Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

discussion response 2 Medical error

discussion response 2 Medical error

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: discussion response 2 Medical error

Description

Medical error is a preventable adverse effect of medical care, whether there is harm to patient or not. For example, adverse drug event, over or under treatment of patient, wrong site surgery, suicide, restraint related injury or death, fall, burn, pressure injury. A medical error is often associated with extremes of age, severity of medical condition being treated. It is important for the entire healthcare team to work with goal of lowering medical errors, including pharmacist, nurse, physician (Carver et al., 2022). Medical errors not only effect the patient but also lead to medical malpractice litigation. Awareness of every member of the healthcare team is the only way to reduce medical errors.

Good catch is defined as an event that might have caused harm but was prevented from reaching the patient due to active effort of caregiver or by chance. A good catch is estimated to occur up to 100 times more frequently than serious events but are often under reported (Wallace et al., 2017). Reporting good catches can improve patient safety by allowing the healthcare department to analyze gaps and proactively make changes to patient care process to improve patient safety.

Example of medical error:

It was a busy evening in the emergency department. The physician was going room to room performing assessments, placing orders, reviewing patient’s labs and imaging reports, getting updates from nurses and trying to manage their documentation and discharge patients as able to. A patient was in with chief complaint of dental pain and physician talked to patient regarding a dental block to provide temporary relief of pain. The physician left room, obtained supplies needed and administered dental block. Sounds reasonable…. right…the provider entered the wrong room and administered the dental block to the wrong patient. This raises many questions especially why the wrong patient would open their mouth for a dental block and not question what was happening as they were not there for dental pain. This prompted a review of which patients receive time out process.

Using a time out is an evidence-based practice to reduce wrong site and wrong patient procedure or surgery from occurring. A time out requires confirmation of correct patient, correct side and site, agreement of procedure to be performed and availability of needed equipment and supplies. Time out must be performed with patient and nurse after consent is reviewed by provider and signed by patient, and prior to beginning of the procedure (Feldman, 2008).

References

Carver, N., Gupta, V., & Hipskind, J. E. (2022). Medical error. In Stat Pearls. Stat Pearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430763/

Feldman, D. L. (2008). The inside of a time out. Patient Safety Networkhttps://psnet.ahrq.gov/web-mm/inside-time-out

Wallace, S. C., Mamrol, C., Finley, E., & Wallace, S. C. (2017). Promote a culture of safety with good catch reports. Patient Safety Authority14(3). http://patientsafety.pa.gov/ADVISORIES/Pages/201709_goodcatch.aspx

  • Participation: RN-to-BSNIn discussions, you, as a student, will interact with your instructor and classmates to explore topics related to the content of this course. You will be graded for the following.
    1. Attendance

    Discussions (graded): Discussions are a critical learning experience in the online classroom. Participation in all discussions is required.

    1. Guidelines and Rubric for Discussions

    PURPOSE: Threaded discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In the discussions students:

    • Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week
    • Integrate scholarly resources
    • Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates
    • Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

    Participation Requirement: You are required to post a minimum of three (3) times in each graded discussion. These three (3) posts must be on a minimum of two (2) separate days. You must respond to the initial discussion question by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday.

    Participation points: It is expected that you will meet the minimum participation requirement described above. If not:

    • You will receive a 10% point deduction in a thread if your response to the initial question is not posted by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday
    • You will also receive a 10% point deduction in a thread if you do not post at least three (3) times in each thread on at least two (2) separate days.
    1. Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles

    The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

    1. Participation Guidelines

    You are required to post a minimum of three (3) times in each graded discussion. These three (3) posts must be on a minimum of two (2) separate days. You must respond to the initial discussion question by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday. Discussions for each week close on Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Mountain Time (MT). To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. For courses with Week 8 graded discussions, the threads will close on Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT. All discussion requirements must be met by that deadline

    1. Grading Rubric

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: discussion response 2 Medical error

discussion response 2 Medical error

discussion response 2 Medical error

  • Discussion Criteria  A
    (100%)
    Outstanding or highest level of performance 
    B
    (87%)
    Very good or high level of performance
    C
    (76%)
    Competent or satisfactory level of performance
    F
    (0)
    Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performance
    Answers the initial graded threaded discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of concepts for the week.
    16 points
    Addresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding regarding all weekly concepts.

    16 points

    Addresses most aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of most of the weekly concepts.

    14 points

    Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of some of the weekly concepts.

    12 points

    Minimally addresses the initial discussion question(s) or does not address the initial question(s).

    0 points

    Integrates evidence to support discussion. Sources are credited.*
    ( APA format not required)
    12 points
    Integrates evidence to support your discussion from:

    • assigned readings** OR online lessons, AND
    • at least one outside scholarly source.***

    Sources are credited.*

    12 points

    Integrates evidence to support discussion from:

    • assigned readings OR online lesson.

    Sources are credited.*

    10 points

    Integrates evidence to support discussion only from an outside source with no mention of assigned reading or lesson.

    Sources are credited.*

    9 points

    Does not integrate any evidence.

    0 points

    Engages in meaningful dialogue with classmates or instructor before the end of the week.
    14 points
    Responds to a classmate and/or instructor’s post furthering the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion.

    14 points

    Responds to a classmate and/or instructor furthering the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion.

    12 points

    Responds to a classmate and/or instructor but does not further the discussion.

    10 points

    No response post to another student or instructor.

    0 points

    Communicates in a professional manner.
    8 points
    Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

    8 points

    Presents information in an organized manner (few errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

    7 points

    Presents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

    6 points

    Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).

    0 points

    PARTICIPATION:
    Response to initial question: Responds to initial discussion question(s) by
    Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. M.T.
    0 points lost

    Student posts an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p . m. MT.

    -5 points

    Student does not post an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p . m. MT.

    PARTICIPATION
    Total posts: Participates in the discussion thread at least three times on at least two different days.
    0 points lost

    Posts in the discussion at least three times AND on two different days.

    -5 points

    Posts fewer than three times OR does not participate on at least two different days.

    NOTES:
    * Credited means stating where the information came from (specific article, text, or lesson). Examples: Our text discusses…. The information from our lesson states…, Smith (2010) claimed that…, Mary Manners (personal communication, November 17, 2011)…. APA formatting is not required.
    ** Assigned readings are those listed on the syllabus or assignments page as required reading. This may include text readings, required articles, or required websites.
    *** Scholarly source – per the APA Guidelines in Course Resources, only scholarly sources should be used in assignments. These include peer reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Wikipedia, Wikis, .com website or blogs should not be used as anyone can add to these. For the discussions, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. Outside sources do not include assigned required readings.
    NOTE: A zero is the lowest score that a student can be assign

    Also Read: Research Article Upload #2 Assignment

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.