Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

The purpose of this assignment is to ensure learners have reviewed all expectations in the DNP program.

Review the DNP orientation webinar, DPI milestones, DPI example projects, learner expectations, and APA style guides. After reviewing these resources, sign the “Doctoral Dispositions and Acknowledgement of Review” stating that you have agreed to uphold the doctoral dispositions and comply with the expectations of the program.

Submit the signed form to instructor.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

Doctoral dissertation disposition must include:
a) Dissertation title:
Doctoral dissertation is a result of student’s independent research work at the conclusion of the
study. Students themselves in consultation with the mentor suggest a doctoral dissertation topic.
The topic must relate to the professional and/or scientific field of student’s studies. Topic title
must reflect the content of the dissertation.
b) Topic explanation:
Student under this section explains doctoral thesis topic and highlights the important facts related
to the doctoral dissertation topic. She/he can briefly describe the course of the dissertation
making.
c) The problem, the subject and the research hypotheses:
Student under this section of the doctoral dissertation dispositions defines the field which will be
discussed and from which the problem stems. Problem definition should be precise and clear. It
may also include clarification of the problem dimensions and the importance of its settlement.
Properly defined problem and research subject are for student the basis for setting up a working
hypotheses (research questions). Student in this section also defines the main assumptions or
hypotheses (research questions). Assumptions or hypotheses (research questions) and limitations
present the beginning of dealing with the topic. These assumptions are important because when
dealing with topics it s almost never possible to cover all the factors that define a specific field.
Therefore, student uses assumptions that enable her/him to simplify topic discussion. Student
assumes that many factors of the problem do not change which makes it easier since the student
can further focus narrowly on the field in question or even on an individual case. Assumptions or
hypotheses must be clearly defined.
Limitations in addressing the problem may also be included in the doctoral thesis. As restrictions a
student may also indicate problems due to limited information access, commercial or state
secrets, the lack of scientific literature, the unwillingness of the responsible people for the cooperation etc.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP 801 DOCTORAL DISPOSITIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF REVIEW

d) Research purpose and objectives:
The aim of doctoral dissertation basically emerges from the problem and means a search for the
answer to the basic hypothesis (research question). Student in the dissertation explains the
purpose of the proposed problem and answers the question of why she/he is analyzing the
selected topic. Purposes may be different and stem from the problem with which the student
deals during dissertation writing but they must answer the set question what will with the
proposed research change in the discussed discipline.
The objectives of the doctoral dissertation say what student must complete in order to achieve the
purpose of the research. There can be more objectives and a student can also have several sub-
DOCTORAL DISSERTATION – Disposition preparation and topic application
4
objectives. It is advisable for student to ask questions to which during the course of research,
formulation and written research results presentation she/he will be able to give justified answers.
e) Previous research assessment:
Under this section the student seeks to integrate previous research work that are related to the
doctoral dissertation topic. The research may include publications, documentary events, statistics,
monographs, papers, etc. Student can highlight how her/his thesis will differ from previous
research.

DNP 801 DOCTORAL DISPOSITIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF REVIEW

DNP 801 DOCTORAL DISPOSITIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF REVIEW

f) Research methods:
In the doctoral dissertation disposition student must also indicate the methods for achieving the
objectives of the doctoral dissertation. Using the anticipated methods the student will try to solve
the problem and the research subject and prove the raised working hypothesis (research
question). The student often uses a single main scientific research method and in addition also a
number of other methods regarded as auxiliary can be used. It is not enough to simply enumerate
methods but the scope and application for each method should be recorded as well.
g) Concise outline of the anticipated chapters:
Student under this section briefly describes the table of contents (headings and subheadings).
h) Expected research results:
Student under this disposition section indicates the expected research results with which she/he
should contribute to the understanding of certain findings.
i) Expected science and profession contribution:
Student under this disposition section indicates the major research results that will contribute to
the science and profession.
j) Research results usage:
Student under this section briefly identifies the opportunities to use the research results.
k) Core literature and sources (at least 100 units):
Under final disposition section the student lists all sources and literature (separately). Doctoral
dissertation disposition should contain approximately 100 units of literature. The emphasis should
be on foreign and original literature.
l) Student information (curriculum vitae) with an emphasis on the student’s scientific
development;
m) Student’s bibliography.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP 801 DOCTORAL DISPOSITIONS AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF REVIEW

 Grid View
 List View
Excellent
Point range: 90–100

Good
Point range: 80–89

Fair
Point range: 70–79

Poor
Point range: 0–69

Introduction to the case (1
page)
Briefly explain and summarize
the case for this Assignment.
Be sure to include the specific
patient factors that may impact
your decision making when

prescribing medication for this
patient.

9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
The response accurately, clearly,
and fully summarizes in detail the
case for the Assignment.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
specific patient factors that
impact decision making when
prescribing medication for this
patient.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
The response accurately
summarizes the case for the
Assignment.
The response accurately explains
the specific patient factors that
impact decision making with
prescribing medication for this
patient.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
The response inaccurately or
vaguely summarizes the case for
the Assignment.
The response inaccurately or

vaguely explains the specific
patient factors that impact
decision making with prescribing
medication for this patient.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
The response inaccurately and
vaguely summarizes the case for
the Assignment, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains the specific
patient factors that impact
decision making with prescribing
medication for this patient.

Decision #1 (1–2 pages)
• Which decision did you
select?
• Why did you select this
decision? Be specific and
support your response with
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
• Why did you not select the

18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the

decision selected.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that fully support the
decision selected.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately explains
the decision selected.
The response explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that support the
decision selected.
The response accurately explains

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the decision

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.

other two options provided in
the exercise? Be specific and
support your response with
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
• What were you hoping to
achieve by making this
decision? Support your
response with evidence and
references to the Learning
Resources (including the
primary literature).
• Explain how ethical
considerations may impact
your treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Be specific and provide

examples.

