DNP 801 Topic 5 Annotated Bibliography

Details:
The purpose of this assignment is to be able to actively search for relevant research related to your PICOT topic and present it in a formal annotated bibliography.General Requirements:

• Refer to the resource, “Preparing Annotated Bibliographies,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
• Doctoral learners are required to use Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
• This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
• You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

Directions:

As you search the library for scholarly research, limit your search to identify empirical articles. You can use the “Empirical Research Checklist” to help with this determination. Upon finding an empirical study, assess the validity of the conclusion by determining if the conclusion answers your proposed research question and if the methodology is appropriate.

Using the “Empirical Research Checklist” and your knowledge of finding empirical research articles, locate six articles directly related to your proposed PICOT question. You may use the three you used for the assignment in Topic 4.

Write an annotation for each of the six articles that includes a concise summary in your own words and the correct APA citation for each article.

The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate empirical research as it relates to your PICOT question.

General Requirements:

• Doctoral learners are required to use Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
• This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
• You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Directions:

Using feedback from your instructor on your PICOT question and annotated bibliographies, revise your PICOT question and annotations.

Using your annotations, write a 1,250-1500 word paper, in which you evaluate the literature, including the study conclusions, merits, and shortcomings. Your evaluation should address the following questions, and your conclusions should be supported with appropriate citations.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:DNP 801 Topic 5 Annotated Bibliography

1. In which studies are the themes of the literature review similar? Different?
2. In which studies do the data support the conclusion?
3. In which studies do the conclusions answer the research question?
4. What questions would you ask the authors?
5. How might the evidence in these studies be of use to refining you PICOT question or perhaps formulating or implementing your DPI project?
6. Exit Grid View
    List View
   Excellent
   Point range: 90–100

   Good
   Point range: 80–89

   Fair
   Point range: 70–79

   Poor
   Point range: 0–69

   Introduction to the case (1
   page)
   Briefly explain and summarize
   the case for this Assignment.
   Be sure to include the specific
   patient factors that may impact
   your decision making when

   prescribing medication for this
   patient.

   9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
   The response accurately, clearly,
   and fully summarizes in detail the
   case for the Assignment.
   The response accurately and
   clearly explains in detail the
   specific patient factors that
   impact decision making when
   prescribing medication for this
   patient.

   8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
   The response accurately
   summarizes the case for the
   Assignment.
   The response accurately explains
   the specific patient factors that
   impact decision making with
   prescribing medication for this
   patient.

   7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
   The response inaccurately or
   vaguely summarizes the case for
   the Assignment.
   The response inaccurately or

   vaguely explains the specific
   patient factors that impact
   decision making with prescribing
   medication for this patient.

   0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
   The response inaccurately and
   vaguely summarizes the case for
   the Assignment, or is missing.
   The response inaccurately and
   vaguely explains the specific
   patient factors that impact
   decision making with prescribing
   medication for this patient.

   Decision #1 (1–2 pages)
   • Which decision did you
   select?
   • Why did you select this
   decision? Be specific and
   support your response with
   clinically relevant and patient-
   specific resources, including
   the primary literature.
   • Why did you not select the

   18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
   The response accurately and
   clearly explains in detail the

   decision selected.
   The response accurately and
   clearly explains in detail why the
   decision was selected, with
   specific clinically relevant
   resources that fully support the
   decision selected.

   16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
   The response accurately explains
   the decision selected.
   The response explains why the
   decision was selected, with
   specific clinically relevant
   resources that support the
   decision selected.
   The response accurately explains

   14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
   The response inaccurately or
   vaguely explains the decision
   selected.
   The response inaccurately or
   vaguely explains why the
   decision was selected, with
   specific clinically relevant
   resources that inaccurately or
   vaguely support the decision

   0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
   The response inaccurately and
   vaguely explains the decision
   selected.
   The response inaccurately and
   vaguely explains why the
   decision was selected, with
   specific clinically relevant
   resources that do not support the
   decision selected, or is missing.

   other two options provided in
   the exercise? Be specific and
   support your response with
   clinically relevant and patient-
   specific resources, including
   the primary literature.
   • What were you hoping to
   achieve by making this
   decision? Support your
   response with evidence and
   references to the Learning
   Resources (including the
   primary literature).
   • Explain how ethical
   considerations may impact
   your treatment plan and
   communication with patients.
   Be specific and provide

   examples.

