Discussion 5.1: Enterprise Data Management and Analytics NUR 752

Sample Answer for Discussion 5.1: Enterprise Data Management and Analytics NUR 752 Included After Question

Discussion 5.1

This post will evaluate the readiness of my facility’s keenness to advance with a strategic information plan to use enterprise data being collected with the enterprise data management using the reporting and analytics program, E-DRAP (McBride & Tietze, 2019). The E-DRAP framework contains three main components. The first is the reporting and analytics sections which comprise the business intelligence (BI), the BI library, key performance indicator (KPI), and KPI data definition, also called the dictionary (McBride & Tietze, 2019). The second component is data stores which are comprised of enterprise data warehouse (EDW) and data marts (marts) (McBride & Tietze, 2019). The final component is data management which comprises the data model (DM), master data management (MDM), and terminology standards supporting interoperability (STDS) (McBride & Tietze, 2019).

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: Discussion 5.1: Enterprise Data Management and Analytics NUR 752

Title: Discussion 5.1: Enterprise Data Management and Analytics NUR 752

The organization I am employed at seems to be ready and has had time to prepare for a move forward with a strategic plan. The preparation includes integration of data-gathering technology in position with the CMS standards and terminology. Asset implementation of these few strategies embraces the workers, primarily with core values such as encouraging positive distinction among the workers and upholding a competitive attitude with the nearby facilities. The facility I work at appears to be in several E-DRAP stages of development (McBride & Tietze, 2019). The organization is working by evidence-based conclusions that have been proven to keep focus and a competitive advantage in the nearby marketplace (RSM, 2019). Where I work also has procedures that encourage accuracy, reconciliation of data, and enhancement of all KPIs (McBride & Tietze, 2019).

The use of BI at the organization I work at is the use of technology like software tools and algorithms that use data analysis to monitor performance components consistently (McBride & Tietze, 2019). The organization where I am employed uses its people including experienced staff members and executive team leaders. Additional utilization of people is leveraged in training for bedside staff members that are implemented in a trickle-down attitude from the headquarters office out of state. Several of these training sessions are held throughout the year for appropriate staff. The BI library contains the KPI data utilized to enhance processes and business drivers (McBride & Tietze, 2019). Bedside staff use processes and technology that promote all KPI reporting and analysis of care drivers, core measures, and satisfaction. Much of the process that bedside staff use is worked into the electronic charting and existing workflow of direct bedside care. Data Pine has found eight vital KPI parts. Those parts are treatment costs, average hospital stay, 30-day readmission rates, safety, satisfaction, cost by insurers, and treatment and emergency care wait times (Data Pine, n.d.). Each KPI part is recorded and published by the Medicare Hospital Compare website linked by the hospital’s quality care tracking portal, which has public access (National Quality Program achieves…-LifePoint Health, n.d.).

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Discussion 5.1: Enterprise Data Management and Analytics NUR 752

In conclusion, E-DRAP appears to be vital to my organization’s quality of reports and data analysis (McBride & Tietze, 2019). The administration at my organization has a good relationship with clinical staff that can help safeguard the idea that processes and technologies will be used and remain an effective way to report, track, and drive care. I am confident that my organization empowers its employees to be strong participants in the overall enhancement of patient care and the healthcare experience on all sides of the bed.

Discussion 5.1: Enterprise Data Management and Analytics NUR 752

References

Data Pine. (n.d.). Start finding the right KPIs for your business. https://www.datapine.com/kpi-examples-and-templates/

McBride, S., Tietze, M. (2019). Nursing Informatics for the advanced practice nurse: Patient safety, quality, outcomes, and… interprofessionalism. Springer publishing.

National Quality Program achieves … – lifepointhealth.net. (n.d.). Retrieved March 19, 2022, from https://www.lifepointhealth.net/docs/default-source/default-document-library/joint-commission-journal-lifepoint-nqp-july-2018.pdf?sfvrsn=e87adaf0_2

Value: 15 points

Introduction

The purpose of this discussion is to provide you with a framework to assess your organization with the goal of developing trusted and meaningful data, reporting, and analytics to support your organization’s enterprise strategic plan. DNP leaders know that profitability is increased in organizations that are early adopters in the “analytics revolution” (McBride, 2018, p. 402). A framework is useful in assessing and organizing a plan to best utilize enterprise data. The framework we will examine is known as the Enterprise Data Management, Reporting, and Analytics Program (E-DRAP), and it is designed to integrate clinical, financial, operational, and third-party data sources for robust reporting and analytics (McBride, 2018, p. 402).

The E-DRAP framework is modular to meet the needs of various healthcare delivery organizations, regardless of size, organizational complexity, or level of maturity, as well as more complex enterprise data warehouses (EDWs) (McBride, 2018, p. 402).

Discussion Guidelines

Initial Post

Utilizing the E-DRAP framework from your assigned readings, Chapter 17 of your textbook, you are to:

Evaluate your own organization’s readiness to move forward on a strategic information plan to best utilize enterprise data.
Assess the key components of reporting and analytics content, specifically addressing the people, technology, and processes.

Response Posts

Read through the posts created by your peers and reply to at least two other posts. Each reply should include the following:

A reflection on the differences between your organization and your peer’s organization.
A prediction on how McBride, et al., might suggest that your peers’ organizations be more prepared to effectively use enterprise data, reporting, and analytics.

Submission

Post your initial and follow up responses and review full grading criteria on the Discussion 5.1: Enterprise Data Management and Analytics page.

Grading Rubric

Performance Category	100% or highest level of performance 100% 16 points	Very good or high level of performance 88% 14 points	Acceptable level of performance 81% 13 points	Inadequate demonstration of expectations 68% 11 points	Deficient level of performance 56% 9 points	Failing level of performance 55% or less 0 points
Total Points Possible= 50	16 Points	14 Points	13 Points	11 Points	9 Points	0 Points
Scholarliness Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s). Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts. Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.* Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
	16 Points	14 Points	13 Points	11 Points	9 Points	0 Points
Application of Course Knowledge Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations	Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements: Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.	Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic. Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience. Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
	10 Points	9 Points			6 Points	0 Points
Interactive Dialogue Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count) The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count) Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.	Demonstrated all of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.	Demonstrated 3 of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.			Demonstrated 2 of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.	Demonstrated 1 or less of the following: Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words. The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each. Responses are substantive Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
	8 Points	7 Points	6 Points	5 Points	4 Points	0 Points
Grammar, Syntax, APA Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing. The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.	The following was present: 0-3 errors in APA format AND Responses have 0-3 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND Writing style is generally clear, focused on topic,and facilitates communication.	The following was present: 4-6 errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is somewhat focused on topic.	The following was present: 7-9 errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is slightly focused on topic making discussion difficult to understand.	The following was present: 10- 12 errors in APA format AND/OR Responses have 8-9 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand.	The following was present: 13 – 15 errors in APA format AND/OR Responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors AND/OR Writing style is not focused on topic, making discussion difficult to understand. AND/OR The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor.	The following was present: 16 to greater errors in APA format. AND/OR Responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. AND/OR Writing style does not facilitate communication
	0 Points Deducted					5 Points Lost
Participation Requirements	Demonstrated the following: Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days					Failed to demonstrate the following: Initial, peer, and faculty postings were made on 3 separate days
	0 Points Lost					5 Points Lost
Due Date Requirements	Demonstrated all of the following: The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.					Demonstrates one or less of the following. The initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic is posted within the course no later than Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. A minimum of one peer and one instructor responses are to be posted within the course no later than Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.