Boost your Grades with us today!
Sample Answer for DNP 8000 Assignment Becoming Familiar With the DNP Scholarly Project and PhD Dissertation Included After Question
DNP 8000 Assignment Becoming Familiar With the DNP Scholarly Project and PhD Dissertation
Assignment: Becoming Familiar with the DNP Scholarly Project and PhD Dissertation
The successful completion of the DNP project or dissertation will entail the consideration of a number of steps as well as outline. One of the steps is brainstorming researchable ideas. Brainstorming enables the identification of critical issues in nursing practice that can be addressed through DNP project or dissertation. The second step is performing literature review where one critiques the existing evidence to identify gaps that the DNP project should address. The third step entails the presentation of the proposal to the faculty team (Roush, 2019). The project or dissertation development follows once the proposal is approved. The step that follows is the submission of the project for institutional review board approval. The approval leads to data collection from the participants or subjects in a project or dissertation. Data analysis is the next step to determine the impact of the project. The DNP nurse presents data and its implications to the institutional committee for approval. One then graduates after completing the above processes (Moran et al., 2019). The area of interest for DNP scholarly project is reducing catheter-associated urinary tract infections among hospitalized patients. The expected timeline for completing the project is six months.
I will use scholarly sources of evidence to complete the DNP project or dissertation. The scholarly sources will include journals, books, government websites and websites of authoritative organizations such as the World Health Organization. The documents will provide evidence-based information that relate to the focus of the project or dissertation (Bradshaw & Vitale, 2020). The guide document by Walden University will be used in undertaking the project or dissertation activities. The document provides guidelines on the expected deliverables that the students must achieve in the project.
References
Bradshaw, M., & Vitale, T. (2020). The Dnp Project Workbook: A Step-By-Step Process for Success. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated.
Moran, K. J., Burson, R., & Conrad, D. (2019). The Doctor of Nursing Practice Project. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Roush, K. (2019). A Nurse’s Step-By-Step Guide to Publishing a Dissertation or DNP Project. Sigma.
A Sample Answer For the Assignment: DNP 8000 Assignment Becoming Familiar With the DNP Scholarly Project and PhD Dissertation
Title: DNP 8000 Assignment Becoming Familiar With the DNP Scholarly Project and PhD Dissertation
DNP 8000 Assignment Becoming Familiar With the DNP Scholarly Project and PhD Dissertation
Becoming Familiar with the DNP Scholarly Project and PhD Dissertation
The purpose of a DNP scholarly project is to translate evidence-based research into nursing practice. DNP students can use the scholarly project to prove their ability to lead and practice at the highest level of clinical nursing practice (Hande & Phillippi, 2018). My DNP project will focus on geriatrics. I would be interested in a project on a nurse-led Dementia prevention program for community-dwelling older adults.
The first step in the DNP project will be to identify a practice problem and a practice gap, identify a chair, and select the approach and DNP practicum manual type. The second step will be to develop a prospectus and upload it for review by the committee and approval by the program’s director (Walden University, 2018). After approval, I will work on the proposal’s sections 1-3 and regularly submit it to the faculty for feedback. After that, I will present the proposal to my chair for approval and upload the proposal to the Preliminary committee for Rubric Analysis and the committee Rubric analysis for a formal review.
IRB application for form A will begin after committee approval and submission of the proposal to URR. The next step will be an oral presentation, which I will conduct using a PowerPoint presentation (Walden University, 2018). Afterward, I will complete the subsequent steps in line with my proposal and the approved IRB, including data collection as per the project. Upon completing the DNP project, I will upload it to the preliminary section in MYDR chair and then to the committee on Rubric Analysis.
In year one of the DNP program, I will develop the prospectus and complete sections 1 and 2 of the proposal. In year two, I will complete section 3, meet with the committee, complete IRB approval, and defend the project proposal. In the final year, I will collect data and complete the final project scholarly manuscript. I will also defend the final project, work on revisions on the final manuscript, and submit the final project’s document to the Knowledge Bank with permission from the chair.
