Discussion #2: Final Research Project PowerPoint Presentation 

Discussion #2: Final Research Project PowerPoint Presentation (PowerPoint (PPT):

TWO (2) posts are required for each discussion forum. Try to make your first initial post (response to the discussion question) by Thursday and your next posts (response to other students’ posts) by Sunday.

Title: Effective Poster Presentations For Your Research Conference

Directions:

1. The final research project presentation is an opportunity to present your finished Project to a supportive peer audience (Classmates) via discussion #2. The power point presentation (PPT) or Poster Board Template presentation should include the primary theory or claim you are defending, the bulk of the research upon which your position is based, and the major arguments that support it. You can utilize the information you have submitted within your assignment submissions for this course to complete your PPT.

There’s no required slide count for this discussion. Make sure you address all criteria/questions below for your initial discussion posting. Be Creative (include, photos, charts graphs, videos, etc). If you are going to use Prezi you must attach the PDF of your Prezi, no links are accepted for prezi presentations only PDF’s.

See example Discussion #2 Presentation: SAMPLE_Dis2_The Impact of TV Advertisements on Elementary School.pdf

Actions

You are not obligated to follow exactly what’s on the example presentation. I am posting an example so that you can view in general what I am looking for within your submission. Please note that the example does not consist of additional criteria that are required within your submission, therefore, I strongly advise that you double-check the criteria below prior to submitting to this discussion board forum.

Presentation Format:  Required Criteria

Your submission MUST follow the format below with headings (i.e. abstract, problem statement, etc.).

1. Title Page: Student First and last name, Panther ID number, topic, course (prefix, name, title) and instructor name.
2. Abstract= A concise summary of the key points of your research. Your abstract should contain at least your research topic, research questions, participants, methods, results, data analysis, and conclusions.  You may also include possible implications of your research and future work you see connected with your findings.  Your abstract should be a single paragraph double-spaced.  Your abstract should be between 150 and 250 words.

3.Introduction:

1. Motivation to study this topic(Why this work is important; keep general and cite statements)
2. Objectives (Goals of this paper)
3. Organizational overview of final paper (will review 5 research articles etc.).

4.Literature Review:

1. background information on topic
2. specific information to assist the reader’s understanding

• Key terms (A minimum of 3 Key terms are required)

1. Analysis Approach (What was done; describe the population/subjects, methods, type of research; statistics used, etc.).
   1. Introduction Paragraph Include database used for literature reviews and inclusion/exclusion criteria for choosing the five original research articles.
   2. Author’s name of each 5 research articles
      1. Aim
      2. Subjects
      3. Methods
      4. Type of Research
2. Results (What was found)
   1. Author’s name of each 5 research articles
   2. Heading for result of first major task
3. Discussion (how results contribute to knowledge in the field, e.g. compare results to literature)
4. Heading for discussion
5. Gaps in the research reviewed
6. Overall strengths and weaknesses of the research articles.
7. Needed future work in the field.
8. Conclusions .
   1. Summary of objectives and approach of this paper
   2. Major findings of this paper
   3. Important implications of this paper’s findings.
9. Recommendations based upon the review of these 5 research articles
10. Reflection statement: Provide a summary (1 paragraph; 5-6 complete sentences)) statement of your  thoughts on the research project (i.e., what are you the most proud of while completing the research, what were the biggest challenges, advantages and disadvantages,are their any disappointments?, what methods will you use to communicate your research results to your chosen audience (i.e. delivery of research to bring awareness; i.e. via social media, email, etc.) ?, what are your hopes for the future with your research project, etc.).

11.List and provide (websites) of Two (2) potential peer review Journals that your abstract/ manuscript may be published in (refer to chapters 34-36 from your course required textbook to get ideas).

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: Discussion #2: Final Research Project PowerPoint Presentation 

Title:  Discussion #2: Final Research Project PowerPoint Presentation

A

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:Discussion #2: Final Research Project PowerPoint Presentation 

• Grid View

		Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Main Posting		45 (45%) – 50 (50%) Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.   Supported by at least three current, credible sources.   Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.	40 (40%) – 44 (44%) Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.   At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.   Supported by at least three credible sources.   Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.	35 (35%) – 39 (39%) Responds to some of the discussion question(s).   One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.   Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.   Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.   Post is cited with two credible sources.   Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.   Contains some APA formatting errors.	0 (0%) – 34 (34%) Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.   Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.   Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.   Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.   Contains only one or no credible sources.   Not written clearly or concisely.   Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.   Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Post: Timeliness		10 (10%) – 10 (10%) Posts main post by day 3.	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not post by day 3.
First Response		17 (17%) – 18 (18%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.   Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.   Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.   Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.   Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.   Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.   Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	15 (15%) – 16 (16%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.   Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.   Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.   Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.   Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	13 (13%) – 14 (14%) Response is on topic and may have some depth.   Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.   Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.   Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.	0 (0%) – 12 (12%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.   Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.   Responses to faculty questions are missing.   No credible sources are cited.
Second Response		16 (16%) – 17 (17%) Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.   Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.   Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.   Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.   Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.   Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.   Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	14 (14%) – 15 (15%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.   Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.   Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.   Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.   Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.	12 (12%) – 13 (13%) Response is on topic and may have some depth.   Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.   Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.   Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited.	0 (0%) – 11 (11%) Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.   Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.   Responses to faculty questions are missing.   No credible sources are cited.
Participation		5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%)	0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days.
Total Points: 100