DNP 801 Topic 5 Annotated Bibliography
DNP 801 Topic 5 Annotated Bibliography
The purpose of this assignment is to be able to actively search for relevant research related to your PICOT topic and present it in a formal annotated bibliography.General Requirements:
- Refer to the resource, “Preparing Annotated Bibliographies,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
- Doctoral learners are required to use Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
- This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
- You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
Directions:
As you search the library for scholarly research, limit your search to identify empirical articles. You can use the “Empirical Research Checklist” to help with this determination. Upon finding an empirical study, assess the validity of the conclusion by determining if the conclusion answers your proposed research question and if the methodology is appropriate.
Using the “Empirical Research Checklist” and your knowledge of finding empirical research articles, locate six articles directly related to your proposed PICOT question. You may use the three you used for the assignment in Topic 4.
Write an annotation for each of the six articles that includes a concise summary in your own words and the correct APA citation for each article.
DNP 801 Topic 8 Evaluation of Research
Details:
The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate empirical research as it relates to your PICOT question.
General Requirements:
- Doctoral learners are required to use Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
- This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
- You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions:
Using feedback from your instructor on your PICOT question and annotated bibliographies, revise your PICOT question and annotations.
Using your annotations, write a 1,250-1500 word paper, in which you evaluate the literature, including the study conclusions, merits, and shortcomings. Your evaluation should address the following questions, and your conclusions should be supported with appropriate citations.

DNP 801 Topic 5 Annotated Bibliography
- In which studies are the themes of the literature review similar? Different?
- In which studies do the data support the conclusion?
- In which studies do the conclusions answer the research question?
- What questions would you ask the authors?
- How might the evidence in these studies be of use to refining you PICOT question or perhaps formulating or implementing your DPI project?
- Exit Grid View
List View
Excellent
Point range: 90–100Good
Point range: 80–89Fair
Point range: 70–79Poor
Point range: 0–69Introduction to the case (1
page)
Briefly explain and summarize
the case for this Assignment.
Be sure to include the specific
patient factors that may impact
your decision making whenprescribing medication for this
patient.9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
The response accurately, clearly,
and fully summarizes in detail the
case for the Assignment.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
specific patient factors that
impact decision making when
prescribing medication for this
patient.8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
The response accurately
summarizes the case for the
Assignment.
The response accurately explains
the specific patient factors that
impact decision making with
prescribing medication for this
patient.7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
The response inaccurately or
vaguely summarizes the case for
the Assignment.
The response inaccurately orvaguely explains the specific
patient factors that impact
decision making with prescribing
medication for this patient.0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
The response inaccurately and
vaguely summarizes the case for
the Assignment, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains the specific
patient factors that impact
decision making with prescribing
medication for this patient.Decision #1 (1–2 pages)
• Which decision did you
select?
• Why did you select this
decision? Be specific and
support your response with
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
• Why did you not select the18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail thedecision selected.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that fully support the
decision selected.16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately explains
the decision selected.
The response explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that support the
decision selected.
The response accurately explains14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the decision0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.other two options provided in
the exercise? Be specific and
support your response with
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
• What were you hoping to
achieve by making this
decision? Support your
response with evidence and
references to the Learning
Resources (including the
primary literature).
• Explain how ethical
considerations may impact
your treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Be specific and provideexamples.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
other two responses were not
selected, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully
support the response.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
outcome the student was hoping
to achieve with the selected
decision, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully
support the response.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail how
ethical considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided fully support
the decisions and responses
provided.why the other two responses
were not selected, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explainsthe outcome the student was
hoping to achieve with the
selected decision, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
how ethical considerations
impact the treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided support the
decisions and responses
provided.selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains how ethicalconsiderations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided may support
the decisions and responses
provided.The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
response, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients, or
is missing.
Examples provided do not
support the decisions and
responses provided, or ismissing.
Decision #2 (1–2 pages)
• Which decision did you
select?
• Why did you select this
decision? Be specific and
support your response with
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
• Why did you not select the
other two options provided in
the exercise? Be specific and
support your response with
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
• What were you hoping to18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
decision selected.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that fully support thedecision selected.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
other two responses were not
selected, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully
support the response.16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately explains
the decision selected.
