You excellently discussed dissemination strategies in this post. There is much useful information that will be helpful in further research. In this post, you presented information about organizational-level presentations and peer-reviewed journals. Dissemination of exploration is significant for growing the group of information identified with geriatric restoration. Meeting presentations and journal distributions are customary methods for sharing examination discoveries with different experts. Scholastic clinicians incorporate clinical educators and their groups, and different clinicians effectively included, for the most part, in clinical examination (Ross-Hellauer & Vignoli, 2020). It gives the expected advantages of exploration to a wide scope of people and associations, including different analysts, purchasers, industry, strategy producers, and the more extensive network. It likewise satisfies commitments to financing bodies. Dissemination remembers revealing of examination for scholarly journals or books, meeting presentations, inventive works, pages, and proficient and institutional archives. You presented much useful information. Other students should read this post.
References
Ross-Hellauer, T., & Vignoli, M. (2020). Ten simple rules for innovative dissemination of research. PLoS Comput, Biol.
A Sample Answer 5 For the Assignment: Discussion: Developing a Culture of Evidence-Based Practice NURS 6052
Title: Discussion: Developing a Culture of Evidence-Based Practice NURS 6052
Evidence-based practice (EBP) projects are laborious endeavors and should trigger significant (positive) health care outcomes. Since most EBP projects profoundly impact organizational processes and patient care, their results should be shared to promote practice change within and outside the organization. Dissemination seeks to share EBP results with targeted audiences, particularly health care providers. The choice of dissemination strategies depends on the type of EBP project, resources, and situation, among other factors.
I would be most inclined to use organizational-level presentations and educational materials to communicate EBP. An organizational-level presentation is easy to organize since the target audience can be reached quickly and comfortably. A presentation also offers an excellent opportunity for debates and consultation as the audience seeks clarification for unclear areas. Education materials, electronic or print, can promote cross-cultural communication (Brooks et al., 2019). The information can be customized according to the target group’s unique characteristics, particularly language. I would be less inclined to use podium presentations and information publication in peer-reviewed journals. It is challenging to get an opportunity for presentation, and access to peer-reviewed journals limits the size of readership (Burke & Fiedler, 2018). However, publication can be considered later.
EBP projects face many dissemination barriers. The most typical in organizational-level presentations is inadequate resources since such presentations require large rooms, information technologies, reading and writing materials, and facilitators (Huber & Joseph, 2021). Health care providers also have busy schedules implying that attending presentations would interfere with their daily practice. Although they promote cross-cultural communication, education materials can be costly, particularly when required in volumes and print. Both challenges can be addressed by engaging the management early and throughout the project. As a major stakeholder, the management supports EBP projects through resource facilitation (Bach-Mortensen et al., 2018). As a result, early and continuous engagement would ensure that the management understands the details of the EBP project and is ready to offer human and financial support. Printed educational materials can be replaced with electronic versions of the same.
References
Bach-Mortensen, A. M., Lange, B. C., & Montgomery, P. (2018). Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based interventions among third sector organisations: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 13(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0789-7
Brooks, L. A., Manias, E., & Bloomer, M. J. (2019). Culturally sensitive communication in healthcare: A concept analysis. Collegian, 26(3), 383-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2018.09.007
Burke, J., & Fiedler, G. (2018).Clinicians’ access to peer-reviewed prosthetics research articles. Canadian Prosthetics & Orthotics Journal, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.33137/cpoj.v1i1.30009
Huber, D., & Joseph, M. L. (2021). Leadership and nursing care management-e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences.
A Sample Answer 6 For the Assignment: Discussion: Developing a Culture of Evidence-Based Practice NURS 6052
Title: Discussion: Developing a Culture of Evidence-Based Practice NURS 6052
Evidence-based practice focus on essential elements that can help create a highly integrated environment where it is possible to attain better outcomes. The evidence-based practice focuses on a specific problem where the findings can be compared with other results previously obtained. Dissemination of evidence-based practice findings can be evaluated based on different settings, mainly where the practice will be applied. The work of evidence-based practice (EBP) is a stringent process that requires practitioners to continuously provide evidence in support of their decision-making process and policy/practice changes. Healthcare workers may use the EBP model to initiate and implement policy changes that will improve patient care. During the procedure, practitioners must present their appeals to the lawmakers, providing evidence of why the changes happen. There are several ways of disseminating the evidence. Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt (2018) define dissemination as “the process of distributing or circulating information widely.”