   The response accurately and
   clearly explains in detail why the
   other two responses were not
   selected, with specific clinically
   relevant resources that fully
   support the response.
   The response accurately and
   clearly explains in detail the
   outcome the student was hoping
   to achieve with the selected
   decision, with specific clinically
   relevant resources that fully
   support the response.
   The response accurately and
   clearly explains in detail how
   ethical considerations impact the
   treatment plan and
   communication with patients.
   Examples provided fully support
   the decisions and responses
   provided.

   why the other two responses
   were not selected, with specific
   clinically relevant resources that
   support the response.
   The response accurately explains

   the outcome the student was
   hoping to achieve with the
   selected decision, with specific
   clinically relevant resources that
   support the response.
   The response accurately explains
   how ethical considerations
   impact the treatment plan and
   communication with patients.
   Examples provided support the
   decisions and responses
   provided.

   selected.
   The response inaccurately or
   vaguely explains why the other
   two responses were not selected,
   with specific clinically relevant
   resources that inaccurately or
   vaguely support the response.
   The response inaccurately or
   vaguely explains the outcome the
   student was hoping to achieve
   with the selected decision, with
   specific clinically relevant
   resources that inaccurately or
   vaguely support the response.
   The response inaccurately or
   vaguely explains how ethical

   considerations impact the
   treatment plan and
   communication with patients.
   Examples provided may support
   the decisions and responses
   provided.

   The response inaccurately and
   vaguely explains why the other
   two responses were not selected,
   with specific clinically relevant
   resources that do not support the
   decision selected, or is missing.
   The response inaccurately and
   vaguely explains the outcome the
   student was hoping to achieve
   with the selected decision, with
   specific clinically relevant
   resources that do not support the
   response, or is missing.
   The response inaccurately and
   vaguely explains how ethical
   considerations impact the
   treatment plan and
   communication with patients, or
   is missing.
   Examples provided do not
   support the decisions and
   responses provided, or is

   missing.

   Decision #2 (1–2 pages)
   • Which decision did you
   select?
   • Why did you select this
   decision? Be specific and
   support your response with
   clinically relevant and patient-
   specific resources, including
   the primary literature.
   • Why did you not select the
   other two options provided in
   the exercise? Be specific and
   support your response with
   clinically relevant and patient-
   specific resources, including
   the primary literature.
   • What were you hoping to

   18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
   The response accurately and
   clearly explains in detail the
   decision selected.
   The response accurately and
   clearly explains in detail why the
   decision was selected, with
   specific clinically relevant
   resources that fully support the

   decision selected.
   The response accurately and
   clearly explains in detail why the
   other two responses were not
   selected, with specific clinically
   relevant resources that fully
   support the response.

   16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
   The response accurately explains
   the decision selected.
   The response explains why the
   decision was selected, with
   specific clinically relevant
   resources that support the
   decision selected.
   The response accurately explains
   why the other two responses
   were not selected, with specific
   clinically relevant resources that
   support the response.
   The response accurately explains
   the outcome the student was

   14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
   The response inaccurately or
   vaguely explains the decision
   selected.
   The response inaccurately or

   vaguely explains why the
   decision was selected, with
   specific clinically relevant
   resources that inaccurately or
   vaguely support the decision
   selected.
   The response inaccurately or
   vaguely explains why the other
   two responses were not selected,
   with specific clinically relevant
   resources that inaccurately or

   0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
   The response inaccurately and
   vaguely explains in detail the
   decision selected.
   The response inaccurately and
   vaguely explains why the
   decision was selected, with
   specific clinically relevant
   resources that do not support the
   decision selected, or is missing.
   The response inaccurately and
   vaguely explains why the other
   two responses were not selected,
   with specific clinically relevant
   resources that do not support the
   decision selected, or is missing.

   achieve by making this
   decision? Support your
   response with evidence and
   references to the Learning
   Resources (including the
   primary literature).
   • Explain how ethical
   considerations may impact
   your treatment plan and
   communication with patients.
   Be specific and provide
   examples.