The documents that I will use for the DNP scholarly project include the DNP Project Process Guide, DNP practicum manual, DNP Prospectus guide and rubric, DNP Minimum Standards Rubric, and DNP Final Quality Rubric. For oral presentations, I will use the DNP Proposal Defense PowerPoint Template and Final Defense PowerPoint Template.
References
Hande, K., & Phillippi, J. C. (2018). DNP Project Timeline Template: A Guide for Successful Completion. Nurse educator, 43(3), 115–116. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000472
Walden University. (2018, May). Academic guides: Capstone documents: DNP doctoral project. Welcome – Walden University Departments & Centers – Academic Guides at Walden University. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/research-center/program-documents/dnp
Assignment: Becoming Familiar With the DNP Scholarly Project and PhD Dissertation
As a doctoral candidate, you will complete either a DNP Scholarly Project or a PhD Dissertation. Are you curious about what will be required of you? For this Assignment, you locate and read materials that pertain to your doctoral program at Walden University, and begin thinking about your DNP Scholarly Project or PhD Dissertation.
To prepare:
DNP students:
- Review the DNP section of the Walden University website (http://researchcenter.waldenu.edu/DNP-Doctoral-Study-Program.htm.
- Carefully review the requirements for the DNP Scholarly Project process.
- Consider the steps and timeline you will work through to complete the DNP Scholarly project.
PhD students:
- Review the information presented at the Walden University Writing Center PhD Dissertation website (http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/549.htm).
- Carefully review the requirements for the Premise, Prospectus, and Dissertation process.
- Consider the steps you will work through to complete the Premise, Prospectus, and Dissertation process and the timeline for completing each step.
To complete:
Write a 1-page paper outlining the steps, timeline for completing the project / dissertation, and the documents you will use for either the DNP Scholarly Project or the PhD Dissertation. Include the main guide document that identifies the processes and procedures for the appropriate doctoral project.
DNP students:
- Summarize the purpose of the DNP Scholarly Project.
- Briefly describe a project that would be of interest to you and how you might go about completing that project.
Due by Day 7 of Week 5.
Week in Review
This week, you evaluated professional opportunities for intra- and interdisciplinary collaborative practice available to nurses with a doctoral degree.
Next week, you will explore the various resources provided by Walden University to assist you in becoming a critical and scholarly reader, thinker, and writer.
The Assignment that you began working on in Week 3 is due by Day 7 of this week.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK5Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
- Click the Week 5 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
- Click the Week 5 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK5Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
- Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 5 Assignment draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 5
To submit your Assignment:
Week 5 Assignment
DNP 8000 Assignment Becoming Familiar With the DNP Scholarly Project and PhD Dissertation Grading Rubric
Performance Category | 100% or highest level of performance
100% 16 points |
Very good or high level of performance
88% 14 points |
Acceptable level of performance
81% 13 points |
Inadequate demonstration of expectations
68% 11 points |
Deficient level of performance
56% 9 points
|
Failing level
of performance 55% or less 0 points |
Total Points Possible= 50 | 16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points |
Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics. |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements
|
16 Points | 14 Points | 13 Points | 11 Points | 9 Points | 0 Points | |
Application of Course Knowledge
Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:
|
Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements
|
10 Points | 9 Points | 6 Points | 0 Points | |||
Interactive Dialogue
Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic. |
Demonstrated all of the following:
|
Demonstrated 3 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 2 of the following:
|
Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:
|
||
8 Points | 7 Points | 6 Points | 5 Points | 4 Points | 0 Points | |
Grammar, Syntax, APA
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error. |
The following was present:
AND
AND
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
The following was present:
AND/OR
AND/OR
|
0 Points Deducted | 5 Points Lost | |||||
Participation
Requirements |
Demonstrated the following:
|
Failed to demonstrate the following:
|
||||
0 Points Lost | 5 Points Lost | |||||
Due Date Requirements | Demonstrated all of the following:
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Demonstrates one or less of the following.
A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. |
Read Also: NURS 8302 WEEK 11 Discussion Evaluating and Sustaining Change INSTRUCTIONS PLUS RUBRIC