structured and unstructured data from the EHR needed to organize a hypothetical database are described in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.

10 points

Structured and unstructured data from the EHR needed to organize a hypothetical database are described in full. A discussion of the rationale behind the design development is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

Identification of Data Needed to Manage the Patient Problem Using Information From the Electronic He

Identification of Data Needed to Manage the Patient Problem Using Information From the Electronic Health Record (EHR)

0 points

Identification of data needed to manage the patient problem using information from the electronic health record (EHR) is not present.

8 points

Identification of data needed to manage the patient problem using information from the electronic health record (EHR) is marginal or incomplete.

8.8 points

Identification of data needed to manage the patient problem using information from the electronic health record (EHR) is present but at a perfunctory level.

9.2 points

Identification of data needed to manage the patient problem using information from the electronic health record (EHR) is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.

10 points

Identification of data needed to manage the patient problem using information from the electronic health record (EHR) is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

Selection of Clinically-Based Patient Problem

Selection of Clinically-Based Patient Problem

0 points

Patient problem selection does not provide clear benefit potential by using a database management approach.

8 points

Patient problem selection indicates some benefit potential by using a database management approach, but the connection is marginal or incomplete.

8.8 points

Patient problem selection indicates clear benefit potential by using a database management approach, but the connection is perfunctory.

9.2 points

Patient problem selection indicates clear benefit potential by using a database management approach. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.

10 points

Patient problem selection indicates clear benefit potential by using a database management approach. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

EHR Database and Data Management – Rubric

Collapse All EHR Database And Data Management – RubricCollapse All

Selection of Clinically-Based Patient Problem

10 points

Criteria Description

Selection of Clinically-Based Patient Problem

  1. Excellent

10 points

Patient problem selection indicates clear benefit potential by using a database management approach. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

  1. Good

9.2 points

Patient problem selection indicates clear benefit potential by using a database management approach. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.

  1. Satisfactory

8.8 points

Patient problem selection indicates clear benefit potential by using a database management approach, but the connection is perfunctory.

  1. Less Than Satisfactory

8 points

Patient problem selection indicates some benefit potential by using a database management approach, but the connection is marginal or incomplete.

  1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Patient problem selection does not provide clear benefit potential by using a database management approach.

10 points

Criteria Description

Identification of Data Needed to Manage the Patient Problem Using Information From the Electronic Health Record (EHR)

  1. Excellent

10 points

Identification of data needed to manage the patient problem using information from the electronic health record (EHR) is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

  1. Good

9.2 points

Identification of data needed to manage the patient problem using information from the electronic health record (EHR) is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.

  1. Satisfactory

8.8 points

Identification of data needed to manage the patient problem using information from the electronic health record (EHR) is present but at a perfunctory level.

  1. Less Than Satisfactory

8 points

Identification of data needed to manage the patient problem using information from the electronic health record (EHR) is marginal or incomplete.

  1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Identification of data needed to manage the patient problem using information from the electronic health record (EHR) is not present.

Patient Problem Description Incorporates Information Needed to Manage the Problem

15 points

Criteria Description

Patient Problem Description Incorporates Information Needed to Manage the Problem

  1. Excellent

15 points

Patient problem description that incorporates information needed to manage the problem is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

  1. Good

13.8 points

Patient problem description that incorporates information needed to manage the problem is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.

  1. Satisfactory

13.2 points

Patient problem description that incorporates information needed to manage the problem is present but at a perfunctory level.

  1. Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

Patient problem description that incorporates information needed to manage the problem is marginal or incomplete.

  1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Patient problem description that incorporates information needed to manage the problem is not present.

Identification of EHR-Supplied Data as Structured or Unstructured With Explanation

10 points

Criteria Description

Identification of EHR-Supplied Data as Structured or Unstructured With Explanation

  1. Excellent

10 points

Identification of EHR-supplied data as structured or unstructured is present with a thorough explanation. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

  1. Good

9.2 points

Identification of EHR-supplied data as structured or unstructured is present with a thorough explanation. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.

  1. Satisfactory

8.8 points

Identification of EHR-supplied data as structured or unstructured is present with an explanation but is rendered at a perfunctory level.

  1. Less Than Satisfactory

8 points

Identification of EHR-supplied data as structured or unstructured is present with or without an explanation but is marginal or incomplete.

  1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Identification of EHR-supplied data as structured or unstructured with an explanation is not present.

Structured and Unstructured Data From the EHR That Are Needed to Organize a Hypothetical Database

10 points

Criteria Description

Structured and Unstructured Data From the EHR That Are Needed to Organize a Hypothetical Database

  1. Excellent

10 points

Structured and unstructured data from the EHR needed to organize a hypothetical database are described in full. A discussion of the rationale behind the design development is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

  1. Good

9.2 points

Structured and unstructured data from the EHR needed to organize a hypothetical database are described in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.

  1. Satisfactory

8.8 points

Structured and unstructured data from the EHR needed to organize a hypothetical database are described, but description is rendered at a perfunctory level.

  1. Less Than Satisfactory

8 points

Structured and unstructured data from the EHR needed to organize a hypothetical database are described, but description is marginal or incomplete.

  1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Structured and unstructured data from the EHR needed to organize a hypothetical database are not described.

Data Relationships That Apply to the Hypothetical Database

15 points

Criteria Description

Data Relationships That Apply to the Hypothetical Database

  1. Excellent

15 points

Data relationships that apply to the hypothetical database are not described in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.

  1. Good

13.8 points

Data relationships that apply to the hypothetical database are not described in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.

  1. Satisfactory

13.2 points

Data relationships that apply to the hypothetical database are described, but description is rendered at a perfunctory level.

  1. Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

Data relationships that apply to the hypothetical database are described, but description is marginal or incomplete.

  1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Data relationships that apply to the hypothetical database are not described.

Thesis Development and Purpose

7 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

  1. Excellent

7 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

  1. Good

6.44 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

  1. Satisfactory

6.16 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

  1. Less Than Satisfactory

5.6 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

  1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Argument Logic and Construction

8 points

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

  1. Excellent

8 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

  1. Good

7.36 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

  1. Satisfactory

7.04 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

  1. Less Than Satisfactory

6.4 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

  1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

  1. Excellent

5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

  1. Good

4.6 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

  1. Satisfactory

4.4 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

  1. Less Than Satisfactory

4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

  1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

  1. Excellent

5 points

All format elements are correct.

  1. Good

4.6 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

  1. Satisfactory

4.4 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

  1. Less Than Satisfactory

4 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

  1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources

5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

  1. Excellent

5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

  1. Good

4.6 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

  1. Satisfactory

4.4 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

  1. Less Than Satisfactory

4 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

  1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total 100 points

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.