   The response accurately and
   clearly explains in detail the
   outcome the student was hoping
   to achieve with the selected
   decision, with specific clinically
   relevant resources that fully
   support the response.
   The response accurately and
   clearly explains in detail how
   ethical considerations impact the
   treatment plan and
   communication with patients.
   Examples provided fully support
   the decisions and responses
   provided.

   hoping to achieve with the
   selected decision, with specific
   clinically relevant resources that
   support the response.
   The response accurately explains
   how ethical considerations
   impact the treatment plan and
   communication with patients.
   Examples provided support the
   decisions and responses
   provided.

   vaguely support the response.
   The response inaccurately or
   vaguely explains the outcome the
   student was hoping to achieve
   with the selected decision, with
   specific clinically relevant
   resources that inaccurately or
   vaguely support the response.
   The response inaccurately or
   vaguely explains how ethical
   considerations impact the
   treatment plan and
   communication with patients.
   Examples provided may support
   the decisions and responses
   provided.

   The response inaccurately and
   vaguely explains the outcome the
   student was hoping to achieve
   with the selected decision, with
   specific clinically relevant
   resources that do not support the
   response, or is missing.
   The response inaccurately and
   vaguely explains how ethical
   considerations impact the
   treatment plan and
   communication with patients, or
   is missing.
   Examples provided do not
   support the decisions and
   responses provided, or is
   missing.

   Decision #3 (1–2 pages)
   • Which decision did you
   select?
   • Why did you select this
   decision? Be specific and
   support your response with
   clinically relevant and patient-
   specific resources, including
   the primary literature.
   • Why did you not select the
   other two options provided in

   the exercise? Be specific and
   support your response with
   clinically relevant and patient-
   specific resources, including
   the primary literature.
   • What were you hoping to
   achieve by making this
   decision? Support your
   response with evidence and
   references to the Learning
   Resources (including the
   primary literature).
   • Explain how ethical

   18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
   The response accurately and
   clearly explains in detail the
   decision selected.
   The response accurately and
   clearly explains in detail why the
   decision was selected, with
   specific clinically relevant
   resources that fully support the
   decision selected.
   The response accurately and
   clearly explains in detail why the
   other two responses were not
   selected, with specific clinically
   relevant resources that fully

   support the response.
   The response accurately and
   clearly explains in detail the
   outcome the student was hoping
   to achieve with the selected
   decision, with specific clinically
   relevant resources that fully

   16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
   The response accurately explains
   the decision selected.
   The response explains why the
   decision was selected, with
   specific clinically relevant
   resources that support the
   decision selected.
   The response accurately explains
   why the other two responses
   were not selected, with specific
   clinically relevant resources that
   support the response.
   The response accurately explains
   the outcome the student was
   hoping to achieve with the
   selected decision, with specific
   clinically relevant resources that
   support the response.
   The response accurately explains
   how ethical considerations

   14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
   The response inaccurately or
   vaguely explains the decision
   selected.
   The response inaccurately or
   vaguely explains why the
   decision was selected, with
   specific clinically relevant
   resources that inaccurately or
   vaguely support the decision
   selected.
   The response inaccurately or
   vaguely explains why the other
   two responses were not selected,
   with specific clinically relevant
   resources that inaccurately or
   vaguely support the response.
   The response inaccurately or
   vaguely explains the outcome the
   student was hoping to achieve
   with the selected decision, with
   specific clinically relevant

   0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
   The response inaccurately and
   vaguely explains in detail the
   decision selected.
   The response inaccurately and

   vaguely explains why the
   decision was selected, with
   specific clinically relevant
   resources that do not support the
   decision selected, or is missing.
   The response inaccurately and
   vaguely explains why the other
   two responses were not selected,
   with specific clinically relevant
   resources that do not support the
   decision selected, or is missing.
   The response inaccurately and
   vaguely explains the outcome the
   student was hoping to achieve
   with the selected decision, with
   specific clinically relevant
   resources that do not support the

   considerations may impact
   your treatment plan and
   communication with patients.
   Be specific and provide
   examples.

   support the response.
   The response accurately and
   clearly explains in detail how
   ethical considerations impact the
   treatment plan and

   communication with patients.
   Examples provided fully support
   the decisions and responses
   provided.

   impact the treatment plan and
   communication with patients.
   Examples provided support the
   decisions and responses
   provided.

   resources that inaccurately or
   vaguely support the response.
   The response inaccurately or
   vaguely explains how ethical
   considerations impact the
   treatment plan and
   communication with patients.
   Examples provided may support
   the decisions and responses
   provided.

   response, or is missing.
   The response inaccurately and
   vaguely explains how ethical
   considerations impact the
   treatment plan and
   communication with patients, or
   is missing.

