Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

DNP 801 Topic 2 Doctoral Learning Strategies

DNP 801 Topic 2 Doctoral Learning Strategies

The purpose of the assignment is to demonstrate your working knowledge of APA format by writing a paper.

The doctoral Learning process is uniquely autonomous. It is important to develop individual plans for success and use personal strategies to reach your goals.

General Requirements:

  • Review the APA Quiz questions prior to beginning work on your paper.
  • When writing this paper ensure you are speaking from a formal standpoint and are not using I-statements.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  • You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Directions:

In 750-1,000 words, construct a paper that addresses the following.

  1. Discuss learning experiences one may face prior to the doctoral learning experience. Support your discussion with scholarly evidence.
  2. Research the autonomous nature of doctoral learning. Discuss how doctoral programs and learning skills and strategies employed when completing them is different than other learning experience.
  3.  Conduct a literature review of five scholarly articles related to strategies for success in doctoral programs.
  4. Based upon your research discuss specific strategies you recommend when developing a plan for successful completion of a doctoral program.
    DNP 801 Topic 2 Doctoral Learning Strategies

    DNP 801 Topic 2 Doctoral Learning Strategies

    Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:DNP 801 Topic 2 Doctoral Learning Strategies

DNP801.v10R.APASelf-Assessment.docx

Exit

 Grid View
 List View
Excellent
Point range: 90–100

Good
Point range: 80–89

Fair
Point range: 70–79

Poor
Point range: 0–69

Introduction to the case (1
page)
Briefly explain and summarize
the case for this Assignment.
Be sure to include the specific
patient factors that may impact
your decision making when

prescribing medication for this
patient.

9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
The response accurately, clearly,
and fully summarizes in detail the
case for the Assignment.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
specific patient factors that
impact decision making when
prescribing medication for this
patient.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
The response accurately
summarizes the case for the
Assignment.
The response accurately explains
the specific patient factors that
impact decision making with
prescribing medication for this
patient.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
The response inaccurately or
vaguely summarizes the case for
the Assignment.
The response inaccurately or

vaguely explains the specific
patient factors that impact
decision making with prescribing
medication for this patient.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
The response inaccurately and
vaguely summarizes the case for
the Assignment, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains the specific
patient factors that impact
decision making with prescribing
medication for this patient.

Decision #1 (1–2 pages)
• Which decision did you
select?
• Why did you select this
decision? Be specific and
support your response with
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
• Why did you not select the

18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the

decision selected.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that fully support the
decision selected.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately explains
the decision selected.
The response explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that support the
decision selected.
The response accurately explains

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the decision

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.

other two options provided in
the exercise? Be specific and
support your response with
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
• What were you hoping to
achieve by making this
decision? Support your
response with evidence and
references to the Learning
Resources (including the
primary literature).
• Explain how ethical
considerations may impact
your treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Be specific and provide

examples.

The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
other two responses were not
selected, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully
support the response.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
outcome the student was hoping
to achieve with the selected
decision, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully
support the response.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail how
ethical considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided fully support
the decisions and responses
provided.

why the other two responses
were not selected, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains

the outcome the student was
hoping to achieve with the
selected decision, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
how ethical considerations
impact the treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided support the
decisions and responses
provided.

selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains how ethical

considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided may support
the decisions and responses
provided.

The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
response, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients, or
is missing.
Examples provided do not
support the decisions and
responses provided, or is

missing.

Decision #2 (1–2 pages)
• Which decision did you
select?
• Why did you select this
decision? Be specific and
support your response with
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
• Why did you not select the
other two options provided in
the exercise? Be specific and
support your response with
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
• What were you hoping to

18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
decision selected.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that fully support the

decision selected.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
other two responses were not
selected, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully
support the response.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately explains
the decision selected.
The response explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that support the
decision selected.
The response accurately explains
why the other two responses
were not selected, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
the outcome the student was

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately or

vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains in detail the
decision selected.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.

achieve by making this
decision? Support your
response with evidence and
references to the Learning
Resources (including the
primary literature).
• Explain how ethical
considerations may impact
your treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Be specific and provide
examples.

