Comparing Organizations With Benchmark Data Essay

Comparing Organizations With Benchmark Data Essay

Sample Answer for Comparing Organizations With Benchmark Data Essay Included

Comparing Organizations With Benchmark Data Essay

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: Comparing Organizations With Benchmark Data Essay

Title: Comparing Organizations With Benchmark Data Essay

Health facilities offer different quality care based upon the competency of staffs and the availability of medical tools. Persons seeking medical services should take into account quality aspects of care even as they leverage on the cost efficiency of one facility compared to another. The purpose of this paper is to compare two distinct health institutions based on their performance in quality care.
Description of Two Organizations
The first chosen care facility is the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (CSMC) where I did my clinical practicums as a nurse student four years ago. The facility is a non-profit institution located in Beverly Grove in Los Angeles, California. The hospital has a bed capacity of 958 and is also a multi-specialty academic health science for the training of students enrolled in health science courses. The facility is a Level I Trauma Center preferred by both for pediatrics and adults. It is a rehabilitation center for patients with anxiety disorders and provided trauma-related services such as surgery. The Joint Commission accredited Cedars-Sinai for the treatment of stroke, surgery as well as neonatal and pregnancy related complications. The facility is ranked fourth in the entire western United States of America.The second facility I chose is the Dignity Health-California Hospital Medical Center (CHMC). The care center is located in Los Angeles, California. The facility has a 318-bed capacity, and the emergency department offers treatment to over 70,000 patients annually. CHMC is a Level II Trauma Center. It also operates cardiology, orthopedics, intensive care unit as well as obstetrics and gynecology departments. In 2013, the facility received an accreditation from the Joint Commission as a certified primary stroke center. CHMC also received the Flu Compliance Award in 2014 as well as the National Patient Satisfaction Award.
Comparison of Two Organizations

The first comparison of the two facilities is based on the examination of the (HCAHPS) Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems scores. According to Astier-Peña et al. (2016), the latter is used to measure patient experience based on in-patient services and care is ranked as per 10-point scale. Based on the patients surveyed, the HCAHPS for CSMC was rated at 65% for its emergency services in 2018. This followed a drop based on the previous year results where the results stood at 67%. The patient satisfaction at the inpatient units was rated at 83% in 2018, an improvement from the previous year. However, the outpatient services were estimated at 92% in 2018 and have since recorded an improvement giving the overall 4.0-star rating. The CHMC facility, on the other hand, received a 2.5-star rating at 54% based on its implementation of the HCAHPS. This indicates dissatisfaction of patients with quality services especially with regard to pediatrics and postpartum care.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Comparing Organizations With Benchmark Data Essay

Howell et al. (2015) vouch for comparison of the two facilities based on the report of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). For the CHMC, the Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) was low at 0.85 while Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus

aureus bloodstream infections (MRSA BSI) rated at 0.87. Clostridium difficile diarrhea infections (CDI) was recorded at 0.85, and the surgical site infections (SSI) rated at 0.89 in the standardized infection ratio (SIR). As for the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, the CLABSI was lower than the national benchmark a recorded at 0.7. MSRA was rated at 0.3 while colon surgical site infection ratio recorded at 0.7 compared to the California benchmark of 0.9.
Analysis of Factors that Contribute to Performance Measures
Different values for performance measurements are recorded in the two health facilities. The Cedars-Sinai Medical Center received a 4.0-star rating compared to the 2.5-star rating for CHMC. The higher the star rating the better the quality of healthcare administered to patients. HAI and the HCAHPS for the two facilities were analyzed based on the 2018 findings. However, evidenced-based measures for each facility could not be ascertained as the performance measurements relied on the report provided by patients following a one month study in care centers.
Data Standardization to Improve Quality Comparison Measures
Duplechan (2016) ascertains the effectiveness in quality comparison since the information on HAI and the HCAHPS is based on raw data from patients. The quality measures of the information from the respondents are compared with the databases in the electronic health records (EHR) systems for each of the care facilities to ascertain the accuracies in the comparison of patient care. According to Astier-Peña et al. (2016), EHR guarantees reliable and standardized information regarding the current information on performance measurement for care facilities. Neuhausen et al. (2014) indicates that the report complements the qualitative data availed by patients as per their perception of care. As such, the gaps in quality care can be identified by the hospital administrators in a bid to respond to poor service delivery.
Conclusion
Patients determine the quality performance measurements based on their perception of health service delivery. The study delved into a comparison analysis of care in the two facilities in Los Angeles, California. The performance measurements were leveraged on HAI and the HCAHPS in which Cedars-Sinai Medical Center was rated best compared to Dignity Health-California Hospital Medical Center. Patients in Los Angeles and with close proximity to both the facilities would prefer Cedars-Sinai Medical Center to the CHMC for quality care.

 

Please follow the template uploaded

Describe the two organizations you selected and explain why you chose them.

Summarize how your local organization compares to the local competitor, state averages, and national averages using the benchmark data from the three Compare sites in this week’s Resources.

Identify and describe any factors that can explain differences in performance measures. Find one scholarly article that could explain the differences.

Explain how these differences in performance measures might impact nursing practice.
Analyze the effect of publicly reported data on the quality and safety of care for ONE of the following organizations. Select hospitals, nursing homes, OR home health agencies, and analyze the effect of the data listed under that organization:

For Hospitals:
Patient Survey Results
Timely and Effective Care
Readmissions, Complications, and Deaths
Use of Medical Imaging
Linking Quality to Payment
Medicare Volume

https://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/About/What-Is-HOS.html
For Hospitals:
Patient Survey Results
Timely and Effective Care
Readmissions, Complications, and Deaths
Use of Medical Imaging
Linking Quality to Payment
Medicare Volume

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation

Welcome to class

Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to

I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.

Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.

If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.

Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.

Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.

I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

Hi Class,

Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.

Contact me if you have any questions.

Important information on Writing a Discussion Question

• Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
• There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
• Include in-text citations in your response
• Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
• Follow APA-7th edition
• Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor

• A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
• Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
• Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
• Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
• Follow APA 7th edition
• Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
• Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
• Here are some helpful links
• Student paper example
• Citing Sources
• The Writing Center is a great resource