   Examples provided do not
   support the decisions and
   responses provided, or is
   missing.

   Conclusion (1 page)
   • Summarize your
   recommendations on the
   treatment options you selected
   for this patient. Be sure to
   justify your recommendations
   and support your response
   with clinically relevant and
   patient-specific resources,
   including the primary literature.

   14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
   The response accurately and
   clearly summarizes in detail the
   recommendations on the
   treatment options selected for
   this patient.
   The response accurately and
   clearly explains a justification for
   the recommendations provided,
   including clinically relevant
   resources that fully support the
   recommendations provided.

   12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
   The response accurately
   summarizes the
   recommendations on the
   treatment options selected for
   this patient.
   The response accurately explains
   a justification for the
   recommendation provided,
   including clinically relevant
   resources that support the
   recommendations provided.

   11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
   The response inaccurately or
   vaguely summarizes the
   recommendations on the
   treatment options selected for
   this patient.
   The response inaccurately or
   vaguely explains a justification for
   the recommendations provided,
   including clinically relevant
   resources that inaccurately or
   vaguely support the
   recommendations provided.

   0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
   The response inaccurately and

   vaguely summarizes the
   recommendations on the
   treatment options selected for
   this patient, or is missing.
   The response inaccurately and
   vaguely explains a justification for
   the recommendations provided,
   including clinically relevant
   resources that do not support the
   recommendations provided, or is
   missing.

   Written Expression and
   Formatting – Paragraph
   Development and Organization:
   Paragraphs make clear points
   that support well-developed
   ideas, flow logically, and
   demonstrate continuity of
   ideas. Sentences are carefully
   focused—neither long and
   rambling nor short and lacking
   substance. A clear and
   comprehensive purpose
   statement and introduction are
   provided that delineate all
   required criteria.

   5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

   Paragraphs and sentences follow
   writing standards for flow,
   continuity, and clarity.
   A clear and comprehensive
   purpose statement, introduction,
   and conclusion are provided that
   delineate all required criteria.

   4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
   Paragraphs and sentences follow
   writing standards for flow,
   continuity, and clarity 80% of the
   time.
   Purpose, introduction, and
   conclusion of the assignment are
   stated, yet they are brief and not
   descriptive.

   3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
   Paragraphs and sentences follow
   writing standards for flow,
   continuity, and clarity 60%–79%
   of the time.
   Purpose, introduction, and
   conclusion of the assignment is
   vague or off topic.

   0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
   Paragraphs and sentences follow

   writing standards for flow,
   continuity, and clarity < 60% of
   the time.
   No purpose statement,
   introduction, or conclusion were
   provided.

   Written Expression and
   Formatting – English writing
   standards:
   Correct grammar, mechanics,
   and proper punctuation

   5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
   Uses correct grammar, spelling,
   and punctuation with no errors.

   4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
   Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar,
   spelling, and punctuation errors.

   3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
   Contains several (3 or 4)
   grammar, spelling, and
   punctuation errors.

   0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
   Contains many (≥ 5) grammar,
   spelling, and punctuation errors

   that interfere with the reader’s
   understanding.

   Written Expression and
   Formatting – The paper follows
   correct APA format for title
   page, headings, font,
   spacing, margins, indentations,
   page numbers, parenthetical/in-
   text citations, and reference
   list.

   5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
   Uses correct APA format with no
   errors.

   4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
   Contains a few (1 or 2) APA
   format errors.

   3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
   Contains several (3 or 4) APA
   format errors.

   0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
   Contains many (≥ 5) APA format
   errors.

   Total Points: 100