Two dissemination strategies that I would be most inclined to use
The best dissemination strategies that I would consider are unit-level presentations and local dissemination (Harvey & Kitson, 2015). Unit-level dissemination is only successful, especially in ensuring where the issue has been considered to improve the underlying problem within the unit. Different units with a given setting can have a varied assessment of the operational environment. This means that there is a need to take into consideration the context under which the evidence-based practice. Therefore, ensuring that the engagement is strategic help ensure that based on the results, the intervention that is put in place is unit-based (Brownson et al., 2018). Organizations strive to implement essential aspects of improving their performance. However, evidence-based practice eliminated the uncertainty risk, which is crucial in attaining better outcomes.
Local dissemination entails significant players at the local level, which is a better aspect that helps provide a strong emphasis on institutional development (Hall & Roussel, 2016). However, it is essential to ensure that the dissemination of outcomes is done in an environment where there exist resources and technical ability to attain better results. Skills and knowledge among the population are likely to be a challenge in successfully implementing the developed practice. There is a need to manage the needs of existing stakeholders, which is essential and helps in organizational planning and service delivery. The implementation of evidence-based practice should create a profoundly transformed environment where it is easier to implement positive change. Therefore, training is crucial in empowering stakeholders to implement evidence-based practice (Brownson et al., 2018).
Least Inclined Dissemination Strategies to be used
The least inclined dissemination strategies to be used in communicating EBP are poster presentations and podium presentations. The poster presentations may not give enough information, and the display may not look engaging and exciting, thereby losing the exhibition’s aim. The podium presentation, on the other hand, may encounter a low turnout of participants. There could be poor publicity of the expression leading to low attendance.
Barriers to be Encountered and Overcoming These Barriers
The barrier that could expect from the unit level presentation is the lack of interest from staff. An example is staff resistance when a change is to be implemented that they do not like or want. One way to overcome this barrier is by getting staff involved in the presentation. For instance, they are making a member of the team one of the speakers at the exhibition. In that way, they will be very interested in their presentation. The barrier that could be encountered in using peer-reviewed journals is the lack of access to the journals. An example are journals that mandates a subscription fee, which often puts off many readers. One way to overcome this barrier is by giving such journals free access to online readers.
References
Brownson, R. C., Colditz, G. A., & Proctor, E. K. (Eds.). (2018). Dissemination and implementation research in health: translating science to practice. Oxford University Press.
Hall, H. R., & Roussel, L. A. (Eds.). (2016). Evidence-based practice. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
Harvey, G., & Kitson, A. (2015). Implementing evidence-based practice in healthcare: a facilitation guide. Routledge.
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer
A Sample Answer 7 For the Assignment: Discussion: Developing a Culture of Evidence-Based Practice NURS 6052
Title: Discussion: Developing a Culture of Evidence-Based Practice NURS 6052
Great post! I love going to conferences and hearing colleagues discussed new information or experiences they have encountered at their organization. These conferences provide education, sharpen skills, gives us the ability to interact with peers, and try new equipment which leads to improvement in health-care delivery, and patient outcomes. (Mishra, S, 2016).
Sometimes, we may think that our place of work is the only one going through an issue, when, it happens more often, but not discussed. At conferences, I learn about issues, or techniques that are being used or no longer in use and the nurses elaborate as to why. Their input is valuable, and gives us as a whole a much clearer understanding.
Publishing an article is another great dissemination strategy. Writing for a publication allows you to contribute to nursing practice and help build nursing and healthcare knowledge. Clinical articles aim to help nurses understand the clinical presentation and progression of a disease or health issue and the subsequent care for a specific patient population.
The nursing literature serves as a primary means of communicating new knowledge to nurses and should provide some discussion about the nursing perspective and nurses’ contributions to these health care initiatives. It is important not to lose our nursing perspective. (Oerman et al, 2019). Journal articles, websites, books, and other publications provide our primary means of communicating this knowledge and new information to others.
I concur with you about forcefully implementing the evidence-based practice intervention in the organization without informing or involving the other organizational stakeholders. This is a recipe for disaster, lack of support, an unwillingness to learn and implement, and dissatisfaction among leaders, nurses and other stakeholders.
References
Mishra S.(2016). Do medical conferences have a role to play? Sharpen the saw. Indian Heart J. 68(2):111-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2016.03.011. PMID: 27133315; PMCID: PMC4867024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4867024/
Links to an external site.
Oermann, M, Chinn, P, Carter-Templeton, H, Nicoll, L. (2019). The Importance of Nursing in Nursing Publications. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-4910.2019.tb00043.x
A Sample Answer 8 For the Assignment: Discussion: Developing a Culture of Evidence-Based Practice NURS 6052
Title: Discussion: Developing a Culture of Evidence-Based Practice NURS 6052
Countless research studies have shown that evidence-based practice in healthcare has proven to improve the standard of healthcare and patient care outcomes (Chien, 2019). Dissemination or distribution of information gathered from evidence-based practice depends on a carefully planned communication process, one that involves a targeted audience and the vital info that needs to be shared (NHMRC, n.d.). Selecting the right channel to communicate is crucial and should consider the stakeholders in the process (NHMRC, n.d.).
According to Curtis et al., the knowledge-to-action cycle consists of seven steps which are: (1) identifying the problem and conducting relevant research, (2) adapting the research to local context, (3) assessing barriers to using knowledge, (4) tailoring the interventions, (5) monitoring the knowledge use, (6) evaluating the outcomes and finally (7) sustaining the knowledge use (2017).
With the technological advancements of our modern-day world, we live in a world that is heavily focused and dependent on social media. This would be one of the ways that I would choose to distribute information. Social media platforms provide an excellent alternative to face-to-face discussions, which can allow people to access those on their own time and be connected (Khan et al., 2021). Social media runs on state-of-the-art technology at the speed of light and would be great for reaching a larger group of people.
Another one I think would be useful is doing workshops and seminars/webinars. Short courses offered through workshops and seminars are a good way of getting communication out, and a great hands-on way to learn and demonstrate knowledge (Prevention Research Center in St Louis, n.d.).
I think one of the worst ways that information can be disseminated is when the administration in an organization makes rules and guidelines and forces those on stakeholders without getting their feedback. I had this unfortunate experience at one of my previous jobs and it made it a very challenging work environment.
Grading Rubric Guidelines DQ
| Performance Category |
10 |
9 |
8 |
4 |
0 |
| Scholarliness
Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions. |
- Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
- Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
- Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
|
- Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
- Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
- Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
|
- Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
- Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
- Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
- Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
|
- Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
- Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
- The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
|
- No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
- Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
|
| Performance Category |
10 |
9 |
8 |
4 |
0 |
| Application of Course Knowledge –
Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations |
- Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
- Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
|
- Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
- Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
- Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
|
- Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
- Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
- Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
|
- Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
- Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
- Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
|
- Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
- No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
|
| Performance Category |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
0 |
| Interactive Dialogue
Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.
(5 points possible per graded thread) |
- Exceeds minimum post requirements
- Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
- Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
- Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
|
- Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
- Replies to a question posed by a peer
Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week. |
- Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
- The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
- Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
|
- Has only one post for the week
- Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
|
- Does not post to the thread
- No connections are made to the topic
|
| Minus 1 Point |
Minus 2 Point |
Minus 3 Point |
Minus 4 Point |
Minus 5 Point |
| Grammar, Syntax, APA
Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.
Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.
The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition |
- 2-3 errors in APA format.
- Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
- Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
|
- 4-5 errors in APA format.
- Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
- Writing style is somewhat focused.
|
- 6-7 errors in APA format.
- Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
- Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
|
- 8-10 errors in APA format.
- Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
- Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
|
- Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
- Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
- Writing style does not facilitate communication.
- The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
|
|
0 points lost |
-5 points lost |
| Total Participation Requirements
per discussion thread |
The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. |
|
|
|
The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days |
| Early Participation Requirement
per discussion thread |
The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. |
|
|
|
The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT. |
WEEKLY RESOURCES
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and reflect on the various strategies presented throughout
the course that may be helpful in disseminating effective and widely cited EBP.
o This may include: unit-level or organizational-level presentations, poster
presentations, and podium presentations at organizational, local, regional, state,
and national levels, as well as publication in peer-reviewed journals.
Reflect on which type of dissemination strategy you might use to communicate EBP.