The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
outcome the student was hoping
to achieve with the selected
decision, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully
support the response.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail how
ethical considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided fully support
the decisions and responses
provided.

hoping to achieve with the
selected decision, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
how ethical considerations
impact the treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided support the
decisions and responses
provided.

vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided may support
the decisions and responses
provided.

The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
response, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients, or
is missing.
Examples provided do not
support the decisions and
responses provided, or is
missing.

Decision #3 (1–2 pages)
• Which decision did you
select?
• Why did you select this
decision? Be specific and
support your response with
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
• Why did you not select the
other two options provided in

the exercise? Be specific and
support your response with
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
• What were you hoping to
achieve by making this
decision? Support your
response with evidence and
references to the Learning
Resources (including the
primary literature).
• Explain how ethical

18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
decision selected.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that fully support the
decision selected.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
other two responses were not
selected, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully

support the response.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
outcome the student was hoping
to achieve with the selected
decision, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately explains
the decision selected.
The response explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that support the
decision selected.
The response accurately explains
why the other two responses
were not selected, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
the outcome the student was
hoping to achieve with the
selected decision, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
how ethical considerations

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains in detail the
decision selected.
The response inaccurately and

vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the

considerations may impact
your treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Be specific and provide
examples.

support the response.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail how
ethical considerations impact the
treatment plan and

communication with patients.
Examples provided fully support
the decisions and responses
provided.

impact the treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided support the
decisions and responses
provided.

resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided may support
the decisions and responses
provided.

response, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients, or
is missing.

Examples provided do not
support the decisions and
responses provided, or is
missing.

Conclusion (1 page)
• Summarize your
recommendations on the
treatment options you selected
for this patient. Be sure to
justify your recommendations
and support your response
with clinically relevant and
patient-specific resources,
including the primary literature.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response accurately and
clearly summarizes in detail the
recommendations on the
treatment options selected for
this patient.
The response accurately and
clearly explains a justification for
the recommendations provided,
including clinically relevant
resources that fully support the
recommendations provided.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The response accurately
summarizes the
recommendations on the
treatment options selected for
this patient.
The response accurately explains
a justification for the
recommendation provided,
including clinically relevant
resources that support the
recommendations provided.

11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
The response inaccurately or
vaguely summarizes the
recommendations on the
treatment options selected for
this patient.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains a justification for
the recommendations provided,
including clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the
recommendations provided.

0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
The response inaccurately and

vaguely summarizes the
recommendations on the
treatment options selected for
this patient, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains a justification for
the recommendations provided,
including clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
recommendations provided, or is
missing.

Written Expression and
Formatting – Paragraph
Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points
that support well-developed
ideas, flow logically, and
demonstrate continuity of
ideas. Sentences are carefully
focused—neither long and
rambling nor short and lacking
substance. A clear and
comprehensive purpose
statement and introduction are
provided that delineate all
required criteria.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow
writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive
purpose statement, introduction,
and conclusion are provided that
delineate all required criteria.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow
writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity 80% of the
time.
Purpose, introduction, and
conclusion of the assignment are
stated, yet they are brief and not
descriptive.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow
writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity 60%–79%
of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and
conclusion of the assignment is
vague or off topic.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow

writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity < 60% of
the time.
No purpose statement,
introduction, or conclusion were
provided.

Written Expression and
Formatting – English writing
standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics,
and proper punctuation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling,
and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar,
spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4)
grammar, spelling, and
punctuation errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar,
spelling, and punctuation errors

that interfere with the reader’s
understanding.

Written Expression and
Formatting – The paper follows
correct APA format for title
page, headings, font,
spacing, margins, indentations,
page numbers, parenthetical/in-
text citations, and reference
list.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no
errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA
format errors.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA
format errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format
errors.

Total Points: 100

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.