The response explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that support the
decision selected.
The response accurately explains
why the other two responses
were not selected, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
the outcome the student was14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately orvaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains in detail the
decision selected.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.achieve by making this
decision? Support your
response with evidence and
references to the Learning
Resources (including the
primary literature).
• Explain how ethical
considerations may impact
your treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Be specific and provide
examples.The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
outcome the student was hoping
to achieve with the selected
decision, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully
support the response.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail how
ethical considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided fully support
the decisions and responses
provided.hoping to achieve with the
selected decision, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
how ethical considerations
impact the treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided support the
decisions and responses
provided.vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided may support
the decisions and responses
provided.The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
response, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients, or
is missing.
Examples provided do not
support the decisions and
responses provided, or is
missing.Decision #3 (1–2 pages)
• Which decision did you
select?
• Why did you select this
decision? Be specific and
support your response with
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
• Why did you not select the
other two options provided inthe exercise? Be specific and
support your response with
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
• What were you hoping to
achieve by making this
decision? Support your
response with evidence and
references to the Learning
Resources (including the
primary literature).
• Explain how ethical18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
decision selected.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that fully support the
decision selected.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
other two responses were not
selected, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fullysupport the response.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
outcome the student was hoping
to achieve with the selected
decision, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately explains
the decision selected.
The response explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that support the
decision selected.
The response accurately explains
why the other two responses
were not selected, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
the outcome the student was
hoping to achieve with the
selected decision, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
how ethical considerations14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains in detail the
decision selected.
The response inaccurately andvaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support theconsiderations may impact
your treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Be specific and provide
examples.support the response.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail how
ethical considerations impact the
treatment plan andcommunication with patients.
Examples provided fully support
the decisions and responses
provided.impact the treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided support the
decisions and responses
provided.resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided may support
the decisions and responses
provided.response, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients, or
is missing.Examples provided do not
support the decisions and
responses provided, or is
missing.Conclusion (1 page)
• Summarize your
recommendations on the
treatment options you selected
for this patient. Be sure to
justify your recommendations
and support your response
with clinically relevant and
patient-specific resources,
including the primary literature.14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response accurately and
clearly summarizes in detail the
recommendations on the
treatment options selected for
this patient.
The response accurately and
clearly explains a justification for
the recommendations provided,
including clinically relevant
resources that fully support the
recommendations provided.12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The response accurately
summarizes the
recommendations on the
treatment options selected for
this patient.
The response accurately explains
a justification for the
recommendation provided,
including clinically relevant
resources that support the
recommendations provided.11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
The response inaccurately or
vaguely summarizes the
recommendations on the
treatment options selected for
this patient.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains a justification for
the recommendations provided,
including clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the
recommendations provided.0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
The response inaccurately andvaguely summarizes the
recommendations on the
treatment options selected for
this patient, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains a justification for
the recommendations provided,
including clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
recommendations provided, or is
missing.Written Expression and
Formatting – Paragraph
Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points
that support well-developed
ideas, flow logically, and
demonstrate continuity of
ideas. Sentences are carefully
focused—neither long and
rambling nor short and lacking
substance. A clear and
comprehensive purpose
statement and introduction are
provided that delineate all
required criteria.5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow
writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive
purpose statement, introduction,
and conclusion are provided that
delineate all required criteria.4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow
writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity 80% of the
time.
Purpose, introduction, and
conclusion of the assignment are
stated, yet they are brief and not
descriptive.3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow
writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity 60%–79%
of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and
conclusion of the assignment is
vague or off topic.0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences followwriting standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity < 60% of
the time.
No purpose statement,
introduction, or conclusion were
provided.Written Expression and
Formatting – English writing
standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics,
and proper punctuation5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling,
and punctuation with no errors.4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar,
spelling, and punctuation errors.3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4)
grammar, spelling, and
punctuation errors.0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar,
spelling, and punctuation errorsthat interfere with the reader’s
understanding.Written Expression and
Formatting – The paper follows
correct APA format for title
page, headings, font,
spacing, margins, indentations,
page numbers, parenthetical/in-
text citations, and reference
list.5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no
errors.4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA
format errors.3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA
format errors.0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format
errors.Total Points: 100