The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
other two responses were not
selected, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully
support the response.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
outcome the student was hoping
to achieve with the selected
decision, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully
support the response.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail how
ethical considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided fully support
the decisions and responses
provided.

why the other two responses
were not selected, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains

the outcome the student was
hoping to achieve with the
selected decision, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
how ethical considerations
impact the treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided support the
decisions and responses
provided.

selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains how ethical

considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided may support
the decisions and responses
provided.

The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
response, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients, or
is missing.
Examples provided do not
support the decisions and
responses provided, or is

missing.

Decision #2 (1–2 pages)
• Which decision did you
select?
• Why did you select this
decision? Be specific and
support your response with
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
• Why did you not select the
other two options provided in
the exercise? Be specific and
support your response with
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
• What were you hoping to

18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
decision selected.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that fully support the

decision selected.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
other two responses were not
selected, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully
support the response.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately explains
the decision selected.
The response explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that support the
decision selected.
The response accurately explains
why the other two responses
were not selected, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
the outcome the student was

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately or

vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains in detail the
decision selected.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.

achieve by making this
decision? Support your
response with evidence and
references to the Learning
Resources (including the
primary literature).
• Explain how ethical
considerations may impact
your treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Be specific and provide
examples.

The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
outcome the student was hoping
to achieve with the selected
decision, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully
support the response.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail how
ethical considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided fully support
the decisions and responses
provided.

hoping to achieve with the
selected decision, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
how ethical considerations
impact the treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided support the
decisions and responses
provided.

vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided may support
the decisions and responses
provided.

The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
response, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients, or
is missing.
Examples provided do not
support the decisions and
responses provided, or is
missing.

Decision #3 (1–2 pages)
• Which decision did you
select?
• Why did you select this
decision? Be specific and
support your response with
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
• Why did you not select the
other two options provided in

the exercise? Be specific and
support your response with
clinically relevant and patient-
specific resources, including
the primary literature.
• What were you hoping to
achieve by making this
decision? Support your
response with evidence and
references to the Learning
Resources (including the
primary literature).
• Explain how ethical

18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
decision selected.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that fully support the
decision selected.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail why the
other two responses were not
selected, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully

support the response.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail the
outcome the student was hoping
to achieve with the selected
decision, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response accurately explains
the decision selected.
The response explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that support the
decision selected.
The response accurately explains
why the other two responses
were not selected, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
the outcome the student was
hoping to achieve with the
selected decision, with specific
clinically relevant resources that
support the response.
The response accurately explains
how ethical considerations

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the decision
selected.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains in detail the
decision selected.
The response inaccurately and

vaguely explains why the
decision was selected, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains why the other
two responses were not selected,
with specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
decision selected, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains the outcome the
student was hoping to achieve
with the selected decision, with
specific clinically relevant
resources that do not support the

considerations may impact
your treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Be specific and provide
examples.

support the response.
The response accurately and
clearly explains in detail how
ethical considerations impact the
treatment plan and

communication with patients.
Examples provided fully support
the decisions and responses
provided.

impact the treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided support the
decisions and responses
provided.

resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the response.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients.
Examples provided may support
the decisions and responses
provided.

response, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains how ethical
considerations impact the
treatment plan and
communication with patients, or
is missing.

Examples provided do not
support the decisions and
responses provided, or is
missing.

Conclusion (1 page)
• Summarize your
recommendations on the
treatment options you selected
for this patient. Be sure to
justify your recommendations
and support your response
with clinically relevant and
patient-specific resources,
including the primary literature.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response accurately and
clearly summarizes in detail the
recommendations on the
treatment options selected for
this patient.
The response accurately and
clearly explains a justification for
the recommendations provided,
including clinically relevant
resources that fully support the
recommendations provided.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The response accurately
summarizes the
recommendations on the
treatment options selected for
this patient.
The response accurately explains
a justification for the
recommendation provided,
including clinically relevant
resources that support the
recommendations provided.

11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
The response inaccurately or
vaguely summarizes the
recommendations on the
treatment options selected for
this patient.
The response inaccurately or
vaguely explains a justification for
the recommendations provided,
including clinically relevant
resources that inaccurately or
vaguely support the
recommendations provided.

0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
The response inaccurately and

vaguely summarizes the
recommendations on the
treatment options selected for
this patient, or is missing.
The response inaccurately and
vaguely explains a justification for
the recommendations provided,
including clinically relevant
resources that do not support the
recommendations provided, or is
missing.

Written Expression and
Formatting – Paragraph
Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points
that support well-developed
ideas, flow logically, and
demonstrate continuity of
ideas. Sentences are carefully
focused—neither long and
rambling nor short and lacking
substance. A clear and
comprehensive purpose
statement and introduction are
provided that delineate all
required criteria.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow
writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive
purpose statement, introduction,
and conclusion are provided that
delineate all required criteria.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow
writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity 80% of the
time.
Purpose, introduction, and
conclusion of the assignment are
stated, yet they are brief and not
descriptive.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow
writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity 60%–79%
of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and
conclusion of the assignment is
vague or off topic.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow

writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity < 60% of
the time.
No purpose statement,
introduction, or conclusion were
provided.

Written Expression and
Formatting – English writing
standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics,
and proper punctuation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling,
and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar,
spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4)
grammar, spelling, and
punctuation errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar,
spelling, and punctuation errors

that interfere with the reader’s
understanding.

Written Expression and
Formatting – The paper follows
correct APA format for title
page, headings, font,
spacing, margins, indentations,
page numbers, parenthetical/in-
text citations, and reference
list.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no
errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA
format errors.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA
format errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format
errors.

Total Points: 100

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.