Want create site? With Free visual composer you can do it easy.

Discussion #2 Effective Poster Presentations For Your Research Conference

Discussion #2 Effective Poster Presentations For Your Research Conference

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Discussion #2 Effective Poster Presentations For Your Research Conference

Description

Discussion #2: Final Research Project PowerPoint Presentation (PowerPoint (PPT):

TWO (2) posts are required for each discussion forum. Try to make your first initial post (response to the discussion question) by Thursday and your next posts (response to other students’ posts) by Sunday.

Title: Effective Poster Presentations For Your Research Conference

Directions:

  1. The final research project presentation is an opportunity to present your finished Project to a supportive peer audience (Classmates) via discussion #2. The power point presentation (PPT) or Poster Board Template presentation should include the primary theory or claim you are defending, the bulk of the research upon which your position is based, and the major arguments that support it. You can utilize the information you have submitted within your assignment submissions for this course to complete your PPT.

There’s no required slide count for this discussion. Make sure you address all criteria/questions below for your initial discussion posting. Be Creative (include, photos, charts graphs, videos, etc). If you are going to use Prezi you must attach the PDF of your Prezi, no links are accepted for prezi presentations only PDF’s.

See example Discussion #2 Presentation: SAMPLE_Dis2_The Impact of TV Advertisements on Elementary School.pdf

Actions

You are not obligated to follow exactly what’s on the example presentation. I am posting an example so that you can view in general what I am looking for within your submission. Please note that the example does not consist of additional criteria that are required within your submission, therefore, I strongly advise that you double-check the criteria below prior to submitting to this discussion board forum.

Presentation Format:  Required Criteria

Your submission MUST follow the format below with headings (i.e. abstract, problem statement, etc.).

  1. Title Page: Student First and last name, Panther ID number, topic, course (prefix, name, title) and instructor name.
  2. Abstract= A concise summary of the key points of your research. Your abstract should contain at least your research topic, research questions, participants, methods, results, data analysis, and conclusions.  You may also include possible implications of your research and future work you see connected with your findings.  Your abstract should be a single paragraph double-spaced.  Your abstract should be between 150 and 250 words.

3.Introduction:

  1. Motivation to study this topic(Why this work is important; keep general and cite statements)
  2. Objectives (Goals of this paper)
  3. Organizational overview of final paper (will review 5 research articles etc.).

4.Literature Review:

  1. background information on topic
  2. specific information to assist the reader’s understanding
  • Key terms (A minimum of 3 Key terms are required)
  1. Analysis Approach (What was done; describe the population/subjects, methods, type of research; statistics used, etc.).
    1. Introduction Paragraph Include database used for literature reviews and inclusion/exclusion criteria for choosing the five original research articles.
    2. Author’s name of each 5 research articles
      1. Aim
      2. Subjects
      3. Methods
      4. Type of Research
  2. Results (What was found)
    1. Author’s name of each 5 research articles
    2. Heading for result of first major task
  3. Discussion (how results contribute to knowledge in the field, e.g. compare results to literature)
  4. Heading for discussion
  5. Gaps in the research reviewed
  6. Overall strengths and weaknesses of the research articles.
  7. Needed future work in the field.
  8. Conclusions .
    1. Summary of objectives and approach of this paper
    2. Major findings of this paper
    3. Important implications of this paper’s findings.
  9. Recommendations based upon the review of these 5 research articles
  10. Reflection statement: Provide a summary (1 paragraph; 5-6 complete sentences)) statement of your  thoughts on the research project (i.e., what are you the most proud of while completing the research, what were the biggest challenges, advantages and disadvantages,are their any disappointments?, what methods will you use to communicate your research results to your chosen audience (i.e. delivery of research to bring awareness; i.e. via social media, email, etc.) ?, what are your hopes for the future with your research project, etc.).

11.List and provide (websites) of Two (2) potential peer review Journals that your abstract/ manuscript may be published in (refer to chapters 34-36 from your course required textbook to get ideas).

  • Participation: RN-to-BSNIn discussions, you, as a student, will interact with your instructor and classmates to explore topics related to the content of this course. You will be graded for the following.
    1. Attendance

    Discussions (graded): Discussions are a critical learning experience in the online classroom. Participation in all discussions is required.

    1. Guidelines and Rubric for Discussions

    PURPOSE: Threaded discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In the discussions students:

    • Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week
    • Integrate scholarly resources
    • Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates
    • Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner

    Participation Requirement: You are required to post a minimum of three (3) times in each graded discussion. These three (3) posts must be on a minimum of two (2) separate days. You must respond to the initial discussion question by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday.

    Participation points: It is expected that you will meet the minimum participation requirement described above. If not:

    • You will receive a 10% point deduction in a thread if your response to the initial question is not posted by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday
    • You will also receive a 10% point deduction in a thread if you do not post at least three (3) times in each thread on at least two (2) separate days.
    1. Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles

    The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

    1. Participation Guidelines

    You are required to post a minimum of three (3) times in each graded discussion. These three (3) posts must be on a minimum of two (2) separate days. You must respond to the initial discussion question by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday. Discussions for each week close on Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Mountain Time (MT). To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. For courses with Week 8 graded discussions, the threads will close on Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT. All discussion requirements must be met by that deadline

    1. Grading Rubric

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Discussion #2 Effective Poster Presentations For Your Research Conference

Discussion #2 Effective Poster Presentations For Your Research Conference

Discussion #2 Effective Poster Presentations For Your Research Conference

  • Discussion Criteria  A
    (100%)
    Outstanding or highest level of performance 
    B
    (87%)
    Very good or high level of performance
    C
    (76%)
    Competent or satisfactory level of performance
    F
    (0)
    Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performance
    Answers the initial graded threaded discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of concepts for the week.
    16 points
    Addresses all aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding regarding all weekly concepts.

    16 points

    Addresses most aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of most of the weekly concepts.

    14 points

    Addresses some aspects of the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of some of the weekly concepts.

    12 points

    Minimally addresses the initial discussion question(s) or does not address the initial question(s).

    0 points

    Integrates evidence to support discussion. Sources are credited.*
    ( APA format not required)
    12 points
    Integrates evidence to support your discussion from:

    • assigned readings** OR online lessons, AND
    • at least one outside scholarly source.***

    Sources are credited.*

    12 points

    Integrates evidence to support discussion from:

    • assigned readings OR online lesson.

    Sources are credited.*

    10 points

    Integrates evidence to support discussion only from an outside source with no mention of assigned reading or lesson.

    Sources are credited.*

    9 points

    Does not integrate any evidence.

    0 points

    Engages in meaningful dialogue with classmates or instructor before the end of the week.
    14 points
    Responds to a classmate and/or instructor’s post furthering the dialogue by providing more information and clarification, thereby adding much depth to the discussion.

    14 points

    Responds to a classmate and/or instructor furthering the dialogue by adding some depth to the discussion.

    12 points

    Responds to a classmate and/or instructor but does not further the discussion.

    10 points

    No response post to another student or instructor.

    0 points

    Communicates in a professional manner.
    8 points
    Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

    8 points

    Presents information in an organized manner (few errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

    7 points

    Presents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (some errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).

    6 points

    Presents information that is not clear, logical, professional or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).

    0 points

    PARTICIPATION:
    Response to initial question: Responds to initial discussion question(s) by
    Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. M.T.
    0 points lost

    Student posts an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p . m. MT.

    -5 points

    Student does not post an answer to the initial discussion question(s) by Wednesday, 11:59 p . m. MT.

    PARTICIPATION
    Total posts: Participates in the discussion thread at least three times on at least two different days.
    0 points lost

    Posts in the discussion at least three times AND on two different days.

    -5 points

    Posts fewer than three times OR does not participate on at least two different days.

    NOTES:
    * Credited means stating where the information came from (specific article, text, or lesson). Examples: Our text discusses…. The information from our lesson states…, Smith (2010) claimed that…, Mary Manners (personal communication, November 17, 2011)…. APA formatting is not required.
    ** Assigned readings are those listed on the syllabus or assignments page as required reading. This may include text readings, required articles, or required websites.
    *** Scholarly source – per the APA Guidelines in Course Resources, only scholarly sources should be used in assignments. These include peer reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. Wikipedia, Wikis, .com website or blogs should not be used as anyone can add to these. For the discussions, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. Outside sources do not include assigned required readings.
    NOTE: A zero is the lowest score that a student can be assign

    Also Read: Health & Medical Question KINESIOLOGY Professional Organizations Assignment

 

 

 

Did you find apk for android? You can find new Free Android Games and apps.