Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

DNP 801 Topic 5 Annotated Bibliography

DNP 801 Topic 5 Annotated Bibliography

Details:
The purpose of this assignment is to be able to actively search for relevant research related to your PICOT topic and present it in a formal annotated bibliography.General Requirements:

  • Refer to the resource, “Preparing Annotated Bibliographies,” located in the Student Success Center, for additional guidance on completing this assignment in the appropriate style.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  • You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

Directions:

As you search the library for scholarly research, limit your search to identify empirical articles. You can use the “Empirical Research Checklist” to help with this determination. Upon finding an empirical study, assess the validity of the conclusion by determining if the conclusion answers your proposed research question and if the methodology is appropriate.

Using the “Empirical Research Checklist” and your knowledge of finding empirical research articles, locate six articles directly related to your proposed PICOT question. You may use the three you used for the assignment in Topic 4.

Write an annotation for each of the six articles that includes a concise summary in your own words and the correct APA citation for each article.

 

The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate empirical research as it relates to your PICOT question.

General Requirements:

  • Doctoral learners are required to use Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  • You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Directions:

Using feedback from your instructor on your PICOT question and annotated bibliographies, revise your PICOT question and annotations.

Using your annotations, write a 1,250-1500 word paper, in which you evaluate the literature, including the study conclusions, merits, and shortcomings. Your evaluation should address the following questions, and your conclusions should be supported with appropriate citations.

DNP 801 Topic 5 Annotated Bibliography

DNP 801 Topic 5 Annotated Bibliography

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:DNP 801 Topic 5 Annotated Bibliography

  1. In which studies are the themes of the literature review similar? Different?
  2. In which studies do the data support the conclusion?
  3. In which studies do the conclusions answer the research question?
  4. What questions would you ask the authors?
  5. How might the evidence in these studies be of use to refining you PICOT question or perhaps formulating or implementing your DPI project?
  6. Exit Grid View
     List View
    Excellent
    Point range: 90–100

    Good
    Point range: 80–89

    Fair
    Point range: 70–79

    Poor
    Point range: 0–69

    Introduction to the case (1
    page)
    Briefly explain and summarize
    the case for this Assignment.
    Be sure to include the specific
    patient factors that may impact
    your decision making when

    prescribing medication for this
    patient.

    9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
    The response accurately, clearly,
    and fully summarizes in detail the
    case for the Assignment.
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail the
    specific patient factors that
    impact decision making when
    prescribing medication for this
    patient.

    8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
    The response accurately
    summarizes the case for the
    Assignment.
    The response accurately explains
    the specific patient factors that
    impact decision making with
    prescribing medication for this
    patient.

    7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely summarizes the case for
    the Assignment.
    The response inaccurately or

    vaguely explains the specific
    patient factors that impact
    decision making with prescribing
    medication for this patient.

    0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely summarizes the case for
    the Assignment, or is missing.
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains the specific
    patient factors that impact
    decision making with prescribing
    medication for this patient.

    Decision #1 (1–2 pages)
    • Which decision did you
    select?
    • Why did you select this
    decision? Be specific and
    support your response with
    clinically relevant and patient-
    specific resources, including
    the primary literature.
    • Why did you not select the

    18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail the

    decision selected.
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail why the
    decision was selected, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that fully support the
    decision selected.

    16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
    The response accurately explains
    the decision selected.
    The response explains why the
    decision was selected, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that support the
    decision selected.
    The response accurately explains

    14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains the decision
    selected.
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains why the
    decision was selected, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that inaccurately or
    vaguely support the decision

    0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains the decision
    selected.
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains why the
    decision was selected, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that do not support the
    decision selected, or is missing.

    other two options provided in
    the exercise? Be specific and
    support your response with
    clinically relevant and patient-
    specific resources, including
    the primary literature.
    • What were you hoping to
    achieve by making this
    decision? Support your
    response with evidence and
    references to the Learning
    Resources (including the
    primary literature).
    • Explain how ethical
    considerations may impact
    your treatment plan and
    communication with patients.
    Be specific and provide

    examples.

    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail why the
    other two responses were not
    selected, with specific clinically
    relevant resources that fully
    support the response.
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail the
    outcome the student was hoping
    to achieve with the selected
    decision, with specific clinically
    relevant resources that fully
    support the response.
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail how
    ethical considerations impact the
    treatment plan and
    communication with patients.
    Examples provided fully support
    the decisions and responses
    provided.

    why the other two responses
    were not selected, with specific
    clinically relevant resources that
    support the response.
    The response accurately explains

    the outcome the student was
    hoping to achieve with the
    selected decision, with specific
    clinically relevant resources that
    support the response.
    The response accurately explains
    how ethical considerations
    impact the treatment plan and
    communication with patients.
    Examples provided support the
    decisions and responses
    provided.

    selected.
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains why the other
    two responses were not selected,
    with specific clinically relevant
    resources that inaccurately or
    vaguely support the response.
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains the outcome the
    student was hoping to achieve
    with the selected decision, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that inaccurately or
    vaguely support the response.
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains how ethical

    considerations impact the
    treatment plan and
    communication with patients.
    Examples provided may support
    the decisions and responses
    provided.

    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains why the other
    two responses were not selected,
    with specific clinically relevant
    resources that do not support the
    decision selected, or is missing.
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains the outcome the
    student was hoping to achieve
    with the selected decision, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that do not support the
    response, or is missing.
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains how ethical
    considerations impact the
    treatment plan and
    communication with patients, or
    is missing.
    Examples provided do not
    support the decisions and
    responses provided, or is

    missing.

    Decision #2 (1–2 pages)
    • Which decision did you
    select?
    • Why did you select this
    decision? Be specific and
    support your response with
    clinically relevant and patient-
    specific resources, including
    the primary literature.
    • Why did you not select the
    other two options provided in
    the exercise? Be specific and
    support your response with
    clinically relevant and patient-
    specific resources, including
    the primary literature.
    • What were you hoping to

    18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail the
    decision selected.
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail why the
    decision was selected, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that fully support the

    decision selected.
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail why the
    other two responses were not
    selected, with specific clinically
    relevant resources that fully
    support the response.

    16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
    The response accurately explains
    the decision selected.
    The response explains why the
    decision was selected, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that support the
    decision selected.
    The response accurately explains
    why the other two responses
    were not selected, with specific
    clinically relevant resources that
    support the response.
    The response accurately explains
    the outcome the student was

    14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains the decision
    selected.
    The response inaccurately or

    vaguely explains why the
    decision was selected, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that inaccurately or
    vaguely support the decision
    selected.
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains why the other
    two responses were not selected,
    with specific clinically relevant
    resources that inaccurately or

    0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains in detail the
    decision selected.
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains why the
    decision was selected, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that do not support the
    decision selected, or is missing.
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains why the other
    two responses were not selected,
    with specific clinically relevant
    resources that do not support the
    decision selected, or is missing.

    achieve by making this
    decision? Support your
    response with evidence and
    references to the Learning
    Resources (including the
    primary literature).
    • Explain how ethical
    considerations may impact
    your treatment plan and
    communication with patients.
    Be specific and provide
    examples.

    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail the
    outcome the student was hoping
    to achieve with the selected
    decision, with specific clinically
    relevant resources that fully
    support the response.
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail how
    ethical considerations impact the
    treatment plan and
    communication with patients.
    Examples provided fully support
    the decisions and responses
    provided.

    hoping to achieve with the
    selected decision, with specific
    clinically relevant resources that
    support the response.
    The response accurately explains
    how ethical considerations
    impact the treatment plan and
    communication with patients.
    Examples provided support the
    decisions and responses
    provided.

    vaguely support the response.
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains the outcome the
    student was hoping to achieve
    with the selected decision, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that inaccurately or
    vaguely support the response.
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains how ethical
    considerations impact the
    treatment plan and
    communication with patients.
    Examples provided may support
    the decisions and responses
    provided.

    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains the outcome the
    student was hoping to achieve
    with the selected decision, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that do not support the
    response, or is missing.
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains how ethical
    considerations impact the
    treatment plan and
    communication with patients, or
    is missing.
    Examples provided do not
    support the decisions and
    responses provided, or is
    missing.

    Decision #3 (1–2 pages)
    • Which decision did you
    select?
    • Why did you select this
    decision? Be specific and
    support your response with
    clinically relevant and patient-
    specific resources, including
    the primary literature.
    • Why did you not select the
    other two options provided in

    the exercise? Be specific and
    support your response with
    clinically relevant and patient-
    specific resources, including
    the primary literature.
    • What were you hoping to
    achieve by making this
    decision? Support your
    response with evidence and
    references to the Learning
    Resources (including the
    primary literature).
    • Explain how ethical

    18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail the
    decision selected.
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail why the
    decision was selected, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that fully support the
    decision selected.
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail why the
    other two responses were not
    selected, with specific clinically
    relevant resources that fully

    support the response.
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail the
    outcome the student was hoping
    to achieve with the selected
    decision, with specific clinically
    relevant resources that fully

    16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
    The response accurately explains
    the decision selected.
    The response explains why the
    decision was selected, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that support the
    decision selected.
    The response accurately explains
    why the other two responses
    were not selected, with specific
    clinically relevant resources that
    support the response.
    The response accurately explains
    the outcome the student was
    hoping to achieve with the
    selected decision, with specific
    clinically relevant resources that
    support the response.
    The response accurately explains
    how ethical considerations

    14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains the decision
    selected.
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains why the
    decision was selected, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that inaccurately or
    vaguely support the decision
    selected.
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains why the other
    two responses were not selected,
    with specific clinically relevant
    resources that inaccurately or
    vaguely support the response.
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains the outcome the
    student was hoping to achieve
    with the selected decision, with
    specific clinically relevant

    0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains in detail the
    decision selected.
    The response inaccurately and

    vaguely explains why the
    decision was selected, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that do not support the
    decision selected, or is missing.
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains why the other
    two responses were not selected,
    with specific clinically relevant
    resources that do not support the
    decision selected, or is missing.
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains the outcome the
    student was hoping to achieve
    with the selected decision, with
    specific clinically relevant
    resources that do not support the

    considerations may impact
    your treatment plan and
    communication with patients.
    Be specific and provide
    examples.

    support the response.
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains in detail how
    ethical considerations impact the
    treatment plan and

    communication with patients.
    Examples provided fully support
    the decisions and responses
    provided.

    impact the treatment plan and
    communication with patients.
    Examples provided support the
    decisions and responses
    provided.

    resources that inaccurately or
    vaguely support the response.
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains how ethical
    considerations impact the
    treatment plan and
    communication with patients.
    Examples provided may support
    the decisions and responses
    provided.

    response, or is missing.
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains how ethical
    considerations impact the
    treatment plan and
    communication with patients, or
    is missing.

    Examples provided do not
    support the decisions and
    responses provided, or is
    missing.

    Conclusion (1 page)
    • Summarize your
    recommendations on the
    treatment options you selected
    for this patient. Be sure to
    justify your recommendations
    and support your response
    with clinically relevant and
    patient-specific resources,
    including the primary literature.

    14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
    The response accurately and
    clearly summarizes in detail the
    recommendations on the
    treatment options selected for
    this patient.
    The response accurately and
    clearly explains a justification for
    the recommendations provided,
    including clinically relevant
    resources that fully support the
    recommendations provided.

    12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
    The response accurately
    summarizes the
    recommendations on the
    treatment options selected for
    this patient.
    The response accurately explains
    a justification for the
    recommendation provided,
    including clinically relevant
    resources that support the
    recommendations provided.

    11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely summarizes the
    recommendations on the
    treatment options selected for
    this patient.
    The response inaccurately or
    vaguely explains a justification for
    the recommendations provided,
    including clinically relevant
    resources that inaccurately or
    vaguely support the
    recommendations provided.

    0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
    The response inaccurately and

    vaguely summarizes the
    recommendations on the
    treatment options selected for
    this patient, or is missing.
    The response inaccurately and
    vaguely explains a justification for
    the recommendations provided,
    including clinically relevant
    resources that do not support the
    recommendations provided, or is
    missing.

    Written Expression and
    Formatting – Paragraph
    Development and Organization:
    Paragraphs make clear points
    that support well-developed
    ideas, flow logically, and
    demonstrate continuity of
    ideas. Sentences are carefully
    focused—neither long and
    rambling nor short and lacking
    substance. A clear and
    comprehensive purpose
    statement and introduction are
    provided that delineate all
    required criteria.

    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

    Paragraphs and sentences follow
    writing standards for flow,
    continuity, and clarity.
    A clear and comprehensive
    purpose statement, introduction,
    and conclusion are provided that
    delineate all required criteria.

    4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
    Paragraphs and sentences follow
    writing standards for flow,
    continuity, and clarity 80% of the
    time.
    Purpose, introduction, and
    conclusion of the assignment are
    stated, yet they are brief and not
    descriptive.

    3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
    Paragraphs and sentences follow
    writing standards for flow,
    continuity, and clarity 60%–79%
    of the time.
    Purpose, introduction, and
    conclusion of the assignment is
    vague or off topic.

    0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
    Paragraphs and sentences follow

    writing standards for flow,
    continuity, and clarity < 60% of
    the time.
    No purpose statement,
    introduction, or conclusion were
    provided.

    Written Expression and
    Formatting – English writing
    standards:
    Correct grammar, mechanics,
    and proper punctuation

    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
    Uses correct grammar, spelling,
    and punctuation with no errors.

    4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
    Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar,
    spelling, and punctuation errors.

    3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
    Contains several (3 or 4)
    grammar, spelling, and
    punctuation errors.

    0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
    Contains many (≥ 5) grammar,
    spelling, and punctuation errors

    that interfere with the reader’s
    understanding.

    Written Expression and
    Formatting – The paper follows
    correct APA format for title
    page, headings, font,
    spacing, margins, indentations,
    page numbers, parenthetical/in-
    text citations, and reference
    list.

    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
    Uses correct APA format with no
    errors.

    4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
    Contains a few (1 or 2) APA
    format errors.

    3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
    Contains several (3 or 4) APA
    format errors.

    0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
    Contains many (≥ 5) APA format
    errors.

    Total Points: